Welcome to the jungle! The neuromarketing literature through the eyes of a newcomer

To grow, any field of research must both encourage newcomers to work within its boundaries, and help them learn to conduct excellent research within the field’s parameters. This paper aims to examine whether the existing body of neuromarketing literature can support such growth. Specifically, the authors attempt to replicate how a newcomer to the field of neuromarketing would go about orienting themselves to the field and learn how to conduct excellent neuromarketing research.,A total of 131 papers, published in the areas of “neuromarketing” and “consumer neuroscience” were downloaded and then identified as conceptual or empirical in nature. A separate database was created for each type of research paper and information was recorded. For both conceptual and empirical papers, the citation details, notably year of publication, journal, journal ranking and impact factor were recorded. Papers were then descriptively analysed with regards to number of publications over the years, content and journal quality.,It is found that interest in the field is growing, with a greater variety of topics and methods appearing year on year. However, the authors also identify some issues of concern for the field if it wishes to sustain this growth. First, the highly fragmented literature and the lack of signposting makes it very difficult for newcomers to find the relevant work and journal outlets. Second, there is a lack of high-quality, user-oriented methodological primers that a newcomer would come across. Finally, neuromarketing as it appears to a newcomer suffers from a lack of clear guidance on what defines good vs bad neuromarketing research. As a large majority of the reviewed papers have appeared in lower-ranked journals, newcomers might get a biased view on the acceptable research standards in the field.,The insights from the analysis inform a tentative agenda for future work which gives neuromarketing itself greater scientific purpose, and the potential to grow into a better-established field of study within marketing as a whole.

[1]  Isabell M. Welpe,et al.  The role of emotions in decision-making on employer brands: insights from functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) , 2016 .

[2]  R. Poldrack Inferring Mental States from Neuroimaging Data: From Reverse Inference to Large-Scale Decoding , 2011, Neuron.

[3]  S. Braeutigam Neuroeconomics—From neural systems to economic behaviour , 2005, Brain Research Bulletin.

[4]  R. Cropanzano,et al.  Organizational neuroscience: The promise and prospects of an emerging discipline , 2010 .

[5]  Colin Camerer,et al.  Neuroeconomics: How Neuroscience Can Inform Economics , 2005 .

[6]  Seung-Eun Lee,et al.  Measuring Neural Responses to Apparel Product Attractiveness , 2017 .

[7]  Bernd H. Schmitt The consumer psychology of brands , 2012 .

[8]  Scott A. Huettel,et al.  Consumer Neuroscience: Applications, Challenges, and Possible Solutions , 2015 .

[9]  Dirk Lindebaum,et al.  Not quite a revolution: Scrutinizing organizational neuroscience in leadership studies , 2013 .

[10]  Dirk Lindebaum Pathologizing the Healthy But Ineffective , 2013 .

[11]  C. Senior,et al.  A Role for Endogenous Brain States in Organizational Research: Moving Toward a Dynamic View of Cognitive Processes , 2019 .

[12]  Ale Smidts,et al.  Brain Responses to Movie Trailers Predict Individual Preferences for Movies and Their Population-Wide Commercial Success , 2015 .

[13]  Hans Knutsson,et al.  Cluster failure: Why fMRI inferences for spatial extent have inflated false-positive rates , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[14]  Russell A. Poldrack,et al.  Large-scale automated synthesis of human functional neuroimaging data , 2011, Nature Methods.

[15]  J. Zaichkowsky,et al.  Functional magnetic resonance imaging in consumer research: A review and application , 2011 .

[16]  S. Rose,et al.  Salience and choice: Neural correlates of shopping decisions , 2004 .

[17]  Brian A. Nosek,et al.  Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience , 2013, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[18]  Karl J. Friston The labile brain. I. Neuronal transients and nonlinear coupling. , 2000, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[19]  Nick Lee,et al.  Neuromarketing and consumer neuroscience: contributions to neurology , 2013, BMC Neurology.

[20]  Dirk Lindebaum Critical Essay: Building new management theories on sound data? The case of neuroscience , 2015, Human relations; studies towards the integration of the social sciences.

[21]  Yesim Isil Ulman,et al.  Ethical Issues in Neuromarketing: “I Consume, Therefore I am!” , 2015, Sci. Eng. Ethics.

[22]  R. Bagozzi,et al.  Philosophical Foundations of Neuroscience in Organizational Research: Functional and Nonfunctional Approaches , 2019 .

[23]  Emily B. Falk,et al.  Neural Correlates of Susceptibility to Group Opinions in Online Word-of-Mouth Recommendations , 2015 .

[24]  R. Poldrack Can cognitive processes be inferred from neuroimaging data? , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[25]  Nick Lee,et al.  Neuroimaging and Psychophysiological Measurement in Organizational Research , 2007, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[26]  L. Warlop,et al.  Bikinis Instigate Generalized Impatience in Intertemporal Choice , 2008 .

[27]  C. Senior,et al.  The Domain of Organizational Cognitive Neuroscience , 2012 .

[28]  L. Warlop,et al.  Inhibitory Spillover , 2011, Psychological science.

[29]  C. Koch,et al.  Relative visual saliency differences induce sizable bias in consumer choice , 2012 .

[30]  Karl J. Friston Sample size and the fallacies of classical inference , 2013, NeuroImage.

[31]  Colin F. Camerer,et al.  Introduction to the Journal of Marketing Research Special Issue on Neuroscience and Marketing , 2015 .

[32]  Laura Chamberlain,et al.  What is "neuromarketing"? A discussion and agenda for future research. , 2007, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[33]  Juan Sánchez-Fernández,et al.  The contribution of neuroscience to consumer research: A conceptual framework and empirical review , 2013 .

[34]  N. Ashkanasy Neuroscience and Leadership , 2013 .

[35]  C. Senior,et al.  Critical Essay: Organizational cognitive neuroscience drives theoretical progress, or: The curious case of the straw man murder , 2017 .

[36]  H. Pashler,et al.  Puzzlingly High Correlations in fMRI Studies of Emotion, Personality, and Social Cognition 1 , 2009, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[37]  Ariel Telpaz,et al.  Using EEG to Predict Consumers’ Future Choices , 2015 .

[38]  J. Ioannidis Why Most Published Research Findings Are False , 2005, PLoS medicine.

[39]  S. Huettel,et al.  Experimental Methods in Cognitive Neuroscience , 2014 .

[40]  S. Matthews Neuromarketing: What is it and is it a threat to privacy? , 2014 .

[41]  Marion Smits,et al.  A Sales Force–Specific Theory-of-Mind Scale: Tests of Its Validity by Classical Methods and Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2009 .

[42]  D. Fugate Neuromarketing: a layman's look at neuroscience and its potential application to marketing practice , 2007 .

[43]  V. Daniel R. Guide,et al.  Notes from the Editors: Redefining some methodological criteria for the journal ☆ , 2015 .

[44]  Russell A. Poldrack,et al.  Six problems for causal inference from fMRI , 2010, NeuroImage.

[45]  Camilla L. Nord,et al.  Power-up: A Reanalysis of 'Power Failure' in Neuroscience Using Mixture Modeling , 2017, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[46]  Shinobu Kitayama,et al.  Advancing consumer neuroscience , 2014 .

[47]  Willem Verbeke,et al.  Genetic and neurological foundations of customer orientation: field and experimental evidence , 2011, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science.

[48]  Nick Lee,et al.  Organizational cognitive neuroscience drives theoretical progress, or : the curious case of the straw man murder , 2016 .

[49]  M. Olteanu Neuroethics and Responsibility in Conducting Neuromarketing Research , 2015 .

[50]  T. Daugherty,et al.  Research in reverse: Ad testing using an inductive consumer neuroscience approach , 2016 .

[51]  Stephen M. Nowlis,et al.  A Bite to Whet the Reward Appetite: The Influence of Sampling on Reward-Seeking Behaviors , 2008 .

[52]  Karl J. Friston Ten ironic rules for non-statistical reviewers , 2012, NeuroImage.

[53]  Ed Vul,et al.  Voodoo and circularity errors , 2012, NeuroImage.

[54]  Hilke Plassmann,et al.  Applications of functional magnetic resonance imaging for market research , 2007 .

[55]  Gerard J. Tellis,et al.  Interesting and impactful research: on phenomena, theory, and writing , 2017 .

[56]  Deena Skolnick Weisberg,et al.  The Seductive Allure of Neuroscience Explanations , 2008, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[57]  Michael B. Miller,et al.  The principled control of false positives in neuroimaging. , 2009, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.

[58]  Maarten A. S. Boksem,et al.  Neural Responses to Functional and Experiential Ad Appeals: Explaining Ad Effectiveness , 2017 .

[59]  D. Ariely,et al.  Neuromarketing: the hope and hype of neuroimaging in business , 2010, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[60]  James H. Steiger,et al.  Driving Fast in Reverse , 2001 .

[61]  Hans Knutsson,et al.  Does Parametric Fmri Analysis with Spm Yield Valid Results? -an Empirical Study of 1484 Rest Datasets Does Parametric Fmri Analysis with Spm Yield Valid Results? - an Empirical Study of 1484 Rest Datasets , 2022 .

[62]  G. Hodgkinson,et al.  Rethinking the philosophical and theoretical foundations of organizational neuroscience: A critical realist alternative , 2014 .

[63]  C. Senior,et al.  Toward an Organizational Cognitive Neuroscience , 2007, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[64]  W. J. Becker,et al.  Organizational Neuroscience: Taking Organizational Theory Inside the Neural Black Box , 2011 .

[65]  CM Bennett,et al.  Neural correlates of interspecies perspective taking in the post-mortem Atlantic Salmon: an argument for multiple comparisons correction , 2009, NeuroImage.

[66]  Scott A. Huettel,et al.  Neuromarketing: Ethical Implications of its Use and Potential Misuse , 2016, Journal of Business Ethics.

[67]  Leif D. Nelson,et al.  From “Where” to “What”: Distributed Representations of Brand Associations in the Human Brain , 2015, JMR, Journal of marketing research.

[68]  Vlăsceanu Sebastian,et al.  Neuromarketing and Evaluation of Cognitive and Emotional Responses of Consumers to Marketing Stimuli. , 2014 .

[69]  Tim Ambler,et al.  Magnetoencephalographic Signals Identify Stages in Real-Life Decision Processes , 2001, Neural plasticity.

[70]  C. Senior,et al.  Cognitive neuroscience: contributions from psychophysiology , 2007 .

[71]  Nick Lee,et al.  Redefining neuromarketing as an integrated science of influence , 2015, Front. Hum. Neurosci..