Propagation of Cracks in the Secondary Lining of Tunnels Subjected to Asymmetrical Pressure and a Safety Evaluation

This paper aims to study the way cracks propagate in the secondary lining of tunnels subjected to asymmetrical pressure and to determine the corresponding safety evaluation standards. To achieve this, a cracked part of the secondary lining of the Gucheng-Zhuxi expressway tunnel in Hubei, China was studied under asymmetrical pressure. Using fracture mechanics, the propagation laws and characteristics of the cracks on different scales are analyzed under different asymmetrical pressures and at different positions. The study is based on stress-intensity factor theory and uses ANSYS finite-element software. The results show that crack width (b) has a small effect on crack propagation in the lining structure. On the other hand, crack depth (h) has an obvious effect. The stress-intensity factors at asymmetrically-loaded positions are found to be clearly larger than those at symmetrically-loaded positions. That is, an asymmetrical pressure distribution promotes the propagation of cracks at asymmetrically-loaded positions (and inhibits that at symmetrically-loaded positions, to some extent). When the value of h falls in the range from 3 to 12 cm, the cracks propagate in a stable manner in asymmetrically-loaded positions; at a depth of 15 cm, the propagation becomes unstable. Thus, a crack depth of h = 12 cm can be regarded as the critical value signaling the onset of instability and failure of the secondary lining when considering the safety margin required of the lining structure. Combining the existing safety evaluation standards for cracks with a new evaluation index—the crack depth h—we propose a new safety evaluation standard that is suitable for cracks in the secondary lining of the Gucheng-Zhuxi expressway tunnel under asymmetrical pressure. In addition, suggestions are made for properly treating different types of crack.

[1]  Jean-Baptiste Leblond,et al.  In-plane perturbation of the tunnel-crack under shear loading I: bifurcation and stability of the straight configuration of the front , 2002 .

[2]  Dietrich Munz,et al.  Stress intensity factor at the surface and at the deepest point of a semi-elliptical surface crack in plates under stress gradients , 1983 .

[3]  P. C. Paris,et al.  Stress Analysis of Cracks , 1965 .

[4]  Kazuo Arakawa,et al.  Dependence of crack acceleration on the dynamic stress-intensity factor in polymers , 1987 .

[5]  Jean-Baptiste Leblond,et al.  Statistics of the deformation of the front of a tunnel-crack propagating in some inhomogeneous medium , 2006 .

[6]  James C. Newman,et al.  A review and assessment of the stress-intensity factors for surface cracks , 1979 .

[7]  Giovanni Plizzari,et al.  Influence of concrete strength on crack development in SFRC members , 2014 .

[8]  Bernardino Chiaia,et al.  Crack Patterns in Reinforced and Fiber Reinforced Concrete Structures , 2008 .

[9]  Kuang-Chong Wu,et al.  Stress Intensity Factor and Energy Release Rate for Interfacial Cracks Between Dissimilar Anisotropic Materials , 1990 .

[10]  Frank J. Vecchio,et al.  Crack Model for Steel Fiber-Reinforced Concrete Members Containing Conventional Reinforcement , 2014 .

[11]  Albert S. Kobayashi,et al.  Stress intensity factor for an elliptical crack under arbitrary normal loading , 1971 .

[12]  Giovanni Plizzari,et al.  Cracking behavior in reinforced concrete members with steel fibers: A comprehensive experimental study , 2015 .

[13]  Francesco Micelli,et al.  Crack width prediction of FRC beams in short and long term bending condition , 2014 .

[14]  Jean-Baptiste Leblond,et al.  Three-dimensional crack-face weight functions for the semi-infinite interface crack—I: Variation of the stress intensity factors due to some small perturbation of the crack front , 1998 .

[15]  Yu Hua-wei Prevention of Through Crack in Secondary Lining of Railway Mountain Tunnel , 2010 .

[16]  Ming Cai,et al.  Generalized crack initiation and crack damage stress thresholds of brittle rock masses near underground excavations , 2004 .

[17]  Giovanni Plizzari,et al.  Derivation of a simplified stress–crack width law for Fiber Reinforced Concrete through a revised round panel test , 2015 .

[18]  Xie Dongwu SAFETY EVALUATION OF TUNNEL LINING WITH LONGITUDINAL CRACKS AND REINFORCEMENT DESIGN , 2010 .

[19]  A. Ingraffea,et al.  Stress‐intensity factor computation in three dimensions with quarter‐point elements , 1980 .

[20]  Alida Mazzoli,et al.  Evaluation of the early-age-shrinkage of Fiber Reinforced Concrete (FRC) using image analysis methods , 2015 .

[21]  Amir Reza Shahani,et al.  Stress intensity factors in a hollow cylinder containing a circumferential semi-elliptical crack subjected to combined loading , 2007 .

[22]  Pedro Albrecht,et al.  RAPID CALCULATION OF STRESS INTENSITY FACTORS , 1977 .

[23]  Bernardino Chiaia,et al.  Evaluation of crack width in FRC structures and application to tunnel linings , 2009 .