Visual comfort in autostereoscopic display

Autostereoscopic displays are likely to become widely used products in the future. However, certain physiological factors, especially visual comfort, limit their development. In this study, four observational parameters – ambient illuminance, image content, scaling ratio, and horizontal distance between major and minor objects – were evaluated to determine the degree of visual comfort offered by 3D computer-generated images on an autostereoscopic display. Visual comfort score with the range of 0–1 is designed to represent the degree of visual comfort for the 3D images with different manipulations of ambient illuminance, image content, scaling ratio, and horizontal distance between major and minor objects in this study. Subjects were asked to indicate images that produced discomfort. The proportion of images for each condition where participants indicated that viewing the image was comfortable was computed. Images receiving a proportion of 0.5 or greater were classified as acceptable. The disparity ranges over which acceptable images were attained for each participant and for each condition were analyzed with analysis of variance. The analytical results indicate that ambient illuminance and image content have a significant effect on the acceptable disparity range, while scaling ratio and horizontal distance between major and minor objects did not.

[1]  Robert Patterson,et al.  Review Paper: Human factors of stereo displays: An update , 2009 .

[2]  Miska Hannuksela,et al.  Effect of image scaling on stereoscopic movie experience , 2011, Electronic Imaging.

[3]  Takashi Shibata,et al.  Visual discomfort with stereo displays: effects of viewing distance and direction of vergence-accommodation conflict , 2011, Electronic Imaging.

[4]  Tzung-Han Lin,et al.  Perceived depth analysis for view navigation of stereoscopic three-dimensional models , 2014, J. Electronic Imaging.

[5]  Jukka Häkkinen,et al.  Effect of ambient illumination level on perceived autostereoscopic display quality and depth perception , 2011, Displays.

[6]  A Wolska,et al.  Luminance of the surround and visual fatigue of VDT operators. , 1999, International journal of occupational safety and ergonomics : JOSE.

[7]  Masaki Emoto,et al.  Visual comfort/discomfort and visual fatigue caused by stereoscopic HDTV viewing , 2004, IS&T/SPIE Electronic Imaging.

[8]  Mtm Marc Lambooij,et al.  Visual Discomfort and Visual Fatigue of Stereoscopic Displays: A Review , 2009 .

[9]  Luo Ronnier,et al.  Visual comfort in 2D/3D modes of glasses‐type stereoscopic displays , 2013 .

[10]  Keita Hirai,et al.  Erratum: Relationship Between Ambient Illumination and Psychological Effects for Television Viewing , 2011 .

[11]  Fumio Okano,et al.  Measurement of parallax distribution and its application to the analysis of visual comfort for stereoscopic HDTV , 2003, IS&T/SPIE Electronic Imaging.

[12]  Alexander Toet,et al.  Visual comfort of binocular and 3D displays , 2004 .

[13]  Matthias Wöpking,et al.  3-D displays: A review of current technologies , 1997 .