A saliency-specific and dimension-independent mechanism of distractor suppression

During everyday tasks, salient distractors may capture our attention. Recently, it was shown that through implicit learning, capture by a salient distractor is reduced by suppressing the location where a distractor is likely to appear. In the current study, we presented distractors of different saliency levels at the same specific location, asking the question whether there is always one suppression level for a particular location or whether, for one location, suppression depends on the actual saliency of the distractor appearing at that location. In three experiments, we demonstrate a saliency-specific mechanism of distractor suppression, which can be flexibly modulated by the overall probability of encountering distractors of different saliency levels to optimize behavior in a specific environment. The results also suggest that this mechanism has dimension-independent aspects, given that the saliency-specific suppression pattern is unaffected when saliency signals of distractors are generated by different dimensions. It is argued that suppression is saliency-dependent, implying that suppression is modulated on a trial-by-trial basis contingent on the saliency of the actual distractor presented.

[1]  D. Broadbent.  Perception and communication , 1958 .

[2]  C. Enroth-Cugell,et al.  Chapter 9 Visual adaptation and retinal gain controls , 1984 .

[3]  S Ullman,et al.  Shifts in selective visual attention: towards the underlying neural circuitry. , 1985, Human neurobiology.

[4]  J. Theeuwes.  Cross-dimensional perceptual selectivity , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.

[5]  J. Wolfe.  The Parallel Guidance of Visual Attention , 1992 .

[6]  J. Theeuwes.  Perceptual selectivity for color and form , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.

[7]  R. Desimone,et al.  Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. , 1995, Annual review of neuroscience.

[8]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[9]  R. Remington,et al.  Selectivity in distraction by irrelevant featural singletons: evidence for two forms of attentional capture. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[10]  Charles L. Folk,et al.  Selectivity in distraction by irrelevant featural singletons: evidence for two forms of attentional capture. , 1998 .

[11]  M. Chun,et al.  Top-Down Attentional Guidance Based on Implicit Learning of Visual Covariation , 1999 .

[12]  Arthur P. Shimamura,et al.  The role of the prefrontal cortex in dynamic filtering , 2000, Psychobiology.

[13]  C. Koch,et al.  A saliency-based search mechanism for overt and covert shifts of visual attention , 2000, Vision Research.

[14]  A. Hillstrom.  Repetition effects in visual search , 2000, Perception & psychophysics.

[15]  M. Carandini,et al.  Visual cortex: Fatigue and adaptation , 2000, Current Biology.

[16]  C. Koch,et al.  Computational modelling of visual attention , 2001, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[17]  Gernot Horstmann,et al.  Evidence for Attentional Capture by a Surprising Color Singleton in Visual Search , 2002, Psychological science.

[18]  R. Engle,et al.  The role of prefrontal cortex in working-memory capacity, executive attention, and general fluid intelligence: An individual-differences perspective , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[19]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain , 2002, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[20]  Zhaoping Li.  A saliency map in primary visual cortex , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[21]  P. Lennie.  The Cost of Cortical Computation , 2003, Current Biology.

[22]  J. Wolfe,et al.  What attributes guide the deployment of visual attention and how do they do it? , 2004, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[23]  Gustavo Deco,et al.  A Neurodynamical Model of Visual Attention: Feedback Enhancement of Spatial Resolution in a Hierarchical System , 2001, Journal of Computational Neuroscience.

[24]  G. Horstmann.  Attentional capture by an unannounced color singleton depends on expectation discrepancy. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[25]  E. Rolls,et al.  A Neurodynamical Model of Visual Attention , 2005 .

[26]  J. Theeuwes,et al.  Electrophysiological Evidence of the Capture of Visual Attention , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[27]  P. Sterling,et al.  How Much the Eye Tells the Brain , 2006, Current Biology.

[28]  M. Webster,et al.  Visual adaptation: Neural, psychological and computational aspects , 2007, Vision Research.

[29]  Adam Gazzaley,et al.  Functional interactions between prefrontal and visual association cortex contribute to top-down modulation of visual processing. , 2007, Cerebral cortex.

[30]  Zhaoping Li,et al.  Psychophysical Tests of the Hypothesis of a Bottom-Up Saliency Map in Primary Visual Cortex , 2007, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[31]  Joseph Krummenacher,et al.  Expectancies modulate attentional capture by salient color singletons , 2008, Vision Research.

[32]  L. Zhaoping.  Attention capture by eye of origin singletons even without awareness--a hallmark of a bottom-up saliency map in the primary visual cortex. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[33]  H. Müller,et al.  Attentional capture by salient color singleton distractors is modulated by top-down dimensional set. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[34]  Joseph Krummenacher,et al.  Display probability modulates attentional capture by onset distractors. , 2010, Journal of vision.

[35]  Dov Sagi,et al.  How do flankers' relations affect crowding? , 2010, Journal of vision.

[36]  J. Theeuwes.  Top-down and bottom-up control of visual selection. , 2010, Acta psychologica.

[37]  L. Chelazzi,et al.  Behavioral/systems/cognitive Reward Changes Salience in Human Vision via the Anterior Cingulate , 2022 .

[38]  Jan Theeuwes,et al.  On the limits of top-down control of visual selection , 2011, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[39]  Joy J. Geng,et al.  Contextual Knowledge Configures Attentional Control Networks , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[40]  Jan Theeuwes,et al.  On the limits of top-down control of visual selection , 2011, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[41]  G. Cumming.  Understanding the New Statistics: Effect Sizes, Confidence Intervals, and Meta-Analysis , 2011 .

[42]  Zhaoping Li,et al.  Neural Activities in V1 Create a Bottom-Up Saliency Map , 2012, Neuron.

[43]  J. Theeuwes,et al.  Top-down versus bottom-up attentional control: a failed theoretical dichotomy , 2012, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[44]  Katharina N. Seidl,et al.  Neural Evidence for Distracter Suppression during Visual Search in Real-World Scenes , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[45]  Marika Berchicci,et al.  Benefits of Physical Exercise on the Aging Brain: The Role of the Prefrontal Cortex , 2013, The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences.

[46]  Joy J. Geng,et al.  Attentional Mechanisms of Distractor Suppression , 2014 .

[47]  Michael Zehetleitner,et al.  Probability cueing of distractor locations: both intertrial facilitation and statistical learning mediate interference reduction , 2014, Front. Psychol..

[48]  L. Chelazzi,et al.  Altering Spatial Priority Maps via Reward-Based Learning , 2014, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[49]  Howard E Egeth,et al.  When does feature search fail to protect against attentional capture? , 2015, Visual cognition.

[50]  Dirk Kerzel,et al.  Distractor rejection in visual search breaks down with more than a single distractor feature. , 2016, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[51]  Yoolim Hong,et al.  Implicitly learned suppression of irrelevant spatial locations , 2016, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[52]  Jeremy M Wolfe,et al.  Visual Attention: Size Matters , 2017, Current Biology.

[53]  Jan Theeuwes,et al.  Statistical Regularities Modulate Attentional Capture , 2018, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[54]  Jan Theeuwes,et al.  How to inhibit a distractor location? Statistical learning versus active, top-down suppression , 2018, Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics.

[55]  Jan Theeuwes,et al.  Selection history: How reward modulates selectivity of visual attention , 2017, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.

[56]  Nicholas Gaspelin,et al.  Distinguishing Among Potential Mechanisms of Singleton Suppression , 2017, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[57]  Jan Theeuwes,et al.  Statistical regularities modulate attentional capture independent of search strategy , 2018, Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics.

[58]  Joy J. Geng,et al.  Evidence for Second-Order Singleton Suppression Based on Probabilistic Expectations , 2018, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[59]  Jan Theeuwes,et al.  Anticipatory distractor suppression elicited by statistical regularities in visual search , 2019, bioRxiv.

[60]  Heinrich René Liesefeld,et al.  Learning to suppress salient distractors in the target dimension: Region-based inhibition is persistent and transfers to distractors in a nontarget dimension. , 2019, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[61]  Jan Theeuwes,et al.  More capture, more suppression: Distractor suppression due to statistical regularities is determined by the magnitude of attentional capture , 2019, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.

[62]  Brett Bahle,et al.  Feature-Based Statistical Regularities of Distractors Modulate Attentional Capture , 2019, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[63]  Jan Theeuwes,et al.  Statistical regularities induce spatial as well as feature-specific suppression. , 2019, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[64]  Jan Theeuwes,et al.  Goal-driven, stimulus-driven, and history-driven selection. , 2019, Current opinion in psychology.

[65]  Heinrich R Liesefeld,et al.  Modulations of saliency signals at two hierarchical levels of priority computation revealed by spatial statistical distractor learning. , 2020, Journal of experimental psychology. General.