Sequence analysis and structure prediction of 23S rRNA:m1G methyltransferases reveals a conserved core augmented with a putative Zn-binding domain in the N-terminus and family-specific elaborations in the C-terminus.

N1-methylation of G748 within 23S ribosomal RNA results in resistance to the macrolide tylosin in Streptomyces. In contrast, the Escherichia coli mutant lacking N1-methylation of G745 exhibits increased resistance to viomycin, in addition to severe defects of growth characteristics. Both methylated guanines are located in hairpin 35, in domain II of prokaryotic 23S rRNA. G748 and G745 are modified by related S-adenosylmethionine-dependent methyltransferases (MTases), TlrB and RrmA respectively. Earlier sequence comparisons allowed identification of the AdoMet-binding site, however the catalytic site and the target-recognition region of these enzymes could not be delineated unambiguously. In this work, we carried out sequence-to-structure threading of the rRNA:m1G MTase family against the database of known structures to Identify those "missing regions". Our analysis confirms the earlier prediction of the AdoMet-binding site, but suggests a different location of the putative catalytic center than was previously postulated. We predict that RrmA and TlrB possess two regions that may be responsible for specific interactions with their target nucleic acid sequences: a putative Zn-finger domain in the N-terminus and the variable domain close to the C-terminus, which indicates that 23S rRNA MTases exhibit the primary structural organization distinct from other nucleic acid MTases, despite sharing the common catalytic domain.

[1]  D. Tollervey,et al.  Yeast 18S rRNA Dimethylase Dim1p: a Quality Control Mechanism in Ribosome Synthesis? , 1998, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[2]  C. P. Buul,et al.  Nucleotide sequence of the ksgA gene of Escherichia coli: comparison of methyltransferases effecting dimethylation of adenosine in ribosomal RNA. , 1985 .

[3]  W. Saenger,et al.  M.TaqI: possible catalysis via cation-pi interactions in N-specific DNA methyltransferases. , 1998, Biological chemistry.

[4]  J. Bujnicki.  Sequence, structural, and evolutionary analysis of prokaryotic ribosomal protein L11 methyltransferases. , 2000, Acta microbiologica Polonica.

[5]  A. Godzik,et al.  Comparison of sequence profiles. Strategies for structural predictions using sequence information , 2008, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[6]  C. V. van Buul,et al.  Nucleotide sequence of the ksgA gene of Escherichia coli: comparison of methyltransferases effecting dimethylation of adenosine in ribosomal RNA. , 1985, Gene.

[7]  J. Bujnicki,et al.  Molecular evolution of DNA-(cytosine-N4) methyltransferases: evidence for their polyphyletic origin. , 1999, Nucleic acids research.

[8]  G. V. van Wezel,et al.  The tylosin resistance gene tlrB of Streptomyces fradiae encodes a methyltransferase that targets G748 in 23S rRNA , 2000, Molecular microbiology.

[9]  D. Draper,et al.  Protein-RNA recognition. , 1995, Annual review of biochemistry.

[10]  D. Santi,et al.  Exposition of a family of RNA m(5)C methyltransferases from searching genomic and proteomic sequences. , 1999, Nucleic acids research.

[11]  J. Vandenhaute,et al.  The 18S rRNA dimethylase Dim1p is required for pre-ribosomal RNA processing in yeast. , 1995, Genes & development.

[12]  Claes Gustafsson,et al.  Identification of the rrmA Gene Encoding the 23S rRNA m1G745 Methyltransferase in Escherichia coli and Characterization of an m1G745-Deficient Mutant , 1998, Journal of bacteriology.

[13]  Liam J. McGuffin,et al.  The PSIPRED protein structure prediction server , 2000, Bioinform..

[14]  P. Limbach,et al.  Summary: the modified nucleosides of RNA. , 1994, Nucleic acids research.

[15]  D Fischer,et al.  Hybrid fold recognition: combining sequence derived properties with evolutionary information. , 1999, Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing.

[16]  Geoffrey J. Barton,et al.  JPred : a consensus secondary structure prediction server , 1999 .

[17]  J. Thompson,et al.  The CLUSTAL_X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. , 1997, Nucleic acids research.

[18]  R J Roberts,et al.  Predictive motifs derived from cytosine methyltransferases. , 1989, Nucleic acids research.

[19]  S. Clarke,et al.  RNase treatment of yeast and mammalian cell extracts affects in vitro substrate methylation by type I protein arginine N-methyltransferases. , 1999, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[20]  D. Santi,et al.  Identification of new RNA modifying enzymes by iterative genome search using known modifying enzymes as probes. , 1996, Nucleic acids research.

[21]  A. Hinnebusch,et al.  The Gcd10p/Gcd14p complex is the essential two-subunit tRNA(1-methyladenosine) methyltransferase of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[22]  J. Bujnicki,et al.  Prediction of a novel RNA 2'-O-ribose methyltransferase subfamily encoded by the Escherichia coli YgdE open reading frame and its orthologs. , 2000, Acta microbiologica Polonica.

[23]  R. Blumenthal,et al.  Structure-guided analysis reveals nine sequence motifs conserved among DNA amino-methyltransferases, and suggests a catalytic mechanism for these enzymes. , 1995, Journal of molecular biology.

[24]  A. Bechthold,et al.  Overexpression of the thiostrepton-resistance gene from Streptomyces azureus in Escherichia coli and characterization of recognition sites of the 23S rRNA A1067 2'-methyltransferase in the guanosine triphosphatase center of 23S ribosomal RNA. , 1994, European journal of biochemistry.

[25]  J Lundström,et al.  Pcons: A neural‐network–based consensus predictor that improves fold recognition , 2001, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[26]  N. Saitou,et al.  The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. , 1987, Molecular biology and evolution.

[27]  M. Sternberg,et al.  Enhanced genome annotation using structural profiles in the program 3D-PSSM. , 2000, Journal of molecular biology.

[28]  William R. Taylor,et al.  The rapid generation of mutation data matrices from protein sequences , 1992, Comput. Appl. Biosci..

[29]  E. Cundliffe,et al.  Sites of action of two ribosomal RNA methylases responsible for resistance to aminoglycosides. , 1987, Journal of molecular biology.

[30]  B Efron,et al.  Statistical Data Analysis in the Computer Age , 1991, Science.

[31]  D Fischer,et al.  LiveBench‐1: Continuous benchmarking of protein structure prediction servers , 2001, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[32]  R. Blumenthal,et al.  S-adenosylmethionine-dependent methyltransferases : structures and functions , 1999 .

[33]  Marc Pignot,et al.  Structure of the N6-adenine DNA methyltransferase M•TaqI in complex with DNA and a cofactor analog , 2001, Nature Structural Biology.

[34]  R. Blumenthal,et al.  Structure of pvu II DNA-(cytosine N4) methyltransferase, an example of domain permutation and protein fold assignment. , 1997, Nucleic acids research.

[35]  R. Roberts,et al.  Hhal methyltransferase flips its target base out of the DNA helix , 1994, Cell.

[36]  J M Bujnicki,et al.  Phylogenomic analysis of 16S rRNA:(guanine‐N2) methyltransferases suggests new family members and reveals highly conserved motifs and a domain structure similar to other nucleic acid amino‐methyltransferases , 2000, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[37]  E. Fauman,et al.  RNA methylation under heat shock control. , 2000, Molecular cell.