Seismic reliability of steel moment resisting framed buildings retrofitted with buckling restrained braces

SUMMARY The present paper investigates the seismic reliability of the application of buckling restrained braces (BRBs) for seismic retrofitting of steel moment resisting framed buildings through fragility analysis. Samples of regular three-storey and eight-storey steel moment resisting frames were designed with lateral stiffness insufficient to comply with the code drift limitations imposed for steel moment resisting frame systems in earthquake-prone regions. The frames were then retrofitted with concentrically chevron conventional braces and BRBs. To obtain robust estimators of the seismic reliability, a database including a wide range of natural earthquake ground motion records with markedly different characteristics was used in the fragility analysis. Nonlinear time history analyses were utilized to analyze the structures subjected to these earthquake records. The improvement of seismic reliability achieved through the use of conventional braces and BRBs was evaluated by comparing the fragility curves of the three-storey and eight-storey model frames before and after retrofits, considering the probabilities of four distinct damage states. Moreover, the feasibility of mitigating the seismic response of moment resisting steel structures by using conventional braces and BRBs was determined through seismic risk analysis. The results obtained indicate that both conventional braces and especially BRBs improve significantly the seismic behavior of the original building by increasing the median values of the structural fragility curves and reducing the probabilities of exceedance of each damage state. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  T. Jordan,et al.  OpenSHA: A Developing Community-modeling Environment for Seismic Hazard Analysis , 2003 .

[2]  Amr S. Elnashai,et al.  Seismic retrofitting of framed structures with stainless steel , 2006 .

[3]  Jinkoo Kim,et al.  BEHAVIOR AND DESIGN OF STRUCTURES WITH BUCKLING-RESTRAINED BRACES , 2004 .

[4]  T. T. Soong,et al.  Supplemental energy dissipation: state-of-the-art and state-of-the- practice , 2002 .

[5]  Farzad Naeim,et al.  The performance of Tall buildings during the 21 September 1999 Chi‐Chi earthquake, Taiwan , 2000 .

[6]  Gerardo M. Verderame,et al.  Seismic risk of R.C. building classes , 2007 .

[7]  Douglas A. Foutch,et al.  Modeling of steel moment frames for seismic loads , 2002 .

[8]  Bruce R. Ellingwood,et al.  Earthquake risk assessment of building structures , 2001, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[9]  Peter W. Clark,et al.  Large-Scale Testing of Steel Unbonded Braces for Energy Dissipation , 2000 .

[10]  Ker-Chun Lin,et al.  Seismic reliability of steel framed buildings , 2010 .

[11]  Eiichi Watanabe,et al.  Performances and damages to steel structures during the 1995 Hyogoken-Nanbu earthquake , 1998 .

[12]  Kazuo Inoue,et al.  Classification of damage to steel buildings observed in the 1995 Hyogoken-Nanbu earthquake , 1998 .

[13]  Shozo Nakamura,et al.  Application of genetic algorithm to optimization of buckling restrained braces for seismic upgrading of existing structures , 2009 .

[14]  Vincenzo Piluso,et al.  Seismic reliability of V-braced frames: Influence of design methodologies , 2009 .

[15]  Michel Bruneau,et al.  Seismic design of steel buildings: Lessons from the 1995 Hyogo-ken Nanbu earthquake , 1996 .

[16]  Stephen A. Mahin,et al.  Lessons from damage to steel buildings during the Northridge earthquake , 1998 .

[17]  R. Mcguire.  Probabilistic seismic hazard analysis and design earthquakes: Closing the loop , 1995, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[18]  Vincenzo Piluso,et al.  Plastic Design of Seismic Resistant V-Braced Frames , 2008 .

[19]  Durgesh C. Rai,et al.  Seismic evaluation and upgrading of chevron braced frames , 2003 .

[20]  Michel Bruneau,et al.  Performance of steel structures during the 1994 Northridge earthquake , 1995 .

[21]  Nicos Makris,et al.  Component Testing, Seismic Evaluation and Characterization of Buckling-Restrained Braces , 2004 .

[22]  Amr S. Elnashai,et al.  Innovative strategies for seismic retrofitting of steel and composite structures , 2005 .

[23]  Qiang Xie,et al.  State of the art of buckling-restrained braces in Asia , 2005 .

[24]  Vincenzo Piluso,et al.  Seismic reliability of traditional and innovative concentrically braced frames , 2011 .

[25]  G. Ravi Kumar,et al.  Behaviour of frames with Non-Buckling bracings under earthquake loading , 2007 .

[26]  C. Cornell.  Engineering seismic risk analysis , 1968 .

[27]  Hanbin Ge,et al.  A seismic upgrading method for steel arch bridges using buckling‐restrained braces , 2005 .

[28]  Amr S. Elnashai,et al.  The effect of material and ground motion uncertainty on the seismic vulnerability curves of RC structure , 2006 .

[29]  Andrew S. Whittaker,et al.  Retrofit of pre‐Northridge steel moment‐resisting frames using fluid viscous dampers , 2001 .

[30]  Robert Tremblay,et al.  Inelastic seismic response of steel bracing members , 2002 .