Impact of PET Staging in Limited-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Introduction: Although positron emission tomography computed tomography (PET-CT) has been widely used for small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) staging, no study has examined the clinical impact of PET staging in limited-stage (LS) SCLC. Methods: We identified patients with LS-SCLC treated definitively with concurrent chemoradiation. Outcomes were assessed using the Kaplan–Meier approach, Cox regression, and competing risks method. Results: We treated 54 consecutive LS-SCLC patients with concurrent chemoradiation from January 2002 to August 2010. Forty underwent PET, 14 did not, and all underwent thoracoabdominopelvic CT and magnetic resonance imaging neuroimaging. Most patient characteristics were balanced between the comparison groups, including age, race, sex, bone scanning, median dosage, and performance status. More number of PET-staged patients presented with nodal metastases (p = 0.05). Median follow-up was similar for PET-staged and non–PET-staged patients (p = 0.59). Median overall survival from diagnosis in PET-staged patients was 32 versus 17 months in patients staged without PET (p = 0.03), and 3-year survival was 47% versus 19%. Median time-to-distant failure was 29 versus 12 months (p = 0.04); median time-to-local failure was not reached versus 16 months (p = 0.04). On multivariable analysis, PET staging (odds ratio [OR] = 0.24; p = 0.04), performance status (OR = 1.89; p = 0.05), and N-stage (OR = 4.94; p < 0.01) were associated with survival. Conclusion: LS-SCLC patients staged with PET exhibited improved disease control and survival when compared with non–PET-staged LS-SCLC patients. Improved staging accuracy and better identification of intrathoracic disease may explain these findings, underscoring the value of PET-CT in these patients.

[1]  A R Feinstein,et al.  The Will Rogers phenomenon. Stage migration and new diagnostic techniques as a source of misleading statistics for survival in cancer. , 1985, The New England journal of medicine.

[2]  J. Herndon,et al.  Comparison of whole-body FDG-PET to bone scan for detection of bone metastases in patients with a new diagnosis of lung cancer. , 2004, Lung cancer.

[3]  F. Aversa,et al.  Competing risk analysis using R: an easy guide for clinicians , 2007, Bone Marrow Transplantation.

[4]  N. Gupta,et al.  Can positron emission tomography be used as a staging tool for small-cell lung cancer? , 2008, Clinical lung cancer.

[5]  Thatcher,et al.  The Value of Anatomic Staging and Other Prognostic Factors in Small Cell Lung Cancer Management: A View of European Studies. , 1995, Seminars in radiation oncology.

[6]  E. Stoelben,et al.  Impact of [18F]FDG-PET on the primary staging of small-cell lung cancer , 2004, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[7]  Jeffrey D Bradley,et al.  Positron emission tomography in limited-stage small-cell lung cancer: a prospective study. , 2004, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[8]  E. Van Cutsem,et al.  Cetuximab plus irinotecan, fluorouracil, and leucovorin as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: updated analysis of overall survival according to tumor KRAS and BRAF mutation status. , 2011, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[9]  Suresh Senan,et al.  Critical review of PET-CT for radiotherapy planning in lung cancer. , 2005, Critical reviews in oncology/hematology.

[10]  S. Ho,et al.  Whole-body 18F-2-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography in primary staging small cell lung cancer. , 2002, Anticancer research.

[11]  Edward L Spitznagel,et al.  Changing epidemiology of small-cell lung cancer in the United States over the last 30 years: analysis of the surveillance, epidemiologic, and end results database. , 2006, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[12]  C. Steer,et al.  Management of small cell lung cancer , 2001, Expert review of anticancer therapy.

[13]  Y. Ung,et al.  An Ontario Clinical Oncology Group (OCOG) randomized trial (PET START) of FDG PET/CT in patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): Predictors of overall survival. , 2011, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[14]  C. Faivre-Finn,et al.  The role of positron emission tomography in management of small cell lung cancer. , 2011, Lung cancer.

[15]  Matthias T Wyss,et al.  Whole-body (18)F-FDG PET improves the management of patients with small cell lung cancer. , 2003, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[16]  N. Saijo,et al.  Prognostic factors and prognostic staging system for small cell lung cancer. , 1997, Japanese journal of clinical oncology.

[17]  D. Podoloff,et al.  Comparison of bone and 2-deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-D-glucose positron emission tomography in the evaluation of bony metastases in lung cancer. , 2003, Molecular imaging and biology : MIB : the official publication of the Academy of Molecular Imaging.

[18]  D. Ball,et al.  Impact of Positron Emission Tomography on the Management of Patients With Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Preliminary Experience , 2004, American journal of clinical oncology.

[19]  H. Steinert,et al.  Whole-Body 18F-FDG PET Improves the Management of Patients with Small Cell Lung Cancer , 2003 .