Three-dimensional motion analysis of the cervical spine for comparison of anterior cervical decompression and fusion versus artificial disc replacement in 17 patients: clinical article.

OBJECT Cervical arthroplasty with an artificial disc (AD) has emerged as an alternative to anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) for the management of cervical spondylosis. This study aims to provide 3D motion analysis data comparing patients after ACDF and AD replacement. METHODS Ten patients who underwent C5-6 ACDF and 7 who underwent C5-6 AD replacement were enrolled. Using biplanar fluoroscopy and a model-based track technique (accurate up to 0.6 mm and 0.6°), motion analysis of axial rotation and flexion-extension of the neck was performed. Three nonoperative segments (C3-4, C4-5, and C6-7) were assessed for both intervertebral rotation (coronal, sagittal, and axial planes) and facet shear (anteroposterior and mediolateral). RESULTS There was no difference in total neck motion comparing ACDF and AD replacement for neck extension (43.3° ± 10.2° vs 44.3° ± 12.6°, p = 0.866) and rotation (36.0° ± 6.5° vs 38.2° ± 9.3°, p = 0.576). For extension, when measured as a percentage of total neck motion, there was a greater amount of rotation at the nonoperated segments in the ACDF group than in the AD group (p = 0.003). When comparing specific motion segments, greater normalized rotation was seen in the ACDF group at C3-4 (33.2% ± 4.9% vs 26.8% ± 6.6%, p = 0.036) and C6-7 (28.5% ± 6.7% vs 20.5% ± 5.5%, p = 0.009) but not at C4-5 (33.5% ± 6.4% vs 31.8% ± 4.0%, p = 0.562). For neck rotation, greater rotation was observed at the nonoperative segments in the ACDF group than in the AD group (p = 0.024), but the differences between individual segments did not reach significance (p ≥ 0.146). Increased mediolateral facet shear was seen on neck extension with ACDF versus AD replacement (p = 0.008). Comparing each segment, C3-4 (0.9 ± 0.5 mm vs 0.4 ± 0.1 mm, p = 0.039) and C4-5 (1.0 ± 0.4 mm vs 0.5 ± 0.2 mm, p = 0.022) showed increased shear while C6-7 (1.0 ± 0.4 mm vs 1.0 ± 0.5 mm, p = 0.767) did not. CONCLUSIONS This study illustrates increased motion at nonoperative segments in patients who have undergone ACDF compared with those who have undergone AD replacement. Further studies will be required to examine whether these changes contribute to adjacent-segment disease.

[1]  L. Penning.  Normal movements of the cervical spine. , 1978, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[2]  Scott Tashman,et al.  Validation of a new model-based tracking technique for measuring three-dimensional, in vivo glenohumeral joint kinematics. , 2006, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[3]  Adam S. Kanter,et al.  Characterization of articulation of the lumbar facets in the human cadaveric spine using a facet-based coordinate system. , 2011, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[4]  J. Robertson,et al.  Assessment of adjacent-segment disease in patients treated with cervical fusion or arthroplasty: a prospective 2-year study. , 2005, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.

[5]  N. Duggal,et al.  ProDisc-C: An In Vivo Kinematic Study , 2011, Journal of spinal disorders & techniques.

[6]  Ilana Langdon,et al.  Influence of an artificial cervical joint compared with fusion on adjacent-level motion in the treatment of degenerative cervical disc disease. , 2002, Journal of neurosurgery.

[7]  M. Kelly,et al.  Adjacent Segment Motion After Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Versus ProDisc-C Cervical Total Disk Arthroplasty: Analysis from a Randomized, Controlled Trial , 2011, Spine.

[8]  Qun Xia,et al.  Lumbar Facet Joint Motion in Patients with Degenerative Disc Disease at Affected and Adjacent Levels: An In Vivo Biomechanical Study , 2011, Spine.

[9]  N Bogduk,et al.  The pathophysiology of disc degeneration: a critical review. , 2008, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[10]  P. Anderson,et al.  Motion Analysis of Bryan Cervical Disc Arthroplasty Versus Anterior Discectomy and Fusion: Results From a Prospective, Randomized, Multicenter, Clinical Trial , 2008, Journal of spinal disorders & techniques.

[11]  E. Akl,et al.  Anterior Cervical Discectomy with Arthroplasty versus Arthrodesis for Single-Level Cervical Spondylosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis , 2012, PloS one.

[12]  W C Hutton,et al.  Disc space narrowing and the lumbar facet joints. , 1984, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[13]  Gang Li,et al.  Range of Motion and Orientation of the Lumbar Facet Joints In Vivo , 2009, Spine.

[14]  P. Brinckmann,et al.  Vertebral height, disc height, posteroanterior displacement and dens-atlas gap in the cervical spine: precision measurement protocol and normal data. , 2002, Clinical biomechanics.

[15]  Kjell Arne Kvistad,et al.  Degeneration and height of cervical discs classified from MRI compared with precise height measurements from radiographs. , 2005, European journal of radiology.

[16]  Michael A. Finn,et al.  Local and global subaxial cervical spine biomechanics after single-level fusion or cervical arthroplasty , 2009, European Spine Journal.

[17]  Daniel C. Lu,et al.  Bioabsorbable Anterior Cervical Plating: Initial Multicenter Clinical and Radiographic Experience , 2007, Spine.

[18]  Joseph D. Smucker,et al.  Clinical Outcomes of BRYAN Cervical Disc Arthroplasty: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Multicenter Trial With 24-month Follow-up , 2007, Journal of spinal disorders & techniques.

[19]  K. Türeyen.  Disc height loss after anterior cervical microdiscectomy with titanium intervertebral cage fusion , 2003, Acta Neurochirurgica.

[20]  Jan Goffin,et al.  Long-Term Follow-Up After Interbody Fusion of the Cervical Spine , 2004, Journal of spinal disorders & techniques.

[21]  Mohamed R. Mahfouz,et al.  In Vivo Evaluation of Dynamic Characteristics of the Normal, Fused, and Disc Replacement Cervical Spines , 2007, Spine.

[22]  H. Wilke,et al.  Prediction of the human thoracic and lumbar articular facet joint morphometry from radiographic images , 2011, Journal of anatomy.

[23]  M. Panjabi,et al.  Facet Joint Kinematics and Injury Mechanisms During Simulated Whiplash , 2004, Spine.

[24]  J. Vital,et al.  Intermediate clinical and radiological results of cervical TDR (Mobi-C®) with up to 2 years of follow-up , 2009, European Spine Journal.

[25]  G. Andersson,et al.  Patterns of Height Changes in Anterior and Posterior Cervical Disc Regions Affects the Contact Loading at Posterior Facets During Moderate and Severe Disc Degeneration: A Poroelastic C5-C6 Finite Element Model Study , 2010, Spine.

[26]  Xueying Meng,et al.  Does disc space height of fused segment affect adjacent degeneration in ALIF? A finite element study. , 2011, Turkish neurosurgery.

[27]  M. Fink,et al.  Effect of arthroplasty design on cervical spine kinematics: analysis of the Bryan Disc, ProDisc-C, and Synergy disc. , 2010, Neurosurgical focus.

[28]  William C Welch,et al.  Contact pressure in the facet joint during sagittal bending of the cadaveric cervical spine. , 2011, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[29]  R. Delamarter,et al.  Spinal Fusion in the United States: Analysis of Trends From 1998 to 2008 , 2012, Spine.

[30]  S B Sepic,et al.  Anterior Cervical Fusion for Degenerated or Protruded Discs: A Review of One Hundred Forty-Six Patients , 1984, Spine.

[31]  P. Mummaneni,et al.  Analysis of the three United States Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption cervical arthroplasty trials. , 2012, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.

[32]  P. Anderson,et al.  Quality of Spinal Motion With Cervical Disk Arthroplasty: Computer-aided Radiographic Analysis , 2010, Journal of spinal disorders & techniques.

[33]  M. Panjabi,et al.  Effects of Disc Injury on Mechanical Behavior of the Human Spine , 1984, Spine.

[34]  Narayan Yoganandan,et al.  Localized cervical facet joint kinematics under physiological and whiplash loading. , 2005, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.

[35]  Michael J Bey,et al.  Three-dimensional dynamic in vivo motion of the cervical spine: assessment of measurement accuracy and preliminary findings. , 2010, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[36]  L. Raghuram,et al.  Accelerated spondylotic changes adjacent to the fused segment following central cervical corpectomy: magnetic resonance imaging study evidence. , 2004, Journal of neurosurgery.

[37]  I. Stokes.  Three-dimensional terminology of spinal deformity. A report presented to the Scoliosis Research Society by the Scoliosis Research Society Working Group on 3-D terminology of spinal deformity. , 1994, Spine.

[38]  S. Kim,et al.  Comparison of radiographic changes after ACDF versus Bryan disc arthroplasty in single and bi-level cases , 2009, European Spine Journal.

[39]  S. Sepic,et al.  Roentgenographic Findings of the Cervical Spine in Asymptomatic People , 1986, Spine.

[40]  Manohar M. Panjabi,et al.  Cervical facet joint kinematics during bilateral facet dislocation , 2007, European Spine Journal.

[41]  A. Hilibrand,et al.  Adjacent Segment Pathology Following Cervical Motion-Sparing Procedures or Devices Compared With Fusion Surgery: A Systematic Review , 2012, Spine.

[42]  D. Chin,et al.  Accelerated L5-S1 Segment Degeneration after Spinal Fusion on and above L4-5 : Minimum 4-Year Follow-Up Results. , 2009, Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society.

[43]  Daniel K. Park,et al.  Index and Adjacent Level Kinematics After Cervical Disc Replacement and Anterior Fusion: In Vivo Quantitative Radiographic Analysis , 2011, Spine.

[44]  H. Baba,et al.  Late radiographic findings after anterior cervical fusion for spondylotic myeloradiculopathy. , 1993, Spine.

[45]  J. Bendo,et al.  Effect of intervertebral disc height on postoperative motion and clinical outcomes after Prodisc-C cervical disc replacement. , 2009, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[46]  K. Nakanishi,et al.  Strain on intervertebral discs after anterior cervical decompression and fusion. , 1999, Spine.

[47]  R. Watkins,et al.  Comparison of Disc Space Heights after Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion , 1989, Spine.

[48]  M M Panjabi,et al.  Functional Radiographic Diagnosis of the Cervical Spine: Flexion/Extension , 1988, Spine.

[49]  William C Welch,et al.  Spinal facet joint biomechanics and mechanotransduction in normal, injury and degenerative conditions. , 2011, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[50]  P. Suetens,et al.  Longitudinal Prospective Long‐term Radiographic Follow‐up After Treatment of Single‐Level Cervical Disk Disease With the Bryan Cervical Disc , 2010, Neurosurgery.

[51]  M M Panjabi,et al.  A technique for measurement and description of three-dimensional six degree-of-freedom motion of a body joint with an application to the human spine. , 1981, Journal of biomechanics.

[52]  S. Emery,et al.  Robinson anterior cervical discectomy and arthrodesis for cervical radiculopathy. Long-term follow-up of one hundred and twenty-two patients. , 1993, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[53]  Alessandro Bozzao,et al.  Effect of cervical dynamics on adjacent segment degeneration after anterior cervical fusion with cages , 2009, Neurosurgical Review.

[54]  M. Fernández-Fairen,et al.  Anterior Cervical Fusion With Tantalum Implant: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study , 2008, Spine.

[55]  W. Hitzl,et al.  4- and 5-level anterior fusions of the cervical spine: review of literature and clinical results , 2007, European Spine Journal.

[56]  Tae-Hong Lim,et al.  Biomechanical Study on the Effect of Cervical Spine Fusion on Adjacent-Level Intradiscal Pressure and Segmental Motion , 2002, Spine.

[57]  P. Suchomel,et al.  Clinical results and development of heterotopic ossification in total cervical disc replacement during a 4-year follow-up , 2010, European Spine Journal.

[58]  M. Bernstein,et al.  Surgical innovation or surgical evolution: an ethical and practical guide to handling novel neurosurgical procedures. , 2004, Journal of neurosurgery.

[59]  T. Zdeblick,et al.  A Quantitative Analysis of Strain at Adjacent Segments After Segmental Immobilization of the Cervical Spine , 2006, Journal of spinal disorders & techniques.

[60]  Annie L. Raich,et al.  Kinematics of the Cervical Adjacent Segments After Disc Arthroplasty Compared With Anterior Discectomy and Fusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis , 2012, Spine.

[61]  John L. Williams,et al.  Late results of cervical discectomy and interbody fusion: some factors influencing the results. , 1968, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[62]  D. Ohnmeiss,et al.  Prospective, randomized, multicenter study of cervical arthroplasty: 269 patients from the Kineflex|C artificial disc investigational device exemption study with a minimum 2-year follow-up: clinical article. , 2011, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.

[63]  P. Nunley,et al.  Factors Affecting the Incidence of Symptomatic Adjacent-Level Disease in Cervical Spine After Total Disc Arthroplasty: 2- to 4-Year Follow-up of 3 Prospective Randomized Trials , 2012, Spine.

[64]  Regis W Haid,et al.  Clinical and radiographic analysis of cervical disc arthroplasty compared with allograft fusion: a randomized controlled clinical trial. , 2007, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.

[65]  D. Coric,et al.  Prospective randomized study of cervical arthroplasty and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with long-term follow-up: results in 74 patients from a single site. , 2013, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.

[66]  Gregory P. Lee,et al.  Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Associated Complications , 2007, Spine.

[67]  Y. Iwasaki,et al.  Long-term follow-up results in patients with cervical disk disease treated by cervical anterior fusion using titanium cage implants. , 2008, Neurologia medico-chirurgica.

[68]  M. Fink,et al.  Analysis of in vivo kinematics of 3 different cervical devices: Bryan disc, ProDisc-C, and Prestige LP disc. , 2011, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.

[69]  A. Hilibrand,et al.  Radiculopathy and myelopathy at segments adjacent to the site of a previous anterior cervical arthrodesis. , 1999, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[70]  K. Kafchitsas,et al.  Effect of lumbar disc replacement on the height of the disc space and the geometry of the facet joints: a cadaver study. , 2010, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[71]  J. Dvorak,et al.  In vivo flexion/extension of the normal cervical spine , 1991, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.