Outline of a Generalization of Kinetic Theory to Study Opinion Dynamics

This paper presents an analytic framework to study the dynamics of the opinion in multi-agent systems. In the proposed framework, each agent is associated with an attribute which represents its opinion, and the opinion of an agent changes because of interactions with other agents, without supervised coordination. Each interaction involves only two agents, and it corresponds to an exchange of messages. The framework assumes that time is modeled as a sequence of discrete steps, which do not necessarily have the same duration, and that at each step two random agents interact. Various sociological phenomena can be incorporated in the proposed framework, and the framework allows studying macroscopic properties of a system starting from microscopic models of such phenomena, obtaining analytic results. In detail, the proposed framework is inspired by the kinetic theory of gas mixtures, which relies on the use of balance equations that can be properly adopted to study opinion dynamics in a multi-agent system. After a short introduction on the kinetic theory of gas mixtures, this paper shows how the main ideas behind it can be generalized to study the dynamics of the opinion in multi-agent systems starting from a detailed description of microscopic interactions among agents.

[1]  S. Galam,et al.  Sociophysics: A new approach of sociological collective behaviour. I. mean‐behaviour description of a strike , 1982, 2211.07041.

[2]  F. Schweitzer,et al.  Modelling collective opinion formation by means of active Brownian particles , 1999, adap-org/9911005.

[3]  Federico Bergenti,et al.  An analytic study of opinion dynamics in multi-agent systems , 2017, Comput. Math. Appl..

[4]  Federico Bergenti,et al.  Opinion dynamics in multi-agent systems: selected analytic models and verifying simulations , 2017, Comput. Math. Organ. Theory.

[5]  Federico Bergenti,et al.  A Kinetic Study of Opinion Dynamics in Multi-agent Systems , 2015, AI*IA.

[6]  B. Latané,et al.  From private attitude to public opinion: A dynamic theory of social impact. , 1990 .

[7]  A. Flache,et al.  Differentiation without Distancing. Explaining Bi-Polarization of Opinions without Negative Influence , 2013, PloS one.

[8]  Federico Bergenti,et al.  Kinetic Description of Opinion Evolution in Multi-agent Systems: Analytic Model and Simulations , 2015, PRIMA.

[9]  Lorenzo Pareschi,et al.  Reviews , 2014 .

[10]  Rainer Hegselmann,et al.  Opinion dynamics and bounded confidence: models, analysis and simulation , 2002, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul..

[11]  Raul Toral,et al.  Noisy continuous-opinion dynamics , 2009, 0906.0441.

[12]  Dietrich Stauffer,et al.  Crossover in the Cont–Bouchaud percolation model for market fluctuations , 1998 .

[13]  Federico Bergenti,et al.  Simulations of Opinion Formation in Multi-Agent Systems Using Kinetic Theory , 2015, WOA.

[14]  G. Toscani,et al.  Kinetic models of opinion formation , 2006 .

[15]  Federico Bergenti,et al.  Analytic Study of Opinion Dynamics in Multi-Agent Systems with Two Classes of Agents , 2016, WOA.

[16]  Wolfgang Weidlich,et al.  Sociodynamics: a Systematic Approach to Mathematical Modelling in the Social Sciences , 2000 .

[17]  Dirk Helbing,et al.  Individualization as Driving Force of Clustering Phenomena in Humans , 2010, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[18]  Federico Bergenti,et al.  An Analytic Study of Opinion Dynamics in Multi-agent Systems with Additive Random Noise , 2016, AI*IA.

[19]  Federico Bergenti,et al.  A Study of Consensus Formation using Kinetic Theory , 2016, DCAI.

[20]  Eric Bonabeau,et al.  Agent-based modeling: Methods and techniques for simulating human systems , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.