Experimental Evaluation of Group Communications Protocols for Tactical Data Dissemination

Network-centric warfare depends on the timely dissemination of battlefield information for Situation Awareness (SA) and Command and Control (C2). A significant percentage of SA and C2 data is sent to multiple recipients at the same time, which naturally calls for group communication protocols for efficient dissemination. Several variations of group communication protocols have been developed, including multicast-based and message bus-based approaches. However, a natural question arises about the suitability and performance of these protocols when deployed on tactical edge networks. These networks are typically wireless and characterized as Disrupted, Intermittent, and, Limited (DIL), with frequent disconnections and dynamic topologies. Constraints on bandwidth and variable latencies also complicate the environment. To answer the above question, we evaluate a number of group communications protocols in a realistic emulated tactical networking environment using the Anglova scenario. This paper presents results obtained from running different protocols in an experiment involving the dissemination of blue-force data for SA, with the objective of identifying advantages and disadvantages of different available solutions.

[1]  Cesare Stefanelli,et al.  Peer-to-peer communications for tactical environments: Observations, requirements, and experiences , 2010, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[2]  Waldemar Quevedo,et al.  The NATS Protocol , 2018 .

[3]  Jan Nilsson,et al.  A realistic military scenario and emulation environment for experimenting with tactical communications and heterogeneous networks , 2016, 2016 International Conference on Military Communications and Information Systems (ICMCIS).

[4]  Abhinandan Das,et al.  SWIM: scalable weakly-consistent infection-style process group membership protocol , 2002, Proceedings International Conference on Dependable Systems and Networks.

[5]  Valeriu Manuel Ionescu The analysis of the performance of RabbitMQ and ActiveMQ , 2015, 2015 14th RoEduNet International Conference - Networking in Education and Research (RoEduNet NER).

[6]  Anders Hansson,et al.  The angloval tactical military scenario and experimentation environment , 2018, 2018 International Conference on Military Communications and Information Systems (ICMCIS).

[7]  Matti Paksula,et al.  Introduction to store data in Redis, a persistent and fast key-value database , 2011 .

[8]  Rômulo Silva de Oliveira,et al.  Cloud IEC 61850: DDS Performance in Virtualized Environment with OpenDDS , 2017, 2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer and Information Technology (CIT).