Tracking neural coding of perceptual and semantic features of concrete nouns

We present a methodological approach employing magnetoencephalography (MEG) and machine learning techniques to investigate the flow of perceptual and semantic information decodable from neural activity in the half second during which the brain comprehends the meaning of a concrete noun. Important information about the cortical location of neural activity related to the representation of nouns in the human brain has been revealed by past studies using fMRI. However, the temporal sequence of processing from sensory input to concept comprehension remains unclear, in part because of the poor time resolution provided by fMRI. In this study, subjects answered 20 questions (e.g. is it alive?) about the properties of 60 different nouns prompted by simultaneous presentation of a pictured item and its written name. Our results show that the neural activity observed with MEG encodes a variety of perceptual and semantic features of stimuli at different times relative to stimulus onset, and in different cortical locations. By decoding these features, our MEG-based classifier was able to reliably distinguish between two different concrete nouns that it had never seen before. The results demonstrate that there are clear differences between the time course of the magnitude of MEG activity and that of decodable semantic information. Perceptual features were decoded from MEG activity earlier in time than semantic features, and features related to animacy, size, and manipulability were decoded consistently across subjects. We also observed that regions commonly associated with semantic processing in the fMRI literature may not show high decoding results in MEG. We believe that this type of approach and the accompanying machine learning methods can form the basis for further modeling of the flow of neural information during language processing and a variety of other cognitive processes.

[1]  F. N. David,et al.  Principles and procedures of statistics. , 1961 .

[2]  Friedemann Pulvermüller,et al.  Brain Signatures of Meaning Access in Action Word Recognition , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[3]  S. Taulu,et al.  Suppression of Interference and Artifacts by the Signal Space Separation Method , 2003, Brain Topography.

[4]  T. Rogers,et al.  Neural basis of category-specific semantic deficits for living things: evidence from semantic dementia, HSVE and a neural network model. , 2006, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[5]  Friedemann Pulvermüller,et al.  Understanding in an instant: Neurophysiological evidence for mechanistic language circuits in the brain , 2009, Brain and Language.

[6]  Michael A. Ford,et al.  Can I have a quick word? Early electrophysiological manifestations of psycholinguistic processes revealed by event-related regression analysis of the EEG , 2009, Biological Psychology.

[7]  Alex Martin,et al.  Semantic memory and the brain: structure and processes , 2001, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[8]  Bradford Z. Mahon,et al.  Concepts and categories: a cognitive neuropsychological perspective. , 2009, Annual review of psychology.

[9]  C. Price The anatomy of language: a review of 100 fMRI studies published in 2009 , 2010, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[10]  P. Nunez,et al.  On the Relationship of Synaptic Activity to Macroscopic Measurements: Does Co-Registration of EEG with fMRI Make Sense? , 2004, Brain Topography.

[11]  Kara D. Federmeier,et al.  Electrophysiology reveals semantic memory use in language comprehension , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[12]  Friedemann Pulvermüller,et al.  Category specificity in the processing of color-related and form-related words: An ERP study , 2006, NeuroImage.

[13]  Tom Michael Mitchell,et al.  Predicting Human Brain Activity Associated with the Meanings of Nouns , 2008, Science.

[14]  R. Ilmoniemi,et al.  Magnetoencephalography-theory, instrumentation, and applications to noninvasive studies of the working human brain , 1993 .

[15]  R. Cabeza,et al.  Imaging Cognition II: An Empirical Review of 275 PET and fMRI Studies , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[16]  F. Pulvermüller Brain reflections of words and their meaning , 2001, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[17]  Tom Michael Mitchell,et al.  From the SelectedWorks of Marcel Adam Just 2008 Using fMRI brain activation to identify cognitive states associated with perception of tools and dwellings , 2016 .

[18]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Zero-shot Learning with Semantic Output Codes , 2009, NIPS.

[19]  Jan Kujala,et al.  Localization of correlated network activity at the cortical level with MEG , 2008, NeuroImage.

[20]  H. Renvall,et al.  Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Blood Oxygenation Level-Dependent Signal and Magnetoencephalography Evoked Responses Yield Different Neural Functionality in Reading , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[21]  Dejan S. Milojicic,et al.  Open Cirrus: A Global Cloud Computing Testbed , 2010, Computer.

[22]  T. Rogers,et al.  Where do you know what you know? The representation of semantic knowledge in the human brain , 2007, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[23]  Sydney S. Cash,et al.  Decoding word and category-specific spatiotemporal representations from MEG and EEG , 2011, NeuroImage.

[24]  Thomas Witzel,et al.  Spatiotemporal cortical dynamics underlying abstract and concrete word reading , 2007, Human brain mapping.

[25]  R. Salmelin,et al.  Spatiotemporal Convergence of Semantic Processing in Reading and Speech Perception , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[26]  Matthew H. Davis,et al.  Imagery or meaning? Evidence for a semantic origin of category-specific brain activity in metabolic imaging , 2008, The European journal of neuroscience.

[27]  R. Ilmoniemi,et al.  Signal-space projection method for separating MEG or EEG into components , 1997, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[28]  S. Taulu,et al.  Spatiotemporal signal space separation method for rejecting nearby interference in MEG measurements , 2006, Physics in medicine and biology.

[29]  Trevor Hastie,et al.  The Elements of Statistical Learning , 2001 .

[30]  Vladimir Vovk,et al.  Kernel Ridge Regression , 2013, Empirical Inference.

[31]  Tom Michael Mitchell,et al.  A Neurosemantic Theory of Concrete Noun Representation Based on the Underlying Brain Codes , 2010, PloS one.

[32]  Patrick Suppes,et al.  Single-Trial Classification of MEG Recordings , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[33]  O. Hauk,et al.  Neurophysiological distinction of action words in the fronto‐central cortex , 2004, Human brain mapping.

[34]  B. Mesquita,et al.  Adjustment to Chronic Diseases and Terminal Illness Health Psychology : Psychological Adjustment to Chronic Disease , 2006 .

[35]  P Suppes,et al.  Invariance of brain-wave representations of simple visual images and their names. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[36]  R. Ilmoniemi,et al.  Interpreting magnetic fields of the brain: minimum norm estimates , 2006, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[37]  R. Salmelin Clinical neurophysiology of language: The MEG approach , 2007, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[38]  Y. Benjamini,et al.  THE CONTROL OF THE FALSE DISCOVERY RATE IN MULTIPLE TESTING UNDER DEPENDENCY , 2001 .

[39]  D. Cheyne,et al.  Spatiotemporal mapping of cortical activity accompanying voluntary movements using an event‐related beamforming approach , 2006, Human brain mapping.

[40]  J. Rodd,et al.  Anteromedial temporal cortex supports fine-grained differentiation among objects. , 2005, Cerebral cortex.