Setting boundaries of participation in environmental impact assessment

Abstract Public participation processes are touted as an effective way to increase the capacity and legitimacy of environmental assessment and the regulatory process that rely on them. Recent changes to the Canadian environmental assessment process narrowed the criteria for who can participate in environmental assessments from any who were interested to those who were most directly affected. This article examines the potential consequences of this change by exploring other areas of Canadian regulatory law where a similar directed affected test has been applied. This new standard risks institutionalizing the long-understood representational bias confronted by more diffuse interest like environmental protection. Restricting participation to the “directly affected” is far too narrow a test for processes like environmental assessment that are designed to determine the public interest.

[1]  Kristen Purcell,et al.  Public Participation and the Environment: Do We Know What Works? , 1999 .

[2]  F. Fischer.  Citizens, Experts, and the Environment: The Politics of Local Knowledge , 2000 .

[3]  C. O’faircheallaigh.  Public participation and environmental impact assessment: Purposes, implications, and lessons for public policy making , 2010 .

[4]  M. Olson,et al.  The Logic of Collective Action , 1965 .

[5]  Anil Graves,et al.  Who's in and why? A typology of stakeholder analysis methods for natural resource management. , 2009, Journal of environmental management.

[6]  Karin Bäckstrand,et al.  Civic Science for Sustainability: Reframing the Role of Experts, Policy-Makers and Citizens in Environmental Governance , 2003 .

[7]  P. Landres,et al.  Ethical implications of democratic theory for U.S. public participation in environmental impact assessment , 2012 .

[8]  Salvador Trinxet,et al.  Canadian Environmental Assessment Act , 2015 .

[9]  K. O’Doherty,et al.  Biobank governance: a lesson in trust , 2010 .

[10]  George Hoberg,et al.  Playing Defence: Early Responses to Conflict Expansion in the Oil Sands Policy Subsystem , 2011, Canadian Journal of Political Science.

[11]  T. Gunton,et al.  A new model for sustainable development: a case study of The Great Bear Rainforest regional plan , 2010 .

[12]  Arthur Goldhammer,et al.  Democratic Legitimacy: Impartiality, Reflexivity, Proximity , 2011 .

[13]  A. Booth,et al.  Why the public thinks natural resources public participation processes fail: A case study of British Columbia communities , 2011 .

[14]  Christopher Wood,et al.  Environmental Impact Assessment: A Comparative Review , 1995 .

[15]  Jane Bailey.  Reopening Law's Gate: Public Interest Standing and Access to Justice , 2011 .

[16]  Rebeca Macias.  Public Participation in Energy and Natural Resources Development: A Theory and Criteria for Evaluation , 2010 .

[17]  John R. Parkins,et al.  Public Participation as Public Debate: A Deliberative Turn in Natural Resource Management , 2005 .

[18]  Peter Cane.  An Introduction to Administrative Law , 1986 .

[19]  J. C. Day,et al.  Collaborative Planning in Complex Stakeholder Environments: An Evaluation of a Two-Tiered Collaborative Planning Model , 2010 .

[20]  G. Rowe,et al.  Evaluating Public-Participation Exercises: A Research Agenda , 2004 .

[21]  M. D. Carpini,et al.  Public deliberation, discursive participation, and citizen engagement: A review of the empirical literature , 2004 .

[22]  Mark E. Warren,et al.  Practices of Freedom: Governance-Driven Democratization , 2014 .

[23]  S. Arnstein,et al.  Ladder of Citizen Participation , 2020 .

[24]  M. Reed.  Stakeholder participation for environmental management: A literature review , 2008 .

[25]  Mark Lubell,et al.  Environmental Activism as Collective Action , 2002 .

[26]  Thomas C. Beierle.  Democracy in Practice: Public Participation in Environmental Decisions , 2010 .

[27]  K. Hanna.  Environmental Impact Assessment: Practice and Participation , 2009 .

[28]  Dennis F. Thompson.  Deliberative Democratic Theory and Empirical Political Science , 2008 .

[29]  P. Stern,et al.  Public Participation in Environmental Assessment and Decision Making , 2008 .

[30]  A. Przeworski,et al.  Democracy and the Limits of Self-Government , 2010 .

[31]  Not Directly Affected: Using the Law to Close the Door on Environmentalists , 1996 .

[32]  John Glasson,et al.  Introduction to Environmental Impact Assessment , 1999 .