Culture, context, and cognition: The Semantic Procedural Interface model of the self

Several studies have found evidence that social information processing is strongly influenced by the person either primarily defining his or her self as an autonomous entity (independent self-construal) or as related to other people (interdependent self-construal). In this chapter, we describe the psychological mechanisms by which independent and interdependent self-construals affect individual experience. We propose the Semantic Procedural Interface (SPI) model of the self, which distinguishes two such mechanisms. In addition to differences in the semantic content areas from which independent and interdependent self-construals arise (semantic application mechanism), there are also different procedural modes of thinking (procedural application mechanism) associated with them. Independent self-definitions coincide with the tendency to process stimuli unaffected by the context in which they appear. Relating the self to the social contexts within interdependent self-construals facilitates context-bounded thinking (i.e., processing stimuli by paying attention to their relation to the given context). The results of several experiments attesting to the value of the differentiation between both application mechanisms are presented. We discuss how far differences in information processing between members of different cultural groups can be traced back to the mechanisms described in the SPI model.

[1]  Bettina Hannover,et al.  Der Einfluss independenter und interdependenter Selbstkonstruktionen auf die Informationsverarbeitung im sozialen Kontext , 2002 .

[2]  K. Holyoak,et al.  Social reference points , 1983 .

[3]  R. Nisbett,et al.  PERSONALITY PROCESSES AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES Attending Holistically Versus Analytically: Comparing the Context Sensitivity of Japanese and Americans , 2004 .

[4]  Jack L. Vevea,et al.  The "I," the "we," and the "when": a meta-analysis of motivational primacy in self-definition. , 2002, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[5]  D. Trafimow,et al.  The Importance of Subjective Norms for a Minority of People: between Subjects and within-Subjects Analyses , 1996 .

[6]  John C. Turner,et al.  Self and Collective: Cognition and Social Context , 1994 .

[7]  R. Holland,et al.  Don't Stand So Close to Me , 2004, Psychological science.

[8]  Thomas Mussweiler,et al.  PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY BULLETIN Mussweiler / FOCUS OF SOCIAL COMPARISON Focus of Comparison as a Determinant of Assimilation Versus Contrast in Social Comparison , 2001 .

[9]  M. Lepper,et al.  Rethinking the value of choice: a cultural perspective on intrinsic motivation. , 1999, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[10]  M. Brewer,et al.  Who is this "We"? Levels of collective identity and self representations. , 1996 .

[11]  Michael W. Morris,et al.  How Does Culture Influence Conflict Resolution? A Dynamic Constructive Analysis , 2001 .

[12]  W. S. Rholes,et al.  Category accessibility and impression formation , 1977 .

[13]  H. Markus,et al.  The Cultural Psychology of Personality , 1998 .

[14]  H. Markus,et al.  THE DYNAMIC SELF-CONCEPT: A Social Psychological Perspective , 1987 .

[15]  J. G. Miller,et al.  Perceptions of social responsibilities in India and in the United States: moral imperatives or personal decisions? , 1990, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[16]  David Trafimow,et al.  How Priming the Private Self or Collective Self Affects the Relative Weights of Attitudes and Subjective Norms , 1998 .

[17]  U. Roeder,et al.  Cross-Cultural Variations in Identifying Embedded Figures , 2001 .

[18]  Bettina Hannover,et al.  Kultur, Selbstkonzept und Kognition , 2003 .

[19]  J. Berry.  Cultural variations in field dependence-independence. , 1991 .

[20]  D. Oyserman,et al.  Thinking about the self influences thinking in general: cognitive consequences of salient self-concept , 2002 .

[21]  Markus Kemmelmeier.  Individualism and Attitudes Toward Affirmative Action: Evidence From Priming Experiments , 2003 .

[22]  Constantine Sedikides,et al.  Portraits of the self , 2003 .

[23]  John C. Turner,et al.  Fluidity in the self-concept: the shift from personal to social identity , 2004 .

[24]  H. Markus,et al.  Possible Selves , 2001 .

[25]  S. Haberstroh,et al.  Self-construal activation and focus of comparison as determinants of assimilation and contrast in social comparisons. , 2004 .

[26]  Matthew Crosby,et al.  Individualism and Resistance to Affirmative Action: A Comparison of Japanese and American Samples1 , 1996 .

[27]  R. Nisbett,et al.  Causal attribution across cultures: Variation and universality. , 1999 .

[28]  D. Navon.  Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception , 1977, Cognitive Psychology.

[29]  J. Bargh.  The automaticity of everyday life. , 1997 .

[30]  D. R. Lehman,et al.  Culture and Positive Illusions in Close Relationships: How My Relationships Are Better than Yours , 2000 .

[31]  S. Cross,et al.  The relational-interdependent self-construal and relationships. , 2000, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[32]  S. Schwartz.  Universals in the Content and Structure of Values: Theoretical Advances and Empirical Tests in 20 Countries , 1992 .

[33]  Independentes und interdependentes Selbstwissen als Determinante von Assimilation und Kontrast bei kontextuellem Priming , 2000 .

[34]  Is the interdependent self a better communicator than the independent self? Self-construal and the observation of conversational norms , 2000 .

[35]  Teresa M. Amabile,et al.  Social Roles, Social Control and Biases in Social Perception , 1977 .

[36]  Norbert Schwarz,et al.  Assimilation and Contrast Effects in Part-Whole Question Sequences: A Conversational Logic Analysis , 1991 .

[37]  A. van Knippenberg,et al.  It takes two to mimic: behavioral consequences of self-construals. , 2003, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[38]  H. Markus,et al.  Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. , 1991 .

[39]  B. Hannover.  One man' poison ivy is another man's spinach: What self-clarity is in independent self-construal, a lack of context-dependency is in interdependent self-construal , 2002 .

[40]  Anne Springer,et al.  Implications of Independent Versus Interdependent Self-knowledge for Motivated Social Cognition: The Semantic Procedural Interface Model of the Self , 2005 .

[41]  R. Nisbett,et al.  Culture, control, and perception of relationships in the environment. , 2000, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[42]  B. Hannover,et al.  The semantic--procedural interface model of the self: the role of self-knowledge for context-dependent versus context-independent modes of thinking. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[43]  Siobhan Chapman.  Logic and Conversation , 2005 .

[44]  D. Trafimow,et al.  Some tests of the distinction between the private self and the collective self. , 1991 .

[45]  John C. Turner,et al.  Some current issues in research on social identity and self-categorization theories , 1999 .

[46]  C. Sedikides,et al.  A Homecoming to the Individual Self: Emotional and Motivational Primacy , 2001 .

[47]  J S Uleman,et al.  Spontaneous self-descriptions and ethnic identities in individualistic and collectivistic cultures. , 1995, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[48]  H. Markus.  Self-schemata and processing information about the self. , 1977 .

[49]  R. Nisbett,et al.  The cultural matrix of social psychology , 1998 .

[50]  Jeff T. Larsen,et al.  Perceiving an Object and Its Context in Different Cultures , 2003, Psychological science.

[51]  S. Fiske.  Social cognition and social perception. , 1993, Annual review of psychology.

[52]  Angela Y. Lee,et al.  “I” Value Freedom, but “We” Value Relationships: Self-Construal Priming Mirrors Cultural Differences in Judgment , 1999 .

[53]  H. Markus,et al.  Yin and Yang of the Japanese self: The cultural psychology of personality coherence. , 1999 .

[54]  D. Sperber,et al.  Relevance: Communication and cognition, 2nd ed. , 1995 .

[55]  S. Cousins.  Culture and selfhood in Japan and the U.S. , 1989 .

[56]  M. Kuhn,et al.  An empirical investigation of self-attitudes. , 1954 .