A prospective audit of the quality of documentation of gynaecological operations

There is a paucity of audits in the speciality of Obstetrics and Gynaecology to estimate the standard of documentation of operation notes. Evidence from several audits across all specialities indicates the overall standard of reporting and documentation in medicine is poor, with many reports failing to contain important and pertinent data. Various attempts have been made to address these shortcomings. To estimate the degree of non-compliance in gynaecological practice, we set out to prospectively audit the standard of documentation of operation notes in a busy District General Hospital serving the largest Borough in terms of population in the city of London. An initial prospective audit was carried out in July 2008; and this was re-audited after 12 months using a standardised proforma based on the Royal College of Surgeons of England guidelines. There was evidence of significant improvement with the use of a standardised proforma.

[1]  P J Webb,et al.  Inadequacies of hospital medical records. , 1993, Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England.

[2]  R F Dale,et al.  Use of database management system by surgeons to produce operation notes. , 1996, Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England.

[3]  A O'Bichere,et al.  The quality of operation notes: can simple word processors help? , 1997, Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England.

[4]  E. Basad,et al.  [Importance of computer-based procedures. Planning and documentation in orthopedic surgery]. , 1999, Der Orthopade.

[5]  A. Carney,et al.  An audit of the quality of operation notes in an otolaryngology unit. , 1999, Journal of the Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh.

[6]  D. Deimel,et al.  [Standardized computer-based documentation system for diagnoses and medical performance in orthopedics and traumatology. Development and initial application]. , 1999, Der Orthopade.

[7]  J D M Nicopoullos,et al.  Significant improvement in quality of caesarean section documentation with dedicated operative proforma--completion of the audit cycle , 2003, Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology : the journal of the Institute of Obstetrics and Gynaecology.

[8]  R. Mann,et al.  Standards in medical record keeping. , 2003, Clinical medicine.

[9]  F. Ali,et al.  Improving the standard of operation notes in orthopaedic and trauma surgery: the value of a proforma. , 2004, Injury.

[10]  Liviu P Lefter,et al.  AN AUDIT OF OPERATIVE NOTES: FACTS AND WAYS TO IMPROVE * , 2008, ANZ journal of surgery.

[11]  D. Morgan,et al.  Improving operation notes to meet British Orthopaedic Association guidelines. , 2009, Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England.

[12]  B. Rogers,et al.  Is There Adequate Information on Operation Notes? the Application of the Royal College of Surgeons of England Guidelines , 2010, Journal of perioperative practice.

[13]  A. Barritt,et al.  Improving the quality of procedure-specific operation reports in orthopaedic surgery. , 2010, Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England.

[14]  Neil Borley,et al.  Good surgical practice , 2013 .