A sequential route of data and document qualities, satisfaction and motivations on researchers' data reuse intentions

PurposeThis study examined how the qualities of both data and documents of existing datasets can contribute to researchers' satisfaction of data reuse, and how it affects their data reuse intentions mediated by attitudinal and normative beliefs of data reuse.Design/methodology/approachA combined theoretical framework integrating IS (Information Systems) Success Model and the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) was utilized to develop the research model of researchers' data reuse, which was evaluated using structural equation modeling based on 820 survey responses from STEM disciplines in the US.FindingsThis study found that both data and document qualities significantly contribute to researchers' satisfaction of data reuse. Then, their satisfaction significantly increases perceived usefulness and subjective norm of data reuse, and it decreases perceived risk associated with data reuse. Finally, both perceived usefulness and subjective norm significantly increases their data reuse intentions.Research limitations/implicationsThe combined theoretical framework integrating IS success model and TPB provides a new theoretical lens in understanding researchers' data reuse behaviors affected by the qualities of both data and documents.Practical implicationsThe findings of this study provided several practical implications in promoting and facilitating researchers' data reuse behaviors by improving data and document qualities of existing datasets.Originality/valueThis is one of the initial studies focusing on the roles of data and document qualities in researchers' data reuse, and it provides a systematic view of how data and document qualities influence researchers' data reuse mediated by their satisfaction of data reuse and attitudinal and normative beliefs.

[1]  Renata Gonçalves Curty,et al.  Factors Influencing Research Data Reuse in the Social Sciences: An Exploratory Study , 2016, Int. J. Digit. Curation.

[2]  James C. Anderson,et al.  STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING IN PRACTICE: A REVIEW AND RECOMMENDED TWO-STEP APPROACH , 1988 .

[3]  Ephraim R. McLean,et al.  The DeLone and McLean Model of Information Systems Success: A Ten-Year Update , 2003, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[4]  Bradley M. Hemminger,et al.  Scientific data repositories on the Web: An initial survey , 2010, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[5]  Bradley M. Hemminger,et al.  Scientific data repositories on the Web: An initial survey , 2010 .

[6]  F. Bookstein,et al.  Two Structural Equation Models: LISREL and PLS Applied to Consumer Exit-Voice Theory: , 1982 .

[7]  Youngseek Kim,et al.  Internet researchers' data sharing behaviors: An integration of data reuse experience, attitudinal beliefs, social norms, and resource factors , 2018, Online Inf. Rev..

[8]  Robert P. Guralnick,et al.  OBIS-USA: A Data-Sharing Legacy of the Census of Marine Life , 2011 .

[9]  Christine L. Borgman,et al.  The conundrum of sharing research data , 2012, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[10]  Ayoung Yoon End users’ trust in data repositories: definition and influences on trust development , 2014 .

[11]  Lynne M. Markus,et al.  Toward a Theory of Knowledge Reuse: Types of Knowledge Reuse Situations and Factors in Reuse Success , 2001 .

[12]  Wynne W. Chin The partial least squares approach for structural equation modeling. , 1998 .

[13]  T. Ramayah,et al.  An Empirical Inquiry on Knowledge Sharing Among Academicians in Higher Learning Institutions , 2013 .

[14]  Jared Lyle,et al.  The Enduring Value of Social Science Research: The Use and Reuse of Primary Research Data , 2010, iPRES.

[15]  Key Pousttchi,et al.  Mobile word-of-mouth – A grounded theory of mobile viral marketing , 2009, J. Inf. Technol..

[16]  Ann Zimmerman,et al.  Beyond the Data Deluge: A Research Agenda for Large-Scale Data Sharing and Reuse , 2011, Int. J. Digit. Curation.

[17]  Nancy A. Van House Digital libraries and practices of trust: Networked biodiversity information , 2002 .

[18]  Ming-Chi Lee,et al.  Predicting and explaining the adoption of online trading: An empirical study in Taiwan , 2009, Decis. Support Syst..

[19]  Abdollah Homaifar,et al.  Detecting Environmental Change Using Self-Organizing Map Techniques Applied to the ERA-40 Database , 2011, Data Sci. J..

[20]  Jane M. Howell,et al.  Personal Computing: Toward a Conceptual Model of Utilization , 1991, MIS Q..

[21]  M. Boodhwani,et al.  The internal thoracic artery skeletonization study: A paired, within-patient comparison [NCT00265499] , 2006, Trials.

[22]  Elizabeth D. Dalton,et al.  Changes in Data Sharing and Data Reuse Practices and Perceptions among Scientists Worldwide , 2015, PloS one.

[23]  C. Fornell,et al.  Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error: Algebra and Statistics , 1981 .

[24]  Anol Bhattacherjee,et al.  Understanding Changes in Belief and Attitude Toward Information Technology Usage: A Theoretical Model and Longitudinal Test , 2004, MIS Q..

[25]  Geoffrey C. Bowker,et al.  Promoting Access to Public Research Data for Scientific, Economic, and Social Development , 2004, Data Sci. J..

[26]  Ayoung Yoon,et al.  Data reusers' trust development , 2017, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[27]  M. Appelbaum,et al.  Some issues of conducting secondary analyses , 1991 .

[28]  T. Kostova,et al.  Adoption of an Organizational Practice by Subsidiaries of Multinational Corporations: Institutional and Relational Effects , 2002 .

[29]  Elizabeth Yakel,et al.  Social scientists' satisfaction with data reuse , 2016, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[30]  Rodney M. Forster,et al.  Does operational oceanography address the needs of fisheries and applied environmental scientists , 2011 .

[31]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  Toward A Theory of Knowledge Reuse : Types of Knowledge Reuse Situations and Factors in Reuse Success , 2022 .

[32]  F. Bookstein,et al.  Two Structural Equation Models: LISREL and PLS Applied to Consumer Exit-Voice Theory , 1982 .

[33]  Thomas Hess,et al.  Opportunities and risks of software-as-a-service: Findings from a survey of IT executives , 2011, Decis. Support Syst..

[34]  Melissa H. Cragin,et al.  Scientific Data Collections and Distributed Collective Practice , 2006, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[35]  Fred D. Davis Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[36]  Asli Yagmur Akbulut-Bailey Information Sharing between Local and State Governments , 2011, J. Comput. Inf. Syst..

[37]  Ann Zimmerman,et al.  Not by metadata alone: the use of diverse forms of knowledge to locate data for reuse , 2007, International Journal on Digital Libraries.

[38]  Ben Anderson,et al.  What Are Data? The Many Kinds of Data and Their Implications for Data Re-Use , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[39]  Paul F. Uhlir Information Gulags, Intellectual Straightjackets, and Memory Holes , 2010, Data Sci. J..

[40]  D. Littler,et al.  Consumer perceptions of risk and uncertainty and the implications for behaviour towards innovative retail services: The case of Internet Banking , 2006 .

[41]  Jen-Her Wu,et al.  What drives mobile commerce?: An empirical evaluation of the revised technology acceptance model , 2005, Inf. Manag..

[42]  N. House Digital libraries and practices of trust: Networked biodiversity information , 2002 .

[43]  A. Vickers Whose data set is it anyway? Sharing raw data from randomized trials , 2006, Trials.

[44]  Theodor D. Sterling,et al.  Sharing scientific data , 1990, CACM.

[45]  Kwok Kee Wei,et al.  What drives continued knowledge sharing? An investigation of knowledge-contribution and -seeking beliefs , 2009, Decis. Support Syst..

[46]  Nancy A. Van House,et al.  Cooperative knowledge work and practices of trust: sharing environmental planning data sets , 1998, CSCW '98.

[47]  M StantonJeffrey,et al.  Institutional and individual factors affecting scientists' data-sharing behaviors , 2016 .

[48]  Nithya Ramanathan,et al.  Know Thy Sensor: Trust, Data Quality, and Data Integrity in Scientific Digital Libraries , 2007, ECDL.

[49]  Kar Yan Tam,et al.  Understanding Continued Information Technology Usage Behavior: A Comparison of Three Models in the Context of Mobile Internet , 2006, Decis. Support Syst..

[50]  Elizabeth Yakel,et al.  Context from the data reuser's point of view , 2019, J. Documentation.

[51]  Elizabeth Yakel,et al.  The challenges of digging data: a study of context in archaeological data reuse , 2013, JCDL '13.

[52]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models , 1989 .

[53]  Zahra Tohidinia,et al.  Knowledge sharing behaviour and its predictors , 2010, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[54]  Ephraim R. McLean,et al.  Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable , 1992, Inf. Syst. Res..

[55]  Alia I. Abdelmoty,et al.  Semantics, ontologies and eScience for the geosciences , 2009, Comput. Geosci..

[56]  Youngseek Kim,et al.  Institutional and individual factors affecting scientists' data‐sharing behaviors: A multilevel analysis , 2016, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[57]  Icek Ajzen,et al.  From Intentions to Actions: A Theory of Planned Behavior , 1985 .

[58]  I. Ajzen The theory of planned behavior , 1991 .

[59]  Jeremy P. Birnholtz,et al.  Data at work: supporting sharing in science and engineering , 2003, GROUP.

[60]  Christine L Borgman,et al.  Science friction: Data, metadata, and collaboration , 2011, Social studies of science.

[61]  Craig W. Trumbo,et al.  Intention to Conserve Water: Environmental Values, Reasoned Action, and Information Effects Across Time , 2005 .

[62]  Ixchel M. Faniel,et al.  Reusing Scientific Data: How Earthquake Engineering Researchers Assess the Reusability of Colleagues’ Data , 2010, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[63]  Wolfgang Zenk-Möltgen,et al.  Factors influencing the data sharing behavior of researchers in sociology and political science , 2018, J. Documentation.

[64]  Jorge Tiago Martins,et al.  Research data sharing behaviour of engineering researchers in Norway and the UK: uncovering the double face of Janus , 2020, J. Documentation.

[65]  Ann Zimmerman,et al.  New Knowledge from Old Data , 2008 .

[66]  Li Jiang,et al.  Trust and Electronic Government Success: An Empirical Study , 2008, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[67]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Organizational Buyers' Adoption and Use of B2B Electronic Marketplaces: Efficiency- and Legitimacy-Oriented Perspectives , 2007, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[68]  Elizabeth Yakel,et al.  Managing fixity and fluidity in data repositories , 2012, iConference '12.

[69]  Robert W. Zmud,et al.  Behavioral Intention Formation in Knowledge Sharing: Examining the Roles of Extrinsic Motivators, Social-Psychological Factors, and Organizational Climate , 2005, MIS Q..

[70]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation , 1991, Inf. Syst. Res..

[71]  Suzie Allard,et al.  Data sharing, management, use, and reuse: Practices and perceptions of scientists worldwide , 2020, PloS one.

[72]  Paul A. Pavlou,et al.  Predicting E-Services Adoption: A Perceived Risk Facets Perspective , 2002, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[73]  David F. Larcker,et al.  Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error: Algebra and Statistics: , 1981 .

[74]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View , 2003, MIS Q..