Influence of slope angle on pore pressure generation and kinematics of pyroclastic flows: insights from laboratory experiments

The influence of slope angle on pore pressure generation and kinematics of fines-rich pyroclastic flows was investigated through laboratory experiments. Granular flows were generated by the release of a column of fine glass beads (d = 0.08 mm) in an inclined channel (0–30°). The granular column could be fluidized while the channel base was either smooth or made rough by glued beads of 3 mm diameter. Pore pressure measurements reveal that the degree of autofluidization, caused by air escaping from the substrate interstices into which flow particles settled, was high at all slope angles. Flow runout increase due to autofluidization, however, was reduced at slope angle higher than ∼12° because of the occurrence of a strong deceleration phase that limited the flow duration. This is probably caused by the combination of flow head thinning at increased slope angle and settling of particles into the substrate interstices until the flow ran out of mass. Analysis of high-speed videos suggests that ingestion of ambient air at the flow front did not occur, even on steep slopes of 30°. Experiments at inclinations close to (25°) or slightly higher (30°) than the repose angle of the granular material (28.5°) revealed the formation of a thin basal deposit that was then eroded as the flow thickness and velocity gradually decreased. Our study suggests that air escape from substrate interstices in nature can be a significant external cause of pore pressure generation that favors low energy dissipation and long runout distances of pyroclastic flows on moderate topographies.

[1]  Riccardo Artoni,et al.  Effective boundary conditions for dense granular flows. , 2009, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[2]  Anne Mangeney,et al.  On the run-out distance of geophysical gravitational flows: Insight from fluidized granular collapse experiments , 2011 .

[3]  P. Lettieri,et al.  Gas retention in fine-grained pyroclastic flow materials at high temperatures , 2007 .

[4]  R. Sparks,et al.  Erosion by pyroclastic flows on Lascar Volcano, Chile , 1997 .

[5]  G. Lube,et al.  Flow and deposition of pyroclastic granular flows: A type example from the 1975 Ngauruhoe eruption, New Zealand , 2007 .

[6]  Peter Kokelaar,et al.  Pyroclastic density currents and the sedimentation of ignimbrites , 2002 .

[7]  B. Andrews.  Dispersal and air entrainment in unconfined dilute pyroclastic density currents , 2014, Bulletin of Volcanology.

[8]  R. Sparks,et al.  Erosion, transport and segregation of pumice and lithic clasts in pyroclastic flows inferred from ignimbrite at Lascar Volcano, Chile , 2000 .

[9]  J. R. Allen.  Relationship of flute-cast morphology to internal sedimentary structures in turbidites; a discussion , 1971 .

[10]  R. S. J. Sparks,et al.  The influence of particle size on the flow of initially fluidised powders , 2006 .

[11]  Martin Rhodes,et al.  Introduction to Particle Technology , 1998 .

[12]  Richard J. Brown,et al.  Internal flow variations and diachronous sedimentation within extensive, sustained, density-stratified pyroclastic density currents flowing down gentle slopes, as revealed by the internal architectures of ignimbrites on Tenerife , 2013, Bulletin of Volcanology.

[13]  H. Huppert,et al.  Granular column collapses down rough, inclined channels , 2011, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[14]  J. Ampuero,et al.  Frictional velocity-weakening in landslides on Earth and on other planetary bodies , 2014, Nature Communications.

[15]  G. Valentine,et al.  Basal layered deposits of the Peach Springs Tuff, northwestern Arizona, USA , 1989 .

[16]  A. Woods,et al.  The interaction of ash flows with ridges , 1998 .

[17]  G. Heiken,et al.  Mobility of a large-volume pyroclastic flow — emplacement of the Campanian ignimbrite, Italy , 1993 .

[18]  Richard J. Brown,et al.  Bypassing and diachronous deposition from density currents: Evidence from a giant regressive bed form in the Poris ignimbrite, Tenerife, Canary Islands , 2004 .

[19]  T. Druitt,et al.  Propagation and hindered settling of laboratory ash flows - art. no. B02202 , 2008 .

[20]  L. Lirer,et al.  Self-fluidization of subaerial rapid granular flows , 2008 .

[21]  J. Simpson.  Mixing at the front of a gravity current , 1986 .

[22]  G. Valentine,et al.  Dynamic pore-pressure variations induce substrate erosion by pyroclastic flows , 2013 .

[23]  B. Brand,et al.  Dynamics of Pyroclastic Density Currents: Conditions That Promote Substrate Erosion and Self-Channelization - Mount St Helens, Washington (USA) , 2014 .

[24]  J. Simpson,et al.  Effects of the lower boundary on the head of a gravity current , 1972, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[25]  K. Mctaggart.  The mobility of nuees ardentes , 1960 .

[26]  Anne Mangeney,et al.  Mobility and topographic effects for large Valles Marineris landslides on Mars , 2007 .

[27]  J. R. Allen.  Mixing at Turbidity Current Heads, and Its Geological Implications , 1971 .

[28]  O. Roche.  Depositional processes and gas pore pressure in pyroclastic flows: an experimental perspective , 2012, Bulletin of Volcanology.

[29]  J. Tison,et al.  Modelling brine and nutrient dynamics in Antarctic sea ice: the case of dissolved silica , 2009 .

[30]  R. Sparks,et al.  Grain size variations in ignimbrites and implications for the transport of pyroclastic flows , 1976 .

[31]  T. Barry,et al.  Temporal and spatial evolution of a waxing then waning catastrophic density current revealed by chemical mapping , 2014 .

[32]  O. Roche,et al.  Autofluidization of pyroclastic flows propagating on rough substrates as shown by laboratory experiments , 2014 .

[33]  N. Mangold,et al.  Erosion and mobility in granular collapse over sloping beds , 2010 .

[34]  G. Midi,et al.  On dense granular flows , 2003, The European physical journal. E, Soft matter.

[35]  T. Druitt.  Pyroclastic density currents , 1998, Geological Society, London, Special Publications.

[36]  G. Giordano.  The effect of paleotopography on lithic distribution and facies associations of small volume ignimbrites: the WTT Cupa (Roccamonfina volcano, Italy) , 1998 .

[37]  B. Houghton,et al.  An exceptionally widespread ignimbrite with implications for pyroclastic flow emplacement , 1995, Nature.

[38]  A. Mangeney,et al.  Fundamental changes of granular flow dynamics, deposition, and erosion processes at high slope angles: Insights from laboratory experiments , 2014 .

[39]  R. Cas,et al.  Experimental study of dense pyroclastic density currents using sustained, gas-fluidized granular flows , 2014, Bulletin of Volcanology.

[40]  A. Tamburrino,et al.  Pore fluid pressure diffusion in defluidizing granular columns , 2012 .

[41]  Jean-Pierre Vilotte,et al.  Numerical modeling of self‐channeling granular flows and of their levee‐channel deposits , 2006 .

[42]  R. Iverson,et al.  U. S. Geological Survey , 1967, Radiocarbon.

[43]  C. Wilson.  The role of fluidization in the emplacement of pyroclastic claws: An experimental approach , 1980 .

[44]  K. Hamilton.  Gravity Currents in the Environment and the Laboratory , 1998 .

[45]  K. Kelfoun,et al.  Pyroclastic flow erosion and bulking processes: comparing field-based vs. modeling results at Tungurahua volcano, Ecuador , 2014, Bulletin of Volcanology.

[46]  A. Tamburrino,et al.  Pore fluid pressure and internal kinematics of gravitational laboratory air‐particle flows: Insights into the emplacement dynamics of pyroclastic flows , 2010 .

[47]  M. Manga,et al.  Experimental study of turbulence, sedimentation, and coignimbrite mass partitioning in dilute pyroclastic density currents , 2012 .