Comparison of environmental degradation in Hanwha 295 W and SunPower 320 W photovoltaic modules via accelerated lifecycle testing

Lifecycle testing of full-scale photovoltaic (PV) modules was conducted in a large-sized, accelerated-degradation chamber in our labs that enables full-solar-spectrum irradiance, temperature, and humidity control. In-situ measurement of both polycrystalline and monocrystalline silicon PV module energy conversion characteristics were examined under environmental lifecycle conditions representative of Tucson, AZ. Specifically, the performance degradation of a Hanwha 295 W polycrystalline PV module and of a SunPower 320 W monocrystalline PV module were evaluated and compared. Results indicate that the initial efficiency of the polycrystalline module and the subsequent annual degradation occurred within expected ranges for that system. In contrast, the single-crystal module exhibited both a significant decrease in PV module efficiency during the test cycle, and early evidence of environmentally-induced materials degradation across the module. The temperature and time-dependence of PV module behavior were extracted to provide insight into early-stage performance degradation under conditions approximating field-relevant environments.

[1]  Adria E. Brooks,et al.  Field performance measurements of new and traditional PV technologies , 2012 .

[2]  Dirk C. Jordan,et al.  Measuring degradation rates of PV systems without irradiance data , 2014 .

[3]  J. Miller,et al.  Long Term Reliability of Photovoltaic Modules , 2006, 2006 IEEE 4th World Conference on Photovoltaic Energy Conference.

[4]  K. Koch,et al.  Analysis of 80 rooftop PV systems in the Tucson, AZ area , 2012, 2012 38th IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference.

[5]  Olivier Haillant,et al.  Accelerated weathering testing principles to estimate the service life of organic PV modules , 2011 .

[6]  P. Rappaport,et al.  Effect of Temperature on Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conversion , 1960 .

[7]  J. Coello.  Degradation of Crystalline Silicon Modules: A Case Study on 785 Samples After Two Years under Operation , 2011 .

[8]  T. J. McMahon,et al.  History of accelerated and qualification testing of terrestrial photovoltaic modules: A literature review , 2009 .

[9]  G. Makrides,et al.  Degradation of different photovoltaic technologies under field conditions , 2010, 2010 35th IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference.

[10]  T. J. McMahon.  Accelerated testing and failure of thin‐film PV modules , 2004 .

[11]  E. Dunlop.  Lifetime performance of crystalline silicon PV modules , 2003, 3rd World Conference onPhotovoltaic Energy Conversion, 2003. Proceedings of.

[12]  D. L. King,et al.  Commonly observed degradation in field-aged photovoltaic modules , 2002, Conference Record of the Twenty-Ninth IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference, 2002..

[13]  Martha Christina Lux-Steiner,et al.  ZnO layers deposited by the ion layer gas reaction on Cu(In,Ga)(S,Se)2 thin film solar cell absorbers—impact of ‘damp‐heat’ conditions on the layer properties , 2007 .

[14]  Dirk C. Jordan,et al.  Photovoltaic Degradation Rates—an Analytical Review , 2012 .

[15]  D. L. King,et al.  Photovoltaic module performance and durability following long‐term field exposure , 2000 .

[16]  Laura S. Bruckman,et al.  Photodegradation in a stress and response framework: poly(methyl methacrylate) for solar mirrors and lens , 2012 .

[17]  E. Skoplaki,et al.  ON THE TEMPERATURE DEPENDENCE OF PHOTOVOLTAIC MODULE ELECTRICAL PERFORMANCE: A REVIEW OF EFFICIENCY/ POWER CORRELATIONS , 2009 .

[18]  K. Otani,et al.  Long‐term performance degradation of various kinds of photovoltaic modules under moderate climatic conditions , 2011 .

[19]  Adria Brooks,et al.  Performance reviews from the Tucson Electric Power solar test yard , 2011, 2011 37th IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference.