Long-term patient acceptance of and satisfaction with implanted device remote monitoring.

AIMS To evaluate patients' acceptance and satisfaction of the Home Monitoring (HM) remote control system after 1 year of follow-up by a self-made questionnaire (HM Acceptance and Satisfaction Questionnaire, HoMASQ) specifically designed for this purpose. METHODS AND RESULTS The HoMASQ contains 12 items designed to investigate five different aspects strictly connected to patient's acceptance and satisfaction of remote monitoring: (i) relationship with their healthcare provider, (ii) easy of use of HM technology, (iii) related psychological aspects, (iv) implications on general health, and (v) overall satisfaction. Each item was rated on a five-point scale: from 0 to 4 with favourable responses score > or =2. The theoretical maximum total score (the highest detected acceptance and satisfaction level) was 48. The HoMASQ was given to 119 patients followed by HM during the 1-year follow-up visit. Ninety-nine percent of all the administered questionnaire items were answered. The mean total score was 40.8 +/- 5.4 with a mean percentage of favourable answers of 96.3 +/- 18.8% (CI 95.2 - 97.2%). The mean scores for each of the five areas of the HoMASQ were: 3.0 +/- 0.9 for relationship, 3.4 +/- 0.6 for easy of use, 3.4 +/- 0.9 for psychological aspects, and 3.4 +/- 0.8 for clinical implication and overall satisfaction. Cronbach's alpha for reliability of the HoMASQ was 0.73. CONCLUSION A high level of acceptance and satisfaction after 1-year remote control by HM was detected by the five-point scale HoMASQ, which showed a good internal reliability.

[1]  Tiziano Toselli,et al.  Documento di consenso sul monitoraggio remoto dei dispositivi impiantabili: tecnologie disponibili, indicazioni, modelli organizzativi, accettabilità, responsabilità ed aspetti economici Associazione Italiana di Aritmologia e Cardiostimolazione Area di Telecardiologia , 2011 .

[2]  A. Lazarus.  Remote, Wireless, Ambulatory Monitoring of Implantable Pacemakers, Cardioverter Defibrillators, and Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Systems: Analysis of a Worldwide Database , 2007, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[3]  J. Burkhardt,et al.  Remote Interrogation and Monitoring of Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators , 2004, Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology.

[4]  Cristina Masella,et al.  Remote Monitoring of CRT‐ICD: The Multicenter Italian CareLink Evaluation—Ease of Use, Acceptance, and Organizational Implications , 2008, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[5]  J. E. Brazier,et al.  Validating the SF-36 health survey questionnaire: new outcome measure for primary care. , 1992, BMJ.

[6]  Renato Pietro Ricci,et al.  Remote control of implanted devices through Home Monitoring technology improves detection and clinical management of atrial fibrillation. , 2008, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[7]  N. Varma.  Therapeutic implications of automatic home monitoring of implantable cardiac devices , 2009, Current treatment options in cardiovascular medicine.

[8]  S. Priori,et al.  HRS/EHRA expert consensus on the monitoring of cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIEDs): description of techniques, indications, personnel, frequency and ethical considerations. , 2008, Heart rhythm.

[9]  P. Whitten,et al.  Systematic review of studies of patient satisfaction with telemedicine , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[10]  L. Cronbach.  Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests , 1951 .

[11]  D. Weiss,et al.  Remote Monitoring of Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators: , 2004, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[12]  Silvia G Priori,et al.  HRS/EHRA Expert Consensus on the Monitoring of Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Devices (CIEDs): description of techniques, indications, personnel, frequency and ethical considerations: developed in partnership with the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS) and the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) , 2008, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[13]  M. Santini,et al.  Home monitoring remote control of pacemaker and implantable cardioverter defibrillator patients in clinical practice: impact on medical management and health-care resource utilization. , 2008, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[14]  E. Aliot,et al.  Automatic home monitoring of implantable cardioverter defibrillators. , 2008, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[15]  D. Grobbee,et al.  Psychometric properties of Aquarel. a disease-specific quality of life questionnaire for pacemaker patients. , 2001, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[16]  P. Whitten,et al.  Patient and provider satisfaction with the use of telemedicine: overview and rationale for cautious enthusiasm. , 2005, Journal of postgraduate medicine.

[17]  J. Clémenty,et al.  Optimized post-operative surveillance of permanent pacemakers by home monitoring: the OEDIPE trial , 2008, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.