Rapid Screening for CRISPR-Directed Editing of the Drosophila Genome Using white Coconversion

Adoption of a streamlined version of the bacterial clustered regular interspersed short palindromic repeat (CRISPR)/Cas9 defense system has accelerated targeted genome engineering. The Streptococcus pyogenes Cas9 protein, directed by a simplified, CRISPR-like single-guide RNA, catalyzes a double-stranded DNA break at a specific genomic site; subsequent repair by end joining can introduce mutagenic insertions or deletions, while repair by homologous recombination using an exogenous DNA template can incorporate new sequences at the target locus. However, the efficiency of Cas9-directed mutagenesis is low in Drosophila melanogaster. Here, we describe a strategy that reduces the time and effort required to identify flies with targeted genomic changes. The strategy uses editing of the white gene, evidenced by altered eye color, to predict successful editing of an unrelated gene-of-interest. The red eyes of wild-type flies are readily distinguished from white-eyed (end-joining-mediated loss of White function) or brown-eyed (recombination-mediated conversion to the whitecoffee allele) mutant flies. When single injected G0 flies produce individual G1 broods, flies carrying edits at a gene-of-interest were readily found in broods in which all G1 offspring carried white mutations. Thus, visual assessment of eye color substitutes for wholesale PCR screening of large numbers of G1 offspring. We find that end-joining-mediated mutations often show signatures of microhomology-mediated repair and that recombination-based mutations frequently involve donor plasmid integration at the target locus. Finally, we show that gap repair induced by two guide RNAs more reliably converts the intervening target sequence, whereas the use of Lig4169 mutants to suppress end joining does not improve recombination efficacy.

[1]  S. Ramalingam,et al.  Programmable Site‐Specific Nucleases for Targeted Genome Engineering in Higher Eukaryotes , 2016, Journal of cellular physiology.

[2]  L. Symington,et al.  Microhomology-Mediated End Joining: A Back-up Survival Mechanism or Dedicated Pathway? , 2015, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[3]  S. van den Heuvel,et al.  Polymerase Θ is a key driver of genome evolution and of CRISPR/Cas9-mediated mutagenesis , 2015, Nature Communications.

[4]  J. Doudna,et al.  Expanding the Biologist's Toolkit with CRISPR-Cas9. , 2015, Molecular cell.

[5]  S. Bullock,et al.  Systematic Evaluation of Drosophila CRISPR Tools Reveals Safe and Robust Alternatives to Autonomous Gene Drives in Basic Research , 2015, G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics.

[6]  W. Wurst,et al.  Increasing the efficiency of homology-directed repair for CRISPR-Cas9-induced precise gene editing in mammalian cells , 2015, Nature Biotechnology.

[7]  A. Aryan,et al.  Silencing of end-joining repair for efficient site-specific gene insertion after TALEN/CRISPR mutagenesis in Aedes aegypti , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[8]  Hidde L Ploegh,et al.  Inhibition of non-homologous end joining increases the efficiency of CRISPR/Cas9-mediated precise [TM: inserted] genome editing , 2015, Nature Biotechnology.

[9]  B. Meyer,et al.  Dramatic Enhancement of Genome Editing by CRISPR/Cas9 Through Improved Guide RNA Design , 2015, Genetics.

[10]  N. Pollet,et al.  Comparison of T7E1 and Surveyor Mismatch Cleavage Assays to Detect Mutations Triggered by Engineered Nucleases , 2015, G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics.

[11]  Tzumin Lee,et al.  An Enhanced Gene Targeting Toolkit for Drosophila: Golic+ , 2015, Genetics.

[12]  E. Lander,et al.  Development and Applications of CRISPR-Cas 9 for Genome Engineering , 2015 .

[13]  J. Ward,et al.  Rapid and Precise Engineering of the Caenorhabditis elegans Genome with Lethal Mutation Co-Conversion and Inactivation of NHEJ Repair , 2014, Genetics.

[14]  Yanhui Hu,et al.  Enhanced specificity and efficiency of the CRISPR/Cas9 system with optimized sgRNA parameters in Drosophila. , 2014, Cell reports.

[15]  Grzegorz Sienski,et al.  Efficient CRISPR/Cas9 Plasmids for Rapid and Versatile Genome Editing in Drosophila , 2014, G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics.

[16]  Joshua A. Arribere,et al.  Efficient Marker-Free Recovery of Custom Genetic Modifications with CRISPR/Cas9 in Caenorhabditis elegans , 2014, Genetics.

[17]  F. Schnorrer,et al.  A simple TALEN-based protocol for efficient genome-editing in Drosophila. , 2014, Methods.

[18]  Lu-ping Liu,et al.  Performance of the Cas9 Nickase System in Drosophila melanogaster , 2014, G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics.

[19]  F. Schnorrer,et al.  A Versatile Two-Step CRISPR- and RMCE-Based Strategy for Efficient Genome Engineering in Drosophila , 2014, G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics.

[20]  Simon L. Bullock,et al.  Optimized CRISPR/Cas tools for efficient germline and somatic genome engineering in Drosophila , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[21]  E. Lander,et al.  Development and Applications of CRISPR-Cas9 for Genome Engineering , 2014, Cell.

[22]  C. Mello,et al.  A Co-CRISPR Strategy for Efficient Genome Editing in Caenorhabditis elegans , 2014, Genetics.

[23]  U. Gaul,et al.  Efficient chromosomal gene modification with CRISPR/cas9 and PCR-based homologous recombination donors in cultured Drosophila cells , 2014, Nucleic acids research.

[24]  Jeffry D. Sander,et al.  CRISPR-Cas systems for editing, regulating and targeting genomes , 2014, Nature Biotechnology.

[25]  R. Jiao,et al.  Various applications of TALEN- and CRISPR/Cas9-mediated homologous recombination to modify the Drosophila genome , 2014, Biology Open.

[26]  C. Rubinstein,et al.  Highly Specific and Efficient CRISPR/Cas9-Catalyzed Homology-Directed Repair in Drosophila , 2014, Genetics.

[27]  C. Alexandre,et al.  Accelerated homologous recombination and subsequent genome modification in Drosophila , 2013, Development.

[28]  Shu Kondo,et al.  Highly Improved Gene Targeting by Germline-Specific Cas9 Expression in Drosophila , 2013, Genetics.

[29]  Eli J. Fine,et al.  DNA targeting specificity of RNA-guided Cas9 nucleases , 2013, Nature Biotechnology.

[30]  D. Carroll,et al.  Donor DNA Utilization During Gene Targeting with Zinc-Finger Nucleases , 2013, G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics.

[31]  Luke A. Gilbert,et al.  Repurposing CRISPR as an RNA-Guided Platform for Sequence-Specific Control of Gene Expression , 2013, Cell.

[32]  J. Doudna,et al.  A Programmable Dual-RNA–Guided DNA Endonuclease in Adaptive Bacterial Immunity , 2012, Science.

[33]  Sung Gyun Kang,et al.  One-Step Sequence- and Ligation-Independent Cloning as a Rapid and Versatile Cloning Method for Functional Genomics Studies , 2012, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[34]  Erin L. Doyle,et al.  Targeting DNA Double-Strand Breaks with TAL Effector Nucleases , 2010, Genetics.

[35]  M. McVey,et al.  Dual Roles for DNA Polymerase Theta in Alternative End-Joining Repair of Double-Strand Breaks in Drosophila , 2010, PLoS genetics.

[36]  M. McVey,et al.  Synthesis-dependent microhomology-mediated end joining accounts for multiple types of repair junctions , 2010, Nucleic acids research.

[37]  Jens Boch,et al.  Breaking the Code of DNA Binding Specificity of TAL-Type III Effectors , 2009, Science.

[38]  Matthew J. Moscou,et al.  A Simple Cipher Governs DNA Recognition by TAL Effectors , 2009, Science.

[39]  D. Carroll,et al.  Genetic Analysis of Zinc-Finger Nuclease-Induced Gene Targeting in Drosophila , 2009, Genetics.

[40]  J. Gall,et al.  Efficient gene targeting in Drosophila by direct embryo injection with zinc-finger nucleases , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[41]  M. McVey,et al.  End-Joining Repair of Double-Strand Breaks in Drosophila melanogaster Is Largely DNA Ligase IV Independent , 2004, Genetics.

[42]  M. Adams,et al.  Evidence for Multiple Cycles of Strand Invasion During Repair of Double-Strand Gaps in Drosophila , 2004, Genetics.

[43]  Dana Carroll,et al.  Stimulation of Homologous Recombination through Targeted Cleavage by Chimeric Nucleases , 2001, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[44]  Y. Rong,et al.  Gene targeting by homologous recombination in Drosophila. , 2000, Science.

[45]  G. Cox,et al.  Mutations in the white gene of Drosophila melanogaster affecting ABC transporters that determine eye colouration. , 1999, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[46]  S Chandrasegaran,et al.  A detailed study of the substrate specificity of a chimeric restriction enzyme. , 1999, Nucleic acids research.

[47]  S Chandrasegaran,et al.  Hybrid restriction enzymes: zinc finger fusions to Fok I cleavage domain. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[48]  G. Gloor,et al.  Type I repressors of P element mobility. , 1993, Genetics.

[49]  P. Bingham,et al.  Regulation of white locus expression: The structure of mutant alleles at the white locus of Drosophila melanogaster , 1982, Cell.