Evaluation of a novel, ultrathin, tip-bending endoscope in a synthetic force-sensing pancreas with comparison to medical guide wires

Purpose: Direct visualization of pancreatic ductal tissue is critical for early diagnosis of pancreatic diseases and for guiding therapeutic interventions. A novel, ultrathin (5 Fr) scanning fiber endoscope (SFE) with tip-bending capability has been developed specifically to achieve high resolution imaging as a pancreatoscope during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). This device has potential to dramatically improve both diagnostic and therapeutic capabilities during ERCP by providing direct video feedback and tool guidance to clinicians. Methods: Invasiveness of the new tip-bending SFE was evaluated by a performance comparison to ERCP guide wires, which are routinely inserted into the pancreatic duct during ERCP. An in vitro test model with four force sensors embedded in a synthetic pancreas was designed to detect and compare the insertion forces for 0.89 mm and 0.53 mm diameter guide wires as well as the 1.7 mm diameter SFE. Insertions were performed through the working channel of a therapeutic duodenoscope for the two types of guide wires and using a statistically similar direct insertion method for comparison to the SFE. Results: Analysis of the forces detected by the sensors showed the smaller diameter 0.53 mm wire produced significantly less average and maximum forces during insertion than the larger diameter 0.89 mm wire. With the use of tip-bending and optical visualization, the 1.7 mm diameter SFE produced significantly less average force during insertion than the 0.89 mm wire at every sensor, despite its larger size. It was further shown that the use of tip-bending with the SFE significantly reduced the forces at all sensors, compared to insertions when tip-bending was not used. Conclusion: Combining high quality video imaging with two-axis tip-bending allows a larger diameter guide wire-style device to be inserted into the pancreatic duct during ERCP with improved capacity to perform diagnostics and therapy.

[1]  D. Sahani,et al.  Cytology Adds Value to Imaging Studies for Risk Assessment of Malignancy in Pancreatic Mucinous Cysts , 2011, Annals of surgery.

[2]  J. Tokar,et al.  Current status of advanced gastrointestinal endoscopy training fellowships in the United States , 2011, Advances in medical education and practice.

[3]  Timothy D. Soper,et al.  Scanning fiber endoscopy with highly flexible, 1 mm catheterscopes for wide‐field, full‐color imaging , 2010, Journal of biophotonics.

[4]  Eric J. Seibel,et al.  Wide field fluorescence imaging in narrow passageways using scanning fiber endoscope technology , 2010, BiOS.

[5]  Yili Fu,et al.  Steerable catheters in minimally invasive vascular surgery , 2009, The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS.

[6]  E. Seibel,et al.  New endoscopic and cytologic tools for cancer surveillance in the digestive tract. , 2009, Gastrointestinal endoscopy clinics of North America.

[7]  M. Canto Screening and surveillance approaches in familial pancreatic cancer. , 2008, Gastrointestinal endoscopy clinics of North America.

[8]  M. Kimmey,et al.  Scanning single fiber endoscopy: a new platform technology for integrated laser imaging, diagnosis, and future therapies. , 2008, Gastrointestinal endoscopy clinics of North America.

[9]  M. Bourke,et al.  A prospective randomized trial of cannulation technique in ERCP: effects on technical success and post-ERCP pancreatitis , 2008, Endoscopy.

[10]  Eric J. Seibel,et al.  1-mm catheterscope , 2008, SPIE BiOS.

[11]  G. Lehman,et al.  Pancreatitis after endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography. , 2007, World journal of gastroenterology.

[12]  D. Pleskow,et al.  SpyGlass single-operator peroral cholangiopancreatoscopy system for the diagnosis and therapy of bile-duct disorders: a clinical feasibility study (with video). , 2007, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[13]  P. Russ,et al.  Pancreatic imaging: current and emerging technologies. , 2006, Pancreas.

[14]  G. McLennan,et al.  Workshop on imaging science development for cancer prevention and preemption. , 2006, Cancer biomarkers : section A of Disease markers.

[15]  R S Rowland,et al.  Recording forces exerted on the bowel wall during colonoscopy: in vitro evaluation , 2005, The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS.

[16]  D. Loft,et al.  Radiation exposure to personnel performing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography , 2005, Postgraduate Medical Journal.

[17]  H. Yamagishi,et al.  Initial experience with a new peroral electronic pancreatoscope with an accessory channel. , 2004, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[18]  H. Yamagishi,et al.  Electronic pancreatoscopy for the diagnosis of pancreatic diseases , 2002, American Journal of Gastroenterology.

[19]  A. Sauvanet,et al.  Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Tumors of the Pancreas Confined to Secondary Ducts Show Less Aggressive Pathologic Features as Compared With Those Involving the Main Pancreatic Duct , 2000, The American journal of surgical pathology.

[20]  A. Hadidi Pancreatic duct diameter: Sonographic measurement in normal subjects , 1983, Journal of clinical ultrasound : JCU.

[21]  L. Tanoue Cancer Statistics, 2009 , 2010 .

[22]  J. Geenen,et al.  ERCP guide wires. , 1996, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[23]  N. Dubrawsky Cancer statistics , 1989, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.