Age-Related Differences in Visual Search Task Performance: Relative Stability of Parallel but not Serial Search

The hypothesis that visual search tasks requiring effortful, serial processing are more sensitive to aging than those requiring relatively automatic, parallel processing was tested in 96 healthy adults who performed parallel and serial visual search tasks with fixed presentation times. Reaction times and error rates increased with age in both tasks, but there was no difference between young and old in the effect of increasing numbers of distractors on reaction times. However, the older subjects made significantly more errors with increasing numbers of distractors in the serial search task. Older subjects have disproportionately more difficulty performing serial compared to parallel visual search tasks than do younger subjects. Additionally, this difference is not caused solely by cautious response strategies in the elders.

[1]  A Treisman,et al.  Feature analysis in early vision: evidence from search asymmetries. , 1988, Psychological review.

[2]  Jordan Grafman,et al.  Handbook of Neuropsychology , 1991 .

[3]  T. Heeren,et al.  Reference Values for the Mini‐Mental , 1990, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[4]  D. Madden,et al.  Adult age differences in the rate of information extraction during visual search. , 1991, Journal of gerontology.

[5]  James R. Bergen,et al.  Parallel versus serial processing in rapid pattern discrimination , 1983, Nature.

[6]  G. Moraglia.  Visual Search: Spatial Frequency and Orientation , 1989, Perceptual and motor skills.

[7]  D. Plude,et al.  Aging, selective attention, and feature integration. , 1989, Psychology and aging.

[8]  Charles W. Eriksen,et al.  Temporal factors in visual perception as related to aging , 1970 .

[9]  W. Hoyer,et al.  Age and the selectivity of visual information processing. , 1986, Psychology and aging.

[10]  H. Pashler,et al.  Detecting conjunctions of color and form: Reassessing the serial search hypothesis , 1987, Perception & psychophysics.

[11]  F. Plum.  Handbook of Physiology. , 1960 .

[12]  A. Welford,et al.  Reaction Time, Speed of Performance, and Age , 1988, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[13]  F. Craik,et al.  Effects of aging and task difficulty on divided attention performance. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[14]  C D Wickens,et al.  Age differences in the speed and capacity of information processing: 1. A dual-task approach. , 1987, Psychology and aging.

[15]  J Agnew,et al.  Age‐specific norms for the Mini‐Mental State Exam , 1988, Neurology.

[16]  S. Folstein,et al.  "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. , 1975, Journal of psychiatric research.

[17]  Anne Treisman,et al.  Features and objects in visual processing , 1986 .

[18]  G. Alexopoulos,et al.  Use of the Cornell Scale in Nondemented Patients , 1988, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[19]  G. Niederehe.  Psychiatric Symptoms and Cognitive Loss in the Elderly , 1981 .

[20]  J. Birren,et al.  Handbook of the psychology of aging, 3rd ed. , 1985 .

[21]  M. Folstein,et al.  Clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease , 1984, Neurology.

[22]  J. Langston,et al.  The Neurobehavioral Cognitive Status Examination: a brief but quantitative approach to cognitive assessment. , 1987, Annals of internal medicine.

[23]  T. L. Brink,et al.  Screening tests for geriatric depression , 1982 .

[24]  A. Treisman,et al.  Search asymmetry: a diagnostic for preattentive processing of separable features. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[25]  T. Salthouse,et al.  Adult age and the speed-accuracy trade-off. , 1979, Ergonomics.

[26]  T. Salthouse.  Speed of behavior and its implications for cog-nition , 1985 .