Our work is aimed at studying the optimization of a complex motor behaviour from a global perspective. First, ‘free climbing’ as a sport will be briefly introduced while emphasizing in particular its psychomotor aspect called ‘route finding’. The basic question raised here is how does the optimization of a sensorimotoricity-environment system take place. The material under study is the free climber's trajectory, viewed as the ‘signature’ of climbing behaviour (i.e., the spatial dimension). The concepts of learning, optimization, constraint, and degrees of freedom of a system will be discussed using the synergistic approach to the study of movement (Bernstein, 1967; Kelso, 1977). Measures of a trajectory's length and convex hull can be used to define an index whose equation resembles that of an entropy. This index is a measure of the trajectory's overall complexity. Some important concepts related to the thermodynamics of curves will also be discussed. The optimization process will be studied by examining the changes in entropy over time for a set of trajectories generated during the learning of a route (ten successive repetitions of the same climb). It will be shown that the entropy of the trajectories decreases as learning progresses, that each level of expertise has its own characteristic entropy curve, and that for the subjects tested, the mean entropy of skilled climbers is lower than that of average climbers. Basing our analysis on the concepts of degrees of freedom and constraint equations, an attempt is made to relate trajectory entropy to system entropy. Based on the postulate that trajectory entropy is equal to the difference in entropy between the unconstrained and constrained system, a model of motor optimization is proposed. This model is illustrated by an entropy graph reflecting a dynamic release process. In the light of our results, two opposing views will be examined: movement construction vs. movement emergence.
[1]
Ronald G. Marteniuk,et al.
Human Movement Organization and Learning As Revealed by Variability of Movement, use of Kinematic Information, and Fourier Analysis
,
1983
.
[2]
J. Kelso.
Motor control mechanisms underlying human movement reproduction.
,
1977,
Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[3]
M. Turvey.
The bernstein perspective I
,
1982
.
[4]
L. Santaló.
Integral geometry and geometric probability
,
1976
.
[5]
Gregor Schöner,et al.
A dynamic pattern theory of behavioral change
,
1988
.
[6]
P. N. Kugler,et al.
1 On the Concept of Coordinative Structures as Dissipative Structures: I. Theoretical Lines of Convergence*
,
1980
.
[7]
S. Keele,et al.
The Structure of Motor Programs
,
1976
.
[8]
B. Vereijken,et al.
Free(z)ing Degrees of Freedom in Skill Acquisition
,
1992
.
[9]
N. A. Bernshteĭn.
The co-ordination and regulation of movements
,
1967
.
[10]
H. Pattee.
DYNAMIC AND LINGUISTIC MODES OF COMPLEX SYSTEMS
,
1977
.