Non-canonical passives in Chinese

Abstract This paper examines a non-canonical passive construction in Chinese. In this construction, the passive marker bei can proceed a constituent including intransitive verbs, adjectives and nouns, in such expressions as bei zisha/‘commit suicide,’ bei xingfu/‘happy’ or bei gaotie/‘high speed train.’ Following Mental Space Theory (Fauconnier 1994, 1997), this paper argues that the construction serves as a space builder, which prompts conceptualizers to build a counterfactual space to hold the event conveyed by the constituent but deny the event or its associated assumption in the base space. The Mental Space operations produce the interpretations of the construction featured by ambiguity and irony. This study demonstrates the existence of dedicated counterfactual constructions in Chinese. It showcases an attempt to posit cognitive operations as the constructional function and outlines a cognitively plausible procedure to derive specific interpretations of the construction in the context.

[1]  Paul Sambre,et al.  Gilles Fauconnier & Mark Turner, " The way we think: conceptual blending and the mind's hidden complexities" , 2002 .

[2]  Deirdre Wilson.  Reassessing the conceptual–procedural distinction , 2016 .

[3]  B. Dancygier.  Conditionals and Prediction: Time, Knowledge and Causation in Conditional Constructions , 1998 .

[4]  Qian Yong.  A Corpus-Based Study of Counterfactuals in Mandarin , 2016 .

[5]  Reinhard Riedl,et al.  Meaning and Relevance , 2001, Cognitive Technology.

[6]  Zhuo Jing-Schmidt,et al.  Embodied semantics and pragmatics: Empathy, sympathy and two passive constructions in Chinese media , 2011 .

[7]  R. Langacker.  Reference-point constructions , 1993 .

[8]  Gilles Fauconnier,et al.  Mental Spaces: Aspects of Meaning Construction in Natural Language , 1985 .

[9]  Diane Blakemore,et al.  Indicators and procedures: nevertheless and but , 2000, Journal of Linguistics.

[10]  A. Bloom,et al.  The Linguistic Shaping of Thought: A Study in the Impact of Language on Thinking in China and the West , 1981 .

[11]  H. Boomgaarden,et al.  Image Versus Text: How Newspaper Reports Affect Evaluations of Political Candidates , 2016 .

[12]  B. Dancygier.  The Language of Stories: A Cognitive Approach , 2011 .

[13]  Lisa Garbern Liu.  Reasoning counterfactually in Chinese: Are there any obstacles? , 1985, Cognition.

[14]  C. Burgers,et al.  Verbal Irony , 2012 .

[15]  A. Georgopoulos.  The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind’s Hidden Complexities.ByGilles Fauconnierand, Mark Turner.New York: Basic Books. $35.00. xix + 440 p; ill.; index. ISBN: 0–465–08785–X. 2002. , 2003 .

[16]  Zhuo Jing-Schmidt,et al.  What are they good for? A constructionist account of counterfactuals in ordinary Chinese , 2017 .

[17]  G. Lakoff,et al.  Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind , 1988 .

[18]  T. Au,et al.  Chinese and English counterfactuals: The Sapir-Whorf hypothesis revisited , 1983, Cognition.

[19]  Alexander Ziem,et al.  Frames of Understanding in Text and Discourse: Theoretical foundations and descriptive applications , 2014 .

[20]  D. Blakemore.  Denial and contrast: A relevance theoretic analysis ofbut , 1989 .

[21]  Joan L. Bybee,et al.  Language, Usage and Cognition , 2010 .

[22]  John R. Taylor,et al.  Possessives in English : an exploration in cognitive grammar , 1996 .

[23]  W. Bruce Croft.  Verbs: Aspect and Causal Structure , 2012 .

[24]  Franziska Frankfurter,et al.  Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure: Adele E. Goldberg, Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press, 1995. xi + 265 pp , 1998 .

[25]  Alison Hall,et al.  Do discourse connectives encode concepts or procedures , 2007 .

[26]  William Croft,et al.  Radical Construction Grammar: Syntactic Theory in Typological Perspective , 2001 .

[27]  Xinren Chen.  Extensions of the Chinese passive construction: A memetic account , 2017 .

[28]  Zhu Jun-wei.  A Construction Grammar Approach to "bei XX" Structure , 2010 .

[29]  Robert A. Harris,et al.  Figurative language , 2021, The Craft of Poetry.

[30]  R. Carston.  The heterogeneity of procedural meaning , 2016 .

[31]  Jun Yao,et al.  The ironical Chinese bei-construction and its accessibility to English speakers , 2013 .

[32]  Adele E. Goldberg,et al.  Constructions at Work , 2005 .

[33]  G. Fauconnier.  Mappings in thought and language , 1997 .

[34]  Joan L. Bybee,et al.  Frequency of Use and the Organization of Language , 2006 .

[35]  Gilles Fauconnier,et al.  Conceptual Integration Networks , 1998, Cogn. Sci..

[36]  R. Giora.  On irony and negation , 1995 .

[37]  D. Sperber,et al.  Relevance: Communication and Cognition , 1997 .

[38]  G. Lakoff.  Women, fire, and dangerous things : what categories reveal about the mind , 1989 .

[39]  Ronald W. Langacker,et al.  Cognitive Grammar: A Basic Introduction , 2008 .

[40]  Ines Gloeckner,et al.  Relevance Communication And Cognition , 2016 .

[41]  Terry Kit-fong Au.  Counterfactuals: In reply to Alfred Bloom , 1984, Cognition.

[42]  Eve Sweetser,et al.  Mental Spaces in Grammar: Conditional Constructions , 2005 .

[43]  A. Bezuidenhout,et al.  Procedural Meaning and the Semantics / Pragmatics Interface , 2004 .

[44]  Diane Brockway,et al.  Semantic constraints on relevance , 1981 .