Non-invasive ultrasonic modulation of visual evoked response by GABA delivery through the blood brain barrier

We demonstrate the feasibility of non-invasively modulating the visual cortex activity of non-human primates by local ultrasound-induced delivery of an inhibitory neurotransmitter (GABA). GABA was injected intravenously after the blood brain barrier (BBB) was transiently disrupted with focused ultrasound (FUS) coupled with ultrasound contrast agents (UCA). Visual evoked potentials exhibited a significant and progressive decrease of the activity. Combined effects of neuromodulation and BBB opening were shown to be 8.7 times less important than GABA-induced inhibition. During the sonication, the UCA harmonic response was monitored to estimate the level of stable cavitation (signature of BBB opening efficiency) and to avoid damages due to inertial cavitation (automatic shutdown of the sonication when detected). As recent developments in beam forming have shown that ultrasound beams can be focused non-invasively in deep-seated human brain locations, our results hold promise to explore and treat the brain with a non-invasive, controllable, repeatable and reversible method.

[1]  anonymous In Review , 2018 .

[2]  Thomas Deffieux,et al.  3D-printed adaptive acoustic lens as a disruptive technology for transcranial ultrasound therapy using single-element transducers , 2018, Physics in medicine and biology.

[3]  G Wilson Miller,et al.  Noninvasive neuromodulation and thalamic mapping with low-intensity focused ultrasound. , 2017, Journal of neurosurgery.

[4]  C. Yeh,et al.  Ultrasound targeted CNS gene delivery for Parkinson's disease treatment , 2017, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[5]  William J Tyler,et al.  Ultrasonic neuromodulation , 2017, 2017 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium (IUS).

[6]  Thomas Deffieux,et al.  Transcranial ultrasonic stimulation modulates single-neuron discharge in macaques performing an antisaccade task , 2017, Brain Stimulation.

[7]  J-F Aubry,et al.  Ex vivo optimisation of a heterogeneous speed of sound model of the human skull for non-invasive transcranial focused ultrasound at 1 MHz , 2017, International journal of hyperthermia : the official journal of European Society for Hyperthermic Oncology, North American Hyperthermia Group.

[8]  Thomas Deffieux,et al.  A 200–1380-kHz Quadrifrequency Focused Ultrasound Transducer for Neurostimulation in Rodents and Primates: Transcranial In Vitro Calibration and Numerical Study of the Influence of Skull Cavity , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control.

[9]  Thomas Deffieux,et al.  Erratum to “A 200–1380 kHz Quadrifrequency Focused Ultrasound Transducer for Neurostimulation in Rodents and Primates: Transcranial In Vitro Calibration and Numerical Study of the Influence of Skull Cavity” , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control.

[10]  Elisa E Konofagou,et al.  Focused ultrasound neuromodulation of cortical and subcortical brain structures using 1.9 MHz. , 2016, Medical physics.

[11]  M. Wintermark,et al.  Non-Invasive, Focal Disconnection of Brain Circuitry Using Magnetic Resonance-Guided Low-Intensity Focused Ultrasound to Deliver a Neurotoxin. , 2016, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[12]  Kim Butts Pauly,et al.  Frequency Dependence of Ultrasound Neurostimulation in the Mouse Brain. , 2016, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[13]  K. Hoang-Xuan,et al.  Clinical trial of blood-brain barrier disruption by pulsed ultrasound , 2016, Science Translational Medicine.

[14]  Natalia Vykhodtseva,et al.  Acoustic neuromodulation from a basic science prospective , 2016, Journal of therapeutic ultrasound.

[15]  Hai-Rong Zheng,et al.  Improved Anatomical Specificity of Non-invasive Neuro-stimulation by High Frequency (5 MHz) Ultrasound , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[16]  Wonhye Lee,et al.  Image-Guided Focused Ultrasound-Mediated Regional Brain Stimulation in Sheep. , 2016, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[17]  Shy Shoham,et al.  Ultrasonic neuromodulation , 2016, Journal of neural engineering.

[18]  Chanikarn Power,et al.  Targeted, noninvasive blockade of cortical neuronal activity , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[19]  S. Yoo,et al.  Image-Guided Transcranial Focused Ultrasound Stimulates Human Primary Somatosensory Cortex , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[20]  Nathan McDannold,et al.  Ultrasound-mediated blood-brain barrier disruption for targeted drug delivery in the central nervous system , 2014, Defense + Security Symposium.

[21]  W. Tyler,et al.  Transcranial Focused Ultrasound Modulates Intrinsic and Evoked EEG Dynamics , 2014, Brain Stimulation.

[22]  Meaghan A. O'Reilly,et al.  Stimulation of Hippocampal Neurogenesis by Transcranial Focused Ultrasound and Microbubbles in Adult Mice , 2014, Brain Stimulation.

[23]  A. Williams,et al.  Transcranial focused ultrasound modulates the activity of primary somatosensory cortex in humans , 2014, Nature Neuroscience.

[24]  Jean-Francois Aubry,et al.  Trans-cranial focused ultrasound without hair shaving: feasibility study in an ex vivo cadaver model , 2014, Journal of therapeutic ultrasound.

[25]  M. Tanter,et al.  Low intensity focused ultrasound modulates monkey visuomotor behavior , 2013, Current Biology.

[26]  Max Wintermark,et al.  A pilot study of focused ultrasound thalamotomy for essential tremor. , 2013, The New England journal of medicine.

[27]  M. Fink,et al.  Influence of the pressure field distribution in transcranial ultrasonic neurostimulation. , 2013, Medical physics.

[28]  Max Wintermark,et al.  A magnetic resonance imaging, histological, and dose modeling comparison of focused ultrasound, radiofrequency, and Gamma Knife radiosurgery lesions in swine thalamus. , 2013, Journal of neurosurgery.

[29]  Charles E. Schroeder,et al.  What does polarity inversion of extrastriate activity tell us about striate contributions to the early VEP? A comment on Ales et al. (2010) , 2013, NeuroImage.

[30]  J. Wan,et al.  Ultrasound can modulate neuronal development: impact on neurite growth and cell body morphology. , 2013, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[31]  Mathieu Pernot,et al.  Targeting accuracy of transcranial magnetic resonance-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound brain therapy: a fresh cadaver model. , 2013, Journal of neurosurgery.

[32]  K. Hynynen,et al.  MR-guided focused ultrasound thalamotomy for essential tremor: a proof-of-concept study , 2013, The Lancet Neurology.

[33]  W. Newsome,et al.  Effective parameters for ultrasound-induced in vivo neurostimulation. , 2013, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[34]  Mickael Tanter,et al.  Dynamic Study of Blood–Brain Barrier Closure after its Disruption using Ultrasound: A Quantitative Analysis , 2012, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[35]  Natalia Vykhodtseva,et al.  Temporary disruption of the blood-brain barrier by use of ultrasound and microbubbles: safety and efficacy evaluation in rhesus macaques. , 2012, Cancer research.

[36]  L. Merabet,et al.  Clinical research with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS): Challenges and future directions , 2012, Brain Stimulation.

[37]  D. Hansel,et al.  Abstract 3652: Pegylated arginine deiminase (ADI-PEG20) as a potential therapeutic agent for rarer variants of bladder cancer that are deficient for argininosuccinate synthetase , 2012 .

[38]  V. Ferrera,et al.  Noninvasive, Transient and Selective Blood-Brain Barrier Opening in Non-Human Primates In Vivo , 2011, PloS one.

[39]  Jong-Hwan Lee,et al.  Focused ultrasound modulates region-specific brain activity , 2011, NeuroImage.

[40]  F. Horak,et al.  Deep brain stimulation for Parkinson disease: an expert consensus and review of key issues. , 2011, Archives of neurology.

[41]  W. Pardridge The blood-brain barrier: Bottleneck in brain drug development , 2005, NeuroRx : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics.

[42]  Justin M. Ales,et al.  V1 is not uniquely identified by polarity reversals of responses to upper and lower visual field stimuli , 2010, NeuroImage.

[43]  Yao-Sheng Tung,et al.  Multi-modality safety assessment of blood-brain barrier opening using focused ultrasound and definity microbubbles: a short-term study. , 2010, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[44]  Mu-Yi Hua,et al.  Magnetic resonance monitoring of focused ultrasound/magnetic nanoparticle targeting delivery of therapeutic agents to the brain , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[45]  S. Tillery,et al.  Transcranial Pulsed Ultrasound Stimulates Intact Brain Circuits , 2010, Neuron.

[46]  Á. Pascual-Leone,et al.  Treatment of depression with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS): A Review , 2009, Experimental Neurology.

[47]  Nikos K. Logothetis,et al.  Visually Driven Activation in Macaque Areas V2 and V3 without Input from the Primary Visual Cortex , 2009, PloS one.

[48]  Yusuf Tufail,et al.  Remote Excitation of Neuronal Circuits Using Low-Intensity, Low-Frequency Ultrasound , 2008, PloS one.

[49]  K. Hynynen,et al.  Blood-brain barrier disruption induced by focused ultrasound and circulating preformed microbubbles appears to be characterized by the mechanical index. , 2008, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[50]  M. Kringelbach,et al.  Translational principles of deep brain stimulation , 2007, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[51]  A. Brayman,et al.  Correlation between inertial cavitation dose and endothelial cell damage in vivo. , 2006, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[52]  Saurabh Datta,et al.  Correlation of cavitation with ultrasound enhancement of thrombolysis. , 2006, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[53]  A. Sillito,et al.  Always returning: feedback and sensory processing in visual cortex and thalamus , 2006, Trends in Neurosciences.

[54]  P. Mitchell,et al.  A review of the efficacy of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) treatment for depression, and current and future strategies to optimize efficacy. , 2005, Journal of affective disorders.

[55]  Juha Silvanto,et al.  Double dissociation of V1 and V5/MT activity in visual awareness. , 2005, Cerebral cortex.

[56]  A. Lozano,et al.  Deep Brain Stimulation for Treatment-Resistant Depression , 2005, Neuron.

[57]  Ferenc A. Jolesz,et al.  Local and reversible blood–brain barrier disruption by noninvasive focused ultrasound at frequencies suitable for trans-skull sonications , 2005, NeuroImage.

[58]  Koji Nomura,et al.  Challenges and Future Directions , 2005 .

[59]  Lawrence C. Sincich,et al.  Bypassing V1: a direct geniculate input to area MT , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[60]  K. Hynynen,et al.  MRI investigation of the threshold for thermally induced blood–brain barrier disruption and brain tissue damage in the rabbit brain , 2004, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[61]  H. Kennedy,et al.  Projection of the lateral geniculate nucleus onto cortical area V2 in the macaque monkey , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[62]  A. Misra,et al.  Drug delivery to the central nervous system: a review. , 2003, Journal of pharmacy & pharmaceutical sciences : a publication of the Canadian Society for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Societe canadienne des sciences pharmaceutiques.

[63]  Chi-Hung Juan,et al.  Feedback to V1: a reverse hierarchy in vision , 2003, Experimental Brain Research.

[64]  K. Hynynen,et al.  Noninvasive MR imaging-guided focal opening of the blood-brain barrier in rabbits. , 2001, Radiology.

[65]  Sarah H Lisanby,et al.  Therapeutic application of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation: a review , 2001, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[66]  P Girard,et al.  Feedback connections act on the early part of the responses in monkey visual cortex. , 2001, Journal of neurophysiology.

[67]  J. Bullier,et al.  Response modulations by static texture surround in area V1 of the macaque monkey do not depend on feedback connections from V2. , 2001, Journal of neurophysiology.

[68]  J. R. Scotti,et al.  Available From , 1973 .

[69]  Alan Cowey,et al.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation and cognitive neuroscience , 2000, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[70]  R. Coleman Parkinson's disease: treatment , 2000, Pharmaceutical Journal.

[71]  M. Ptito,et al.  Activation of Human Extrageniculostriate Pathways after Damage to Area V1 , 1999, NeuroImage.

[72]  C. Schroeder,et al.  A spatiotemporal profile of visual system activation revealed by current source density analysis in the awake macaque. , 1998, Cerebral cortex.

[73]  J. M. Hupé,et al.  Cortical feedback improves discrimination between figure and background by V1, V2 and V3 neurons , 1998, Nature.

[74]  A. Leventhal,et al.  Signal timing across the macaque visual system. , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.

[75]  E. Neuwelt,et al.  Outwitting the blood-brain barrier for therapeutic purposes: osmotic opening and other means. , 1998, Neurosurgery.

[76]  Timothy G. Leighton,et al.  The subharmonic oscillations and combination-frequency emissions from a resonant bubble: their properties and generation mechanisms , 1997 .

[77]  I. Romero,et al.  Transporting therapeutics across the blood-brain barrier. , 1996, Molecular medicine today.

[78]  K Hynynen,et al.  Histologic effects of high intensity pulsed ultrasound exposure with subharmonic emission in rabbit brain in vivo. , 1995, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[79]  D. Royer,et al.  Quantitative imaging of transient acoustic fields by optical heterodyne interferometry , 1994, 1994 Proceedings of IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium.

[80]  P. Schiller,et al.  Effect of cooling area 18 on striate cortex cells in the squirrel monkey. , 1982, Journal of neurophysiology.

[81]  L. Crum,et al.  Acoustic Cavitation , 1982 .

[82]  K. Yoshida,et al.  The afferent and efferent organization of the lateral geniculo‐prestriate pathways in the macaque monkey , 1981, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[83]  K. Yoshida,et al.  The projection from the dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus of the thalamus to extrastriate visual association cortex in the macaque monkey , 1981, Neuroscience Letters.

[84]  K. Elliott,et al.  DISPOSITION OF γ‐AMINOBUTYRIC ACID ADMINISTERED TO MAMMALS * , 1958 .

[85]  J. R.,et al.  Quantitative analysis , 1892, Nature.