Control of information in working memory: Encoding and removal of distractors in the complex-span paradigm

The article reports four experiments with complex-span tasks in which encoding of memory items alternates with processing of distractors. The experiments test two assumptions of a computational model of complex span, SOB-CS: (1) distractor processing impairs memory because distractors are encoded into working memory, thereby interfering with memoranda; and (2) free time following distractors is used to remove them from working memory by unbinding their representations from list context. Experiment 1 shows that distractors are erroneously chosen for recall more often than not-presented stimuli, demonstrating that distractors are encoded into memory. Distractor intrusions declined with longer free time, as predicted by distractor removal. Experiment 2 shows these effects even when distractors precede the memory list, ruling out an account based on selective rehearsal of memoranda during free time. Experiments 3 and 4 test the notion that distractors decay over time. Both experiments show that, contrary to the notion of distractor decay, the chance of a distractor intruding at test does not decline with increasing time since encoding of that distractor. Experiment 4 provides additional evidence against the prediction from distractor decay that distractor intrusions decline over an unfilled retention interval. Taken together, the results support SOB-CS and rule out alternative explanations. Data and simulation code are available on Open Science Framework: osf.io/3ewh7.

[1]  Stephan Lewandowsky,et al.  Working memory updating involves item-specific removal , 2014 .

[2]  Francesca Pazzaglia,et al.  Increases in Intrusion Errors and Working Memory Deficit of Poor Comprehenders , 1998, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[3]  Stephan Lewandowsky,et al.  Interference-Based Forgetting in Verbal Short-Term Memory. , 2008 .

[4]  J. Rouder.  Optional stopping: No problem for Bayesians , 2014, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[5]  Ullrich K. H. Ecker,et al.  Removal of information from working memory: A specific updating process , 2014 .

[6]  Simon Farrell,et al.  A test of interference versus decay in working memory: Varying distraction within lists in a complex span task , 2016 .

[7]  L Hasher,et al.  Working memory span and the role of proactive interference. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[8]  Nelson Cowan,et al.  Loss of visual working memory within seconds: the combined use of refreshable and non-refreshable features. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[9]  Michael F. Bunting,et al.  Proactive interference and item similarity in working memory. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[10]  Simon Farrell,et al.  Modeling working memory: An interference model of complex span , 2012, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[11]  P. Barrouillet,et al.  Time and cognitive load in working memory. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[12]  Simon Farrell,et al.  Temporal clustering and sequencing in short-term memory and episodic memory. , 2012, Psychological review.

[13]  Simon Farrell,et al.  Interference between maintenance and processing in working memory: the effect of item-distractor similarity in complex span. , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[14]  Stephan Lewandowsky,et al.  Turning simple span into complex span: Time for decay or interference from distractors? , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[15]  Robert Miller,et al.  Learning and Individual Differences , 2010 .

[16]  Richard L. Lewis,et al.  In search of decay in verbal short-term memory. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[17]  M. Humphreys,et al.  Transient phonemic codes and immunity to proactive interference , 1995, Memory & cognition.

[18]  S. Lewandowsky,et al.  An endogenous distributed model of ordering in serial recall , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[19]  P. Carpenter,et al.  Individual differences in working memory and reading , 1980 .

[20]  Nelson Cowan,et al.  Differences between presentation methods in working memory procedures: a matter of working memory consolidation. , 2014, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[21]  Richard D. Morey,et al.  Simple relation between Bayesian order-restricted and point-null hypothesis tests , 2014 .

[22]  M. Usher,et al.  The demise of short-term memory revisited: empirical and computational investigations of recency effects. , 2005, Psychological review.

[23]  Klaus Oberauer,et al.  Understanding serial position curves in short-term recognition and recall. , 2003 .

[24]  Nelson Cowan,et al.  Time-based loss in visual short-term memory is from trace decay, not temporal distinctiveness. , 2014, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[25]  Nelson Cowan,et al.  How verbal memory loads consume attention , 2009, Memory & cognition.

[26]  S. Lewandowsky,et al.  Forgetting in immediate serial recall: decay, temporal distinctiveness, or interference? , 2008, Psychological review.

[27]  Tom Mercer,et al.  Rapid Communication: The loss of residual visual memories over the passage of time , 2015, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[28]  G. Logan.  Toward an instance theory of automatization. , 1988 .

[29]  D. McKeown,et al.  Short-term forgetting without interference. , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[30]  S. Luck,et al.  Sudden Death and Gradual Decay in Visual Working Memory , 2009, Psychological science.

[31]  Gordon D. A. Brown,et al.  Time does not cause forgetting in short-term serial recall , 2004, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[32]  Klaus Oberauer,et al.  Design for a working memory. , 2009 .

[33]  Gordon D. A. Brown,et al.  A temporal ratio model of memory. , 2007, Psychological review.

[34]  G J Hitch,et al.  On the interpretation of working memory span in adults , 2000, Memory & cognition.

[35]  Lynn Hasher,et al.  Working memory, inhibitory control, and reading disability , 2000, Memory & cognition.

[36]  Nelson Cowan,et al.  Deconfounding Serial Recall , 2002 .

[37]  A. Baddeley.  Working memory: theories, models, and controversies. , 2012, Annual review of psychology.

[38]  D. Barr,et al.  Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. , 2013, Journal of memory and language.

[39]  Simon Farrell,et al.  Mixed-List Phonological Similarity Effects in Delayed Serial Recall. , 2006 .

[40]  H. Pashler.  Dual-task interference in simple tasks: data and theory. , 1994, Psychological bulletin.

[41]  Marc W. Howard,et al.  A distributed representation of temporal context , 2002 .

[42]  A. Raftery.  Bayesian Model Selection in Social Research , 1995 .

[43]  R. Engle,et al.  Is working memory capacity task dependent , 1989 .

[44]  Randall W Engle,et al.  Working memory, short-term memory, and general fluid intelligence: a latent-variable approach. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[45]  Paola Palladino,et al.  Intrusion errors in working memory tasks , 2000 .

[46]  M. Lee,et al.  Statistical Evidence in Experimental Psychology , 2011, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[47]  N. Burgess.  Memory for Serial Order : A Network Model of the Phonological Loop and its Timing , 1999 .

[48]  E. Wagenmakers.  A practical solution to the pervasive problems ofp values , 2007, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[49]  Tom Mercer,et al.  Decay uncovered in nonverbal short-term memory , 2014, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[50]  Jeffrey N. Rouder,et al.  Default Bayes factors for ANOVA designs , 2012 .

[51]  Stephan Lewandowsky,et al.  Evidence against decay in verbal working memory. , 2013, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[52]  P. Barrouillet,et al.  Visual and spatial working memory are not that dissociated after all: a time-based resource-sharing account. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[53]  Michael F. Bunting,et al.  Working memory span tasks: A methodological review and user’s guide , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[54]  Stephan Lewandowsky,et al.  No temporal decay in verbal short-term memory , 2009, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[55]  Roger Bakeman,et al.  Picturing repeated measures: Comments on Loftus, Morrison, and others , 1996 .

[56]  Simon Farrell,et al.  Short-Term Memory: New Data and a Model , 2008 .

[57]  Marc W Howard,et al.  A context-based theory of recency and contiguity in free recall. , 2008, Psychological review.

[58]  R. Engle,et al.  The nature of individual differences in working memory capacity: active maintenance in primary memory and controlled search from secondary memory. , 2007, Psychological review.

[59]  Sean M. Polyn,et al.  Human memory reconsolidation can be explained using the temporal context model , 2011, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[60]  Stephan Lewandowsky,et al.  Further evidence against decay in working memory , 2014 .

[61]  J. Myerson,et al.  Age differences in proactive interference, working memory, and abstract reasoning. , 2008, Psychology and aging.

[62]  G D Brown,et al.  Oscillator-based memory for serial order. , 2000, Psychological review.

[63]  Nelson Cowan,et al.  Working Memory Capacity , 2005 .

[64]  M. Just,et al.  From the SelectedWorks of Marcel Adam Just 1992 A capacity theory of comprehension : Individual differences in working memory , 2017 .

[65]  J. Kruschke.  Doing Bayesian Data Analysis: A Tutorial with R and BUGS , 2010 .

[66]  Stephan Lewandowsky,et al.  Rehearsal in serial recall: An unworkable solution to the nonexistent problem of decay. , 2015, Psychological review.