Challenges to the development of an airworthiness regulatory framework for unmanned aircraft systems

This paper presents some of the challenges associated with development of an airworthiness regulatory framework for Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS). The risk paradigm and a simple model describing the regulatory trade-space are developed. The model is used to explain fundamental differences between the regulation of manned and unmanned aircraft. General challenges are presented and the possible regulatory approaches are discussed. Moving forward, it is concluded that the development of an effective airworthiness regulatory framework for UAS should follow a systematic and risk-based process of: 1) specifying safety policy and the safety objectives, 2) developing an airworthiness classification framework, and 3) identifying a regulatory approach suitable to each airworthiness category. These activities should be undertaken before the development of low-level airworthiness standards and procedures.

[1]  Reece A. Clothier,et al.  A review of the concept of autonomy in the context of the safety regulation of civil unmanned aircraft systems. , 2013 .

[2]  Reece A. Clothier,et al.  Safety risk management of unmanned aircraft systems , 2015 .

[3]  S.L. MacSween-George,et al.  Will the public accept UAVs for cargo and passenger transportation? , 2003, 2003 IEEE Aerospace Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.03TH8652).

[4]  D. R. Haddon,et al.  Aircraft Airworthiness Certification Standards for Civil UAVs , 2003 .

[5]  Dominique A. Greer,et al.  Risk Perception and the Public Acceptance of Drones , 2015, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[6]  Jl Palmer,et al.  Analysis of the applicability of existing airworthiness classification schemes to the unmanned aircraft fleet , 2013 .

[7]  Joseph A. Paradiso,et al.  Energy scavenging for mobile and wireless electronics , 2005, IEEE Pervasive Computing.

[8]  Jens Rasmussen,et al.  Risk management in a dynamic society: a modelling problem , 1997 .

[9]  Roger Clarke,et al.  The regulation of civilian drones' impacts on public safety , 2014, Comput. Law Secur. Rev..

[10]  Mica R. Endsley,et al.  Designing for Situation Awareness : An Approach to User-Centered Design , 2003 .

[11]  Reece A. Clothier,et al.  Definition of airworthiness categories for civil unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) , 2010 .

[12]  Reece A. Clothier,et al.  Definition of an airworthiness certification framework for civil unmanned aircraft systems , 2011 .

[13]  Reece A. Clothier,et al.  ALARP and the risk management of civil unmanned aircraft systems , 2013 .