Role of Occiput Spinal Angle-A Novel Sonographic Index to predict the outcome of labour

Introduction: The attitude (relationship of head of a fetus to the cervical spine) in the first stage of labour has a significant impact on the outcome of labour. Deflexion of the fetal head is determined by digital vaginal examination during labour. However, different ultra-sonographic indexes have been developed to predict labour outcomes. Occiput spine angle (OSA) is a novel ultra-sonographic marker which can be used to predict operative delivery. Objective: To determine the effect of the occipital spinal angle measured through transabdominal ultrasound during the first stage of labour on the labour outcome. Materials and Methods: This prospective cross-sectional study was carried out at Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Unit 2, Holy Family Hospital, Rawalpindi from June 2020 to Dec 2020 which included 380 low-risk pregnant women in the first active stage of labour. Occipital-spine angle (OSA) was defined as the angle formed by the fetal occiput and the cervical spine on the sagittal plane at the transabdominal ultrasound. For each case, the angle was calculated twice and independently by the 2 radiologists who were unaware of labour outcome to minimize intra and inter-observer error. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 23.0. P-value ≤ 0.05 was considered significant. Results: Incidence of operative delivery was 17.2%. A cut-off value of 1260125.50 of OSA had a sensitivity of 92.3% and specificity of 98.1% to predict operative delivery. Binary Logistic Regression showed that gestational age, OSA, and Head station are significant with the OR= 1.15, 0.711, and 0.32 respectively. Conclusion: OSA is a good predictor of operative delivery at a cut-off value of 1260. It should be determined at routine ultrasound booking during pregnancy. More studies should be conducted to highlight its importance.  

[1]  J. Martin,et al.  Births: Final Data for 2019. , 2021, National vital statistics reports : from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics, National Vital Statistics System.

[2]  A. Dall'asta,et al.  Prediction of spontaneous vaginal delivery in nulliparous women with a prolonged second stage of labor: the value of intrapartum ultrasound. , 2019, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[3]  F. Malone,et al.  Sonographic markers of fetal adiposity and risk of Cesarean delivery , 2019, Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology.

[4]  A. Maged,et al.  Measurement of the fetal occiput-spine angle during the first stage of labor as predictor of the progress and outcome of labor , 2019, The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians.

[5]  N. Morken,et al.  Maternal reasons for requesting planned cesarean section in Norway: a qualitative study , 2019, BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth.

[6]  J. Wise Alarming global rise in caesarean births, figures show , 2018, British Medical Journal.

[7]  Muhammad Saad Malik,et al.  Association of delivery procedure with APGAR scores among neonates born to healthy Pakistani mothers: a pilot study , 2018 .

[8]  H. Orvos,et al.  Predictors of caesarean section – a cross-sectional study in Hungary , 2018, The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians.

[9]  R. Favre,et al.  Predicting the difficulty of operative vaginal delivery by ultrasound measurement of fetal head station , 2017, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[10]  Meeta Gupta,et al.  The rate and indications of caesarean section in a tertiary care hospital at Jaipur, India , 2017 .

[11]  M. Etman,et al.  Intrapartum fetal head circumference and estimated fetal weight as predictors of operative delivery , 2017, International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics.

[12]  G. Pilu,et al.  The "occiput-spine angle": a new sonographic index of fetal head deflexion during the first stage of labor. , 2016, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[13]  Jun Zhang,et al.  The Increasing Trend in Caesarean Section Rates: Global, Regional and National Estimates: 1990-2014 , 2016, PloS one.

[14]  J. Sørensen,et al.  Educational strategies in performing cesarean section , 2013, Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica.

[15]  G. Pilu,et al.  Intrapartum three‐dimensional ultrasonographic imaging of face presentations: report of two cases , 2012, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[16]  Gynecologists Dystocia and the augmentation of labor , 1996, International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics.

[17]  Acog ACOG Practice Bulletin Number 49, December 2003: Dystocia and augmentation of labor. , 2003, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[18]  K. Nicolaides,et al.  Intrapartum sonography to determine fetal head position , 2002, The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians.

[19]  D. Murphy,et al.  Early maternal and neonatal morbidity associated with operative delivery in second stage of labour: a cohort study , 2001, The Lancet.