Interactions with Potential Mis/Disinformation URLs Among U.S. Users on Facebook, 2017-2019

Misinformation and disinformation online---and on social media in particular--- have become a topic of widespread concern. Recently, Facebook and Social Science One released a large, unique, privacy-preserving dataset to researchers that contains data on URLs shared on Facebook in 2017-2019, including how users interacted with posts and demographic data from those users. We conduct an exploratory analysis of this data through the lens of mis/disinformation, finding that posts containing potential and known mis/disinformation URLs drew substantial user engagement. We also find that older and more politically conservative U.S. users were more likely to be exposed to (and ultimately re-share) potential mis/disinformation, but that those users who were exposed were roughly equally likely to click regardless of demographics. We discuss the implications of our findings for platform interventions and further study towards understanding and reducing the spread of mis/disinformation on social media.

[1]  G. King,et al.  Statistically Valid Inferences from Differentially Private Data Releases, with Application to the Facebook URLs Dataset , 2022, Political Analysis.

[2]  Harsh Taneja,et al.  Platform enclosure of human behavior and its measurement: Using behavioral trace data against platform episteme , 2020, New Media Soc..

[3]  Joshua A. Tucker,et al.  Cracking Open the News Feed , 2021, Journal of Quantitative Description: Digital Media.

[4]  Samuel Spies How Misinformation Spreads , 2020 .

[5]  Tanushree Mitra,et al.  Measuring Misinformation in Video Search Platforms: An Audit Study on YouTube , 2020, Proc. ACM Hum. Comput. Interact..

[6]  Christine Geeng,et al.  Fake News on Facebook and Twitter: Investigating How People (Don't) Investigate , 2020, CHI.

[7]  B. Nyhan,et al.  Exposure to untrustworthy websites in the 2016 U.S. election , 2020, Nature Human Behaviour.

[8]  Tadayoshi Kohno,et al.  Bad News: Clickbait and Deceptive Ads on News and Misinformation Websites , 2020 .

[9]  G. King,et al.  Facebook Privacy-Protected Full URLs Data Set , 2020 .

[10]  Jessica T. Feezell,et al.  ‘I saw it on Facebook’: an experimental analysis of political learning through social media , 2019 .

[11]  R. Kelly Garrett,et al.  Flagging Facebook Falsehoods: Self-Identified Humor Warnings Outperform Fact Checker and Peer Warnings , 2019, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[12]  David G. Rand,et al.  The Implied Truth Effect: Attaching Warnings to a Subset of Fake News Headlines Increases Perceived Accuracy of Headlines Without Warnings , 2019, Manag. Sci..

[13]  Ceren Budak,et al.  What happened? The Spread of Fake News Publisher Content During the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election , 2019, WWW.

[14]  Fabrício Benevenuto,et al.  (Mis)Information Dissemination in WhatsApp: Gathering, Analyzing and Countermeasures , 2019, WWW.

[15]  Yanqin Lu Incidental Exposure to Political Disagreement on Facebook and Corrective Participation: Unraveling the Effects of Emotional Responses and Issue Relevance , 2019 .

[16]  Edson C. Tandoc Tell Me Who Your Sources Are , 2019 .

[17]  D. Lazer,et al.  Fake news on Twitter during the 2016 U.S. presidential election , 2019, Science.

[18]  Suzan Verberne,et al.  The reach of commercially motivated junk news on Facebook , 2019, PloS one.

[19]  Mia Moody-Ramirez,et al.  Analysis of Facebook Meme Groups Used During the 2016 US Presidential Election , 2019, Social Media + Society.

[20]  Joshua A. Tucker,et al.  Less than you think: Prevalence and predictors of fake news dissemination on Facebook , 2019, Science Advances.

[21]  Animesh Mukherjee,et al.  Spread of Hate Speech in Online Social Media , 2018, WebSci.

[22]  Hernán A. Makse,et al.  CUNY Academic Works , 2022 .

[23]  Kate Starbird,et al.  Acting the Part , 2018, Proc. ACM Hum. Comput. Interact..

[24]  Deen Freelon Computational Research in the Post-API Age , 2018, Political Communication.

[25]  Tanushree Mitra,et al.  Conspiracies Online: User Discussions in a Conspiracy Community Following Dramatic Events , 2018, ICWSM.

[26]  Neha Gupta,et al.  Falling for Fake News: Investigating the Consumption of News via Social Media , 2018, CHI.

[27]  Sinan Aral,et al.  The spread of true and false news online , 2018, Science.

[28]  Miriam J. Metzger,et al.  The science of fake news , 2018, Science.

[29]  Giovanni Luca Ciampaglia,et al.  The spread of low-credibility content by social bots , 2017, Nature Communications.

[30]  L. Stewart,et al.  Acting the Part: Examining Information Operations Within #BlackLivesMatter Discourse , 2018, Proc. ACM Hum. Comput. Interact..

[31]  Kate Starbird,et al.  Ecosystem or Echo-System? Exploring Content Sharing across Alternative Media Domains , 2018, ICWSM.

[32]  Daniela Stockmann,et al.  We Don't Know What We Don't Know: When and How the Use of Twitter's Public APIs Biases Scientific Inference , 2017 .

[33]  Eric Horvitz,et al.  Geographic and Temporal Trends in Fake News Consumption During the 2016 US Presidential Election , 2017, CIKM.

[34]  Karen M. Douglas,et al.  Prevention is better than cure: Addressing anti‐vaccine conspiracy theories , 2017 .

[35]  A. L. Schmidt,et al.  Anatomy of news consumption on Facebook , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[36]  Guido Caldarelli,et al.  Users Polarization on Facebook and Youtube , 2016, PloS one.

[37]  G. Caldarelli,et al.  The spreading of misinformation online , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[38]  Joshua A. Tucker,et al.  Is Online Political Communication More Than an Echo Chamber? , 2022 .

[39]  Emily K. Vraga,et al.  In Related News, That Was Wrong: The Correction of Misinformation Through Related Stories Functionality in Social Media , 2015 .

[40]  Lada A. Adamic,et al.  Exposure to ideologically diverse news and opinion on Facebook , 2015, Science.

[41]  Ji Young Lee,et al.  To Tweet or to Retweet? That Is the Question for Health Professionals on Twitter , 2013, Health communication.

[42]  Cynthia Dwork,et al.  Calibrating Noise to Sensitivity in Private Data Analysis , 2006, TCC.

[43]  B. Orlove,et al.  Social Science Research Council , 1964, Nature.