An Alternative Myoelectric Pattern Recognition Approach for the Control of Hand Prostheses: A Case Study of Use in Daily Life by a Dysmelia Subject

The functionality of upper limb prostheses can be improved by intuitive control strategies that use bioelectric signals measured at the stump level. One such strategy is the decoding of motor volition via myoelectric pattern recognition (MPR), which has shown promising results in controlled environments and more recently in clinical practice. Moreover, not much has been reported about daily life implementation and real-time accuracy of these decoding algorithms. This paper introduces an alternative approach in which MPR allows intuitive control of four different grips and open/close in a multifunctional prosthetic hand. We conducted a clinical proof-of-concept in activities of daily life by constructing a self-contained, MPR-controlled, transradial prosthetic system provided with a novel user interface meant to log errors during real-time operation. The system was used for five days by a unilateral dysmelia subject whose hand had never developed, and who nevertheless learned to generate patterns of myoelectric activity, reported as intuitive, for multi-functional prosthetic control. The subject was instructed to manually log errors when they occurred via the user interface mounted on the prosthesis. This allowed the collection of information about prosthesis usage and real-time classification accuracy. The assessment of capacity for myoelectric control test was used to compare the proposed approach to the conventional prosthetic control approach, direct control. Regarding the MPR approach, the subject reported a more intuitive control when selecting the different grips, but also a higher uncertainty during proportional continuous movements. This paper represents an alternative to the conventional use of MPR, and this alternative may be particularly suitable for a certain type of amputee patients. Moreover, it represents a further validation of MPR with dysmelia cases.

[1]  Todd A Kuiken,et al.  Real-time simultaneous and proportional myoelectric control using intramuscular EMG , 2014, Journal of neural engineering.

[2]  T S Kuo,et al.  Real-time implementation of electromyogram pattern recognition as a control command of man-machine interface. , 1996, Medical engineering & physics.

[3]  David Hankin,et al.  First-in-man demonstration of a fully implanted myoelectric sensors system to control an advanced electromechanical prosthetic hand , 2015, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[4]  M. Swiontkowski Targeted Muscle Reinnervation for Real-time Myoelectric Control of Multifunction Artificial Arms , 2010 .

[5]  Francesco Tenore,et al.  An embedded controller for a 7-degree of freedom prosthetic arm , 2008, 2008 30th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[6]  Marco Platzner,et al.  FPGA-based acceleration of high density myoelectric signal processing , 2015, 2015 International Conference on ReConFigurable Computing and FPGAs (ReConFig).

[7]  C. Light,et al.  Establishing a standardized clinical assessment tool of pathologic and prosthetic hand function: normative data, reliability, and validity. , 2002, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[8]  L. Resnik,et al.  Development and evaluation of the activities measure for upper limb amputees. , 2013, Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation.

[9]  Kevin B. Englehart,et al.  A robust, real-time control scheme for multifunction myoelectric control , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[10]  Dario Farina,et al.  A state-based, proportional myoelectric control method: online validation and comparison with the clinical state-of-the-art , 2014, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[11]  Max Ortiz-Catalan,et al.  BioPatRec: A modular research platform for the control of artificial limbs based on pattern recognition algorithms , 2013, Source Code for Biology and Medicine.

[12]  Dario Farina,et al.  The Extraction of Neural Information from the Surface EMG for the Control of Upper-Limb Prostheses: Emerging Avenues and Challenges , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[13]  F. Finley,et al.  Pattern-recognition arm prosthesis: a historical perspective-a final report. , 1978, Bulletin of prosthetics research.

[14]  Virginia Wright,et al.  Prosthetic Outcome Measures for Use With Upper Limb Amputees: A Systematic Review of the Peer-Reviewed Literature, 1970 to 2009 , 2009 .

[15]  A. Eliasson,et al.  Assessment of capacity for myoelectric control: a new Rasch-built measure of prosthetic hand control. , 2005, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[16]  Christian Cipriani,et al.  Dexterous Control of a Prosthetic Hand Using Fine-Wire Intramuscular Electrodes in Targeted Extrinsic Muscles , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[17]  Max Ortiz-Catalan,et al.  An osseointegrated human-machine gateway for long-term sensory feedback and motor control of artificial limbs , 2014, Science Translational Medicine.

[18]  D Graupe,et al.  A multifunctional prosthesis control system based on time series identification of EMG signals using microprocessors. , 1977, Bulletin of prosthetics research.

[19]  P. Herberts,et al.  Hand prosthesis control via myoelectric patterns. , 1973, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[20]  K. Englehart,et al.  Resolving the Limb Position Effect in Myoelectric Pattern Recognition , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[21]  Taylor Dr,et al.  Pattern-recognition arm prosthesis: a historical perspective-a final report. , 1978 .

[22]  Enzo Mastinu,et al.  Embedded System for Prosthetic Control Using Implanted Neuromuscular Interfaces Accessed Via an Osseointegrated Implant , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Circuits and Systems.

[23]  R.N. Scott,et al.  A new strategy for multifunction myoelectric control , 1993, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[24]  Cosimo Della Santina,et al.  Preliminary results toward a naturally controlled multi-synergistic prosthetic hand , 2017, 2017 International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR).

[25]  Helen Y N Lindner,et al.  Test-retest reliability and rater agreements of assessment of capacity for myoelectric control version 2.0. , 2014, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[26]  Dario Farina,et al.  Translating Research on Myoelectric Control into Clinics—Are the Performance Assessment Methods Adequate? , 2017, Front. Neurorobot..

[27]  Peter J. Kyberd,et al.  Bridging the gap between robotic technology and health care , 2014, Biomed. Signal Process. Control..

[28]  Luca Benini,et al.  A Prosthetic Hand Body Area Controller Based on Efficient Pattern Recognition Control Strategies , 2017, Sensors.

[29]  Max Ortiz-Catalan,et al.  Offline accuracy: A potentially misleading metric in myoelectric pattern recognition for prosthetic control , 2015, 2015 37th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC).

[30]  Todd R Farrell,et al.  Determining delay created by multifunctional prosthesis controllers. , 2011, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[31]  M. J. Highsmith,et al.  Differences in myoelectric and body-powered upper-limb prostheses: Systematic literature review. , 2015, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[32]  Linda Resnik,et al.  Systematic Review of Measures of Impairment and Activity Limitation for Persons With Upper Limb Trauma and Amputation. , 2017, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.