Eroding the Clientelist Monopoly: The Subnational Left Turn and Conservative Rule in Northeastern Brazil

Well-financed opposition parties can exert their organizational strength to undercut the territorial advantages of political machines and clientele networks. In the first decade of the twenty-first century, leftist parties in Brazil’s Northeast region brought conservative dominance to an end. The Workers’ Party (Partido dos Trabalhadores, PT) led this shift, not only garnering regional majorities in presidential elections but also winning multiple governorships and increasing its share of federal and state legislative seats in the region. In contrast to arguments attributing recent electoral shifts in the Northeast to civil society, aggregate growth, and conditional cash transfers, we argue that the territorial expansion of the PT organization played a central role. A spike in party finances between 2001 and 2003 enabled the PT, for the first time, to establish party offices in northeastern municipalities from the top down. Drawing from underutilized data and sources, we show that the PT leadership eroded conservatives’ monopoly on rural territory in the Northeast by strategically targeting hundreds of conservative-dominated municipalities and investing resources to stimulate the formation of local offices. The study demonstrates that this top-down territorial targeting produced considerable electoral gains for PT candidates across federal and state races.

[1]  B. V. Dyck Why Party Organization Still Matters: The Workers' Party in Northeastern Brazil , 2014 .

[2]  David J. Samuels,et al.  Crafting Mass Partisanship at the Grass Roots , 2014, British Journal of Political Science.

[3]  B. Philip The Paradox of Adversity: New Left Party Survival and Collapse in Latin America , 2014 .

[4]  Alfred P. Montero Brazil: Reversal of Fortune , 2014 .

[5]  Julieta Suárez Cao Boundary Control: Subnational Authoritarianism in Federal Democracies , 2014 .

[6]  J. Luna,et al.  The Resilience of the Latin American Right , 2014 .

[7]  A. A. Ruiz,et al.  After Neoliberalism? the Left and Economic Reforms in Latin America , 2013 .

[8]  E. Gibson Boundary Control: Subnational Authoritarianism in Federal Democracies , 2013 .

[9]  Karen L. Remmer The Rise of Leftist– Populist Governance in Latin America , 2012 .

[10]  Gustavo Flores-Macías After Neoliberalism?: The Left and Economic Reforms in Latin America , 2012 .

[11]  Alfred P. Montero A Reversal of Political Fortune: The Transitional Dynamics of Conservative Rule in the Brazilian Northeast , 2012, Latin American Politics and Society.

[12]  André Borges The Political Consequences of Center-Led Redistribution in Brazilian Federalism: The Fall of Subnational Party Machines , 2012 .

[13]  Kenneth M. Roberts,et al.  The Resurgence of the Latin American Left , 2011 .

[14]  O. E. D. Amaral Ainda conectado: o PT e seus vínculos com a sociedade , 2011 .

[15]  A. Singer A segunda alma do partido dos trabalhadores , 2010 .

[16]  Lucio Rennó,et al.  As bases do Lulismo: a volta do personalismo, realinhamento ideológico ou não alinhamento? , 2010 .

[17]  W. Hunter The Transformation of the Workers' Party in Brazil, 1989-2009 , 2010 .

[18]  Simeon Nichter,et al.  Varieties of Clientelism: Machine Politics During Elections , 2010 .

[19]  Agustina Giraudy The Politics of Subnational Undemocratic Regime Reproduction in Argentina and Mexico , 2010 .

[20]  Alfred P. Montero No Country for Leftists? Clientelist Continuity and the 2006 Vote in the Brazilian Northeast , 2010 .

[21]  C. Gervasoni A Rentier Theory of Subnational Regimes: Fiscal Federalism, Democracy, and Authoritarianism in the Argentine Provinces , 2010 .

[22]  G. Venturi PT 30 anos: crescimento e mudanças na preferência partidária. Impacto nas eleições de 2010 , 2010 .

[23]  W. Hunter The Transformation of the Workers' Party in Brazil, 1989–2009: Striving for the Presidency: From Opposition to Government , 2010 .

[24]  Kurt Weyland,et al.  Leftist Governments in Latin America: Successes and Shortcomings , 2010 .

[25]  John D. French,et al.  The Workers ' Party and Democratization in Brazil , 2010 .

[26]  Simeon Nichter Declared Choice: Citizen Strategies and Dual Commitment Problems in Clientelism , 2009 .

[27]  T. Fenwick Avoiding Governors: The Success of Bolsa Família , 2009 .

[28]  B. Puchalska Economic Autonomy and Democracy : Hybrid Regimes in Russia and Kyrgyzstan , 2009 .

[29]  A. Singer Raízes sociais e ideológicas do lulismo , 2009 .

[30]  G. Soares,et al.  Dois Lulas: a geografia eleitoral da reeleição (explorando conceitos, métodos e técnicas de análise geoespacial) , 2008 .

[31]  David J. Samuels A evolução do petismo (2002-2008) , 2008 .

[32]  P. Ribeiro From Trade Unions to the Government: The National Organization of the Brazilian Workers’ Party from 1980 to 2005 (Dos Sindicatos ao Governo: A Organização Nacional do PT de 1980 a 2005) , 2008 .

[33]  Kenneth M. Roberts The Mobilization of Opposition to Economic Liberalization , 2008 .

[34]  Cesar Zucco,et al.  The President's ‘New’ Constituency: Lula and the Pragmatic Vote in Brazil's 2006 Presidential Elections* , 2008, Journal of Latin American Studies.

[35]  Steven I. Wilkinson,et al.  Patrons, Clients and Policies: Patterns of Democratic Accountability and Political Competition , 2007 .

[36]  Beatriz Magaloni,et al.  Patrons, Clients, and Policies: Clientelism and portfolio diversification: a model of electoral investment with applications to Mexico , 2007 .

[37]  W. Hunter,et al.  Rewarding Lula: Executive Power, Social Policy, and the Brazilian Elections of 2006 , 2007, Latin American Politics and Society.

[38]  S. Stokes,et al.  Patrons, Clients, and Policies: Monopoly and monitoring: an approach to political clientelism , 2007 .

[39]  Jorge G. Castańeda Latin America's Left Turn , 2006 .

[40]  B. Ames,et al.  Social Context and Campaign Volatility in New Democracies: Networks and Neighborhoods in Brazil's 2002 Elections , 2006 .

[41]  S. Stokes,et al.  6 Monopoly and Monitoring : an approach to political clientelism , 2006 .

[42]  H. Hale Why Not Parties in Russia?: Democracy, Federalism, and the State , 2005 .

[43]  E. Gibson Boundary Control: Subnational Authoritarianism in Democratic Countries , 2005 .

[44]  T. Karl CDDRL WORKING PAPERS , 2005 .

[45]  David J. Samuels From Socialism to Social Democracy , 2004 .

[46]  W. Hunter The Deadlock of Democracy in Brazil: Interests, Identities, and Institutions in Comparative Politics. By Barry Ames. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2001. 352p. $59.50 , 2003, Perspectives on Politics.

[47]  A. Lacerda O PT e a Unidade Partidária como Problema , 2002 .

[48]  Jorge Zaverucha The Political Right in Postauthoritarian Brazil: Elites, Institutions, and Democratization. By Timothy J. Power. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2000. 284p. $55.00 cloth, $19.95 paper. , 2001, American Political Science Review.

[49]  B. Ames The Deadlock of Democracy in Brazil , 2001 .

[50]  Jason Wittenberg,et al.  Making the Most Of Statistical Analyses: Improving Interpretation and Presentation , 2000 .

[51]  Kevin J. Middlebrook Conservative parties, the right, and democracy in Latin America , 2000 .

[52]  S. Mainwaring Rethinking Party Systems in the Third Wave of Democratization: The Case of Brazil , 1999 .

[53]  William R. Nylen Reconstructing the Workers' Party (PT): Lessons from North‐Eastern Brazil , 1997 .

[54]  Douglas A. Chalmers,et al.  The new politics of inequality in Latin America : rethinking participation and representation , 1997 .

[55]  M. Keck The Workers` Party and Democratization in Brazil , 1992 .

[56]  Rachel Meneguello PT : a formação de um partido, 1979-1982 , 1989 .

[57]  James C. Scott Corruption, Machine Politics, and Political Change , 1969, American Political Science Review.