[Relationship between image quality and cross-sectional area of phantom in three-dimensional positron emission tomography scan].
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Chisato Kondo,et al. Comparison of Imaging Protocols for 18F-FDG PET/CT in Overweight Patients: Optimizing Scan Duration Versus Administered Dose , 2009, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.
[2] R. Wahl,et al. Impact of body habitus on quantitative and qualitative image quality in whole-body FDG-PET , 2002, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.
[3] D. Mankoff,et al. Impact of Time-of-Flight PET on Whole-Body Oncologic Studies: A Human Observer Lesion Detection and Localization Study , 2011, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.
[4] M. Senda,et al. Japanese guideline for the oncology FDG-PET/CT data acquisition protocol: synopsis of Version 1.0 , 2010, Annals of nuclear medicine.
[5] Akio Nagaki*,et al. Patient Weight–Based Acquisition Protocols to Optimize18F-FDG PET/CT Image Quality , 2011, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology.
[6] Osman Ratib,et al. Optimizing imaging protocols for overweight and obese patients: a lutetium orthosilicate PET/CT study. , 2005, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.
[7] Christian Vanhove,et al. Optimal dose of 18F-FDG required for whole-body PET using an LSO PET camera , 2003, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.
[8] Roberta Matheoud,et al. Performance characteristics obtained for a new 3-dimensional lutetium oxyorthosilicate-based whole-body PET/CT scanner with the National Electrical Manufacturers Association NU 2-2001 standard. , 2005, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.