A Vortex Identification Method Based on Extreme Learning Machine

Vortex identification and visualization are important means to understand the underlying physical mechanism of the flow field. Local vortex identification methods need to combine with the manual selection of the appropriate threshold, which leads to poor robustness. Global vortex identification methods are of high computational complexity and time-consuming. Machine learning methods are related to the size and shape of the flow field, which are weak in versatility and scalability. It cannot be extended and is suitable for flow fields of different sizes. Recently, proposed deep learning methods have long network training time and high computational complexity. Aiming at the above problems, we present a novel vortex identification method based on the Convolutional Neural Networks-Extreme Learning Machine (CNN-ELM). This method transforms the vortex identification problem into a binary classification problem, and can quickly, objectively, and robustly identify vortices from the flow field. A large number of experiments prove the effectiveness of our method, which can improve or supplement the shortcomings of existing methods.

[1]  Holger Theisel,et al.  The State of the Art in Vortex Extraction , 2018, Comput. Graph. Forum.

[2]  J. Hunt Vorticity and vortex dynamics in complex turbulent flows , 1987 .

[3]  George Haller,et al.  Efficient computation of null geodesics with applications to coherent vortex detection , 2016, Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[4]  Yueqing Wang,et al.  A rapid vortex identification method using fully convolutional segmentation network , 2020, Vis. Comput..

[5]  Hongming Zhou,et al.  Extreme Learning Machine for Regression and Multiclass Classification , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B (Cybernetics).

[6]  Raghu Machiraju,et al.  Boosting Techniques for Physics‐Based Vortex Detection , 2014, Comput. Graph. Forum.

[7]  Cheng Wu,et al.  Semi-Supervised and Unsupervised Extreme Learning Machines , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics.

[8]  G. Haller,et al.  Defining coherent vortices objectively from the vorticity , 2015, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[9]  George Haller,et al.  Objective Eulerian coherent structures. , 2015, Chaos.

[10]  R. Adrian,et al.  On the relationships between local vortex identification schemes , 2005, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[11]  Hans-Georg Pagendarm,et al.  Selective visualization of vortices in hydrodynamic flows , 1998 .

[12]  Yoav Freund,et al.  A decision-theoretic generalization of on-line learning and an application to boosting , 1997, EuroCOLT.

[13]  Patrice Y. Simard,et al.  Best practices for convolutional neural networks applied to visual document analysis , 2003, Seventh International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition, 2003. Proceedings..

[14]  Jie Liu,et al.  A CNN-based vortex identification method , 2018, J. Vis..

[15]  Ribana Roscher,et al.  Ocean Eddy Identification and Tracking Using Neural Networks , 2018, IGARSS 2018 - 2018 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium.

[16]  MING JIANG,et al.  Detection and Visualization of Vortices , 2005, The Visualization Handbook.

[17]  Jinhee Jeong,et al.  On the identification of a vortex , 1995, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[18]  D. Küchemann,et al.  Report on the I.U.T.A.M. symposium on concentrated vortex motions in fluids , 1965, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[19]  Benoît Frénay,et al.  Feature selection for nonlinear models with extreme learning machines , 2013, Neurocomputing.

[20]  Raghu Machiraju,et al.  An uncertainty-driven approach to vortex analysis using oracle consensus and spatial proximity , 2015, 2015 IEEE Pacific Visualization Symposium (PacificVis).

[21]  Chaoqun Liu,et al.  New omega vortex identification method , 2016 .

[22]  Yantao Yang,et al.  Axial stretching and vortex definition , 2005 .

[23]  M. S. Chong,et al.  A general classification of three-dimensional flow fields , 1990 .