List-strength Effect: Ii. Theoretical Mechanisms

Ratcliff, Clark, and Shiffrin (1990) examined the list-strength effect: the effect of strengthening (or weakening) some list items upon memory for other list items. The list-strength effect was missing or negative in recognition, missing or positive in cued recall, and large and positive in free recall. We show that a large number of current models fail to predict these findings. A variant of the SAM model of Gillund and Shiffrin (1984), involving a differentiation hypothesis, can handle the data. A variant of MINERVA 2 (Hintzman, 1986, 1988) comes close but has some problems. Successful variants of a variety of composite and network models were not found (e.g., Ackley, Hinton, & Sejnowski, 1985; Anderson, 1972, 1973; Metcalfe Eich, 1982; Murdock, 1982; Pike, 1984). The results suggest constraints on the future development of such models.

[1]  E. Gibson.  A systematic application of the concepts of generalization and differentiation to verbal learning , 1940 .

[2]  J. Gibson,et al.  Perceptual learning; differentiation or enrichment? , 1955, Psychological review.

[3]  E. Saltz.  Response pretraining: differentiation or availability? , 1961, Journal of experimental psychology.

[4]  E. Saltz,et al.  Compound stimuli in verbal learning: cognitive and sensory differentiation versus stimulus selection. , 1963, Journal of experimental psychology.

[5]  R M Shiffrin,et al.  Forgetting: Trace Erosion or Retrieval Failure? , 1970, Science.

[6]  John R. Anderson,et al.  RECOGNITION AND RETRIEVAL PROCESSES IN FREE RECALL , 1972 .

[7]  James A. Anderson,et al.  A simple neural network generating an interactive memory , 1972 .

[8]  James A. Anderson,et al.  A theory for the recognition of items from short memorized lists , 1973 .

[9]  M. Glanzer,et al.  Analysis of the word-frequency effect in recognition memory , 1976 .

[10]  Stephen A. Ritz,et al.  Distinctive features, categorical perception, and probability learning: some applications of a neural model , 1977 .

[11]  Richard M. Shiffrin,et al.  SAM: A theory of probabilistic search in associative memory. , 1980 .

[12]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory , 1980 .

[13]  R. Shiffrin,et al.  Search of associative memory. , 1981 .

[14]  Janet Metcalfe,et al.  An encoding and retrieval model of single-trial free recall , 1981 .

[15]  Janet Metcalfe,et al.  A composite holographic associative recall model , 1982 .

[16]  B. Murdock.  A Theory for the Storage and Retrieval of Item and Associative Information. , 1982 .

[17]  M Glanzer,et al.  An analysis of interference in recognition memory , 1983, Memory & cognition.

[18]  R. Shiffrin,et al.  A retrieval model for both recognition and recall. , 1984, Psychological review.

[19]  Ray Pike,et al.  Comparison of convolution and matrix distributed memory systems for associative recall and recognition , 1984 .

[20]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  A Learning Algorithm for Boltzmann Machines , 1985, Cogn. Sci..

[21]  J. Eich.  Levels of processing, encoding specificity, elaboration, and CHARM. , 1985, Psychological review.

[22]  Douglas L. Hintzman,et al.  "Schema Abstraction" in a Multiple-Trace Memory Model , 1986 .

[23]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Learning internal representations by error propagation , 1986 .

[24]  R M Shiffrin,et al.  Retrieval strategies in recall of natural categories and categorized lists. , 1986, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[25]  James L. McClelland,et al.  James L. McClelland, David Rumelhart and the PDP Research Group, Parallel distributed processing: explorations in the microstructure of cognition . Vol. 1. Foundations . Vol. 2. Psychological and biological models . Cambridge MA: M.I.T. Press, 1987. , 1989, Journal of Child Language.

[26]  R. Nosofsky.  Attention and learning processes in the identification and categorization of integral stimuli. , 1987, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[27]  Douglas L. Hintzman,et al.  Judgments of frequency and recognition memory in a multiple-trace memory model. , 1988 .

[28]  Steven M. Smith.  Environmental context—dependent memory. , 1988 .

[29]  B. Murdock,et al.  The replacement effect: Repeating some items while replacing others , 1988, Memory & cognition.

[30]  M. Humphreys,et al.  Different Ways to Cue a Coherent Memory System: A Theory for Episodic, Semantic, and Procedural Tasks. , 1989 .

[31]  Robert A. Bjork,et al.  On the puzzling relationship between environmental context and human memory. , 1989 .

[32]  Ray Pike,et al.  Global matching: A comparison of the SAM, Minerva II, Matrix, and TODAM models. , 1989 .

[33]  R. Shiffrin,et al.  List-strength effect: I. Data and discussion. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[34]  G. Davies,et al.  Memory in context : context in memory , 1990 .

[35]  R Ratcliff,et al.  Connectionist models of recognition memory: constraints imposed by learning and forgetting functions. , 1990, Psychological review.

[36]  R. Shiffrin,et al.  List-strength effect: I. Data and discussion. , 1990 .