Another look at shape variation in the distal femur of Australopithecus afarensis: implications for taxonomic and functional diversity at Hadar.

Previous studies have recognized two patterns of distal femoral morphology among the specimens from Hadar (Ethiopia) assigned to Australopithecus afarensis. Size and shape differences between the well-preserved large (AL 333-4) and small (AL 129-1a) distal femora have been used to invoke both taxonomic and functional differences within the A. afarensis hypodigm. Nevertheless, prior studies have not analyzed these specimens in a multivariate context, nor have they compared the pattern of shape differences between the fossils to patterns of sexual dimorphism among extant taxa (i.e., the manner in which males and females differ). This study reexamines morphometric differences between the above specimens in light of observed levels of variation and patterns of sexual dimorphism among extant hominoids. Eight extant reference populations were sampled to provide a standard by which to consider size and shape differences between the fossils. Samples include three populations of modern humans, two subspecies of Pan troglodytes, three subspecies of Gorilla gorilla, Pan paniscus, and Pongo pygmaeus. Using size ratios and scale-free "shape" data (both derived from 2-D coordinate landmarks), size and shape differences between the fossils were evaluated against variation within each reference population using an exact randomization procedure. Growth Difference Matrix Analysis (GDMA) was used to test whether the pattern of morphological differences between the fossils differs significantly from patterns of sexual dimorphism observed among the ten extant groups. Overall morphometric affinities of the fossils to extant taxa were explored using canonical variates analysis (CVA). Results of the randomization tests indicate that the size difference between the Hadar femora can be easily accommodated within most hominoid taxa at the subspecific level (though not within single-sex samples). In addition, the magnitude of shape differences between the fossils can be commonly sampled even within most single-sex samples of a single hominoid subspecies. The pattern of morphological differences between the fossils does not differ statistically from any average pattern of femoral shape dimorphism observed among living hominoids. Moreover, contrary to prior claims, and despite a size disparity between the fossils greater than is typically observed within some chimpanzee and human populations, the two Hadar fossils appear to be much more similar to one another in overall shape than either specimen is to any extant hominoid group.

[1]  B. Wood Origin and evolution of the genus Homo , 1992, Nature.

[2]  Lawrence B. Martin,et al.  Species, Species Concepts and Primate Evolution , 1993, Advances in Primatology.

[3]  J. Kent The Complex Bingham Distribution and Shape Analysis , 1994 .

[4]  P. O'higgins,et al.  Facial growth in Cercocebus torquatus: an application of three‐dimensional geometric morphometric techniques to the study of morphological variation , 1998, Journal of anatomy.

[5]  B. Senut Long bones of the primate upper limb: Monomorphic or dimorphic? , 1986 .

[6]  J. T. Stern,et al.  The locomotor anatomy of Australopithecus afarensis. , 1983, American journal of physical anthropology.

[7]  E. Delson,et al.  Ancestors: The Hard Evidence , 1988 .

[8]  H. Mchenry Size variation in the postcranium ofAustralopithecus afarensis and extant species of hominoidea , 1986 .

[9]  M A Spencer,et al.  Technical note: video-based three-dimensional morphometrics. , 1995, American journal of physical anthropology.

[10]  K. Mardia,et al.  Statistical Shape Analysis , 1998 .

[11]  A. Walker,et al.  Species Discrimination in Proconsul from Rusinga and Mfangano Islands, Kenya , 1993 .

[12]  Y. Rak,et al.  The first skull and other new discoveries of Australopithecus afarensis at Hadar, Ethiopia , 1994, Nature.

[13]  R. Corruccini,et al.  Primate Evolutionary Biology , 1981, Proceedings in Life Sciences.

[14]  R. Leakey,et al.  The hominids of East Turkana. , 1978, Scientific American.

[15]  Chris Stringer,et al.  Aspects of human evolution , 1981 .

[16]  J. Wanner Variations in the anterior patellar groove of the human femur. , 1977, American journal of physical anthropology.

[17]  J T Richtsmeier,et al.  A COORDINATE‐FREE APPROACH TO THE ANALYSIS OF GROWTH PATTERNS: MODELS AND THEORETICAL CONSIDERATIONS , 1993, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[18]  C. Tardieu,et al.  Morpho-Functional Analysis of the Articular Surfaces of the Knee-Joint in Primates , 1981 .

[19]  D. Johanson,et al.  Temporal trends and metric variation in the mandibles and dentition of Australopithecus afarensis. , 2000, Journal of human evolution.

[20]  F. Rohlf,et al.  Extensions of the Procrustes Method for the Optimal Superimposition of Landmarks , 1990 .

[21]  Jacob Cohen,et al.  THINGS I HAVE LEARNED (SO FAR) , 1990 .

[22]  B. Richmond,et al.  Randomization procedures and sexual dimorphism in Australopithecus afarensis , 1996 .

[23]  M. Pickford,et al.  Sexual dimorphism in living and fossil primates , 1986 .

[24]  H. Mchenry Sexual dimorphism inAustralopithecus afarensis , 1991 .

[25]  T D White,et al.  A systematic assessment of early African hominids. , 1979, Science.

[26]  W. Jungers,et al.  Morphometric variation in Plio-Pleistocene hominid distal humeri. , 1996, American journal of physical anthropology.

[27]  B. Wood,et al.  EARLY HOMINID PHYLOGENY , 1987 .

[28]  R. L. Susman,et al.  Hominid evolution past, present and future , 1988 .

[29]  F. Rohlf Shape Statistics: Procrustes Superimpositions and Tangent Spaces , 1999 .

[30]  J. Gower Generalized procrustes analysis , 1975 .

[31]  T. White,et al.  A new species of the genus Australopithecus (Primates: Hominidae) from the Pliocene of eastern Africa , 1978 .

[32]  Christine Tardieu,et al.  L'articulation du genou : analyse morpho-fonctionnelle chez les primates et les hominidés fossiles , 1983 .

[33]  Donald C. Johanson,et al.  Hominid upper limb bones recovered from the Hadar formation: 1974–1977 collections , 1982 .

[34]  B. Richmond,et al.  Size variation and sexual dimorphism in Australopithecus afarensis and living hominoids , 1995 .

[35]  J. T. Stern,et al.  Arboreality and bipedality in the Hadar hominids. , 1984, Folia primatologica; international journal of primatology.

[36]  T. M. Cole,et al.  An odontometric assessment of variability inAustralopithecus afarensis , 1987 .