Voice assimilation in French obstruents: Categorical or gradient?

This work contributes to the issue of categoricity versus gradiency in natural assimilations. We focused on voice-assimilation in French and started from the assumption that the main cue to obstruent voicing is glottal pulsing. We quantified glottal pulsing continuously with a single acoustic measure — the proportion in duration of voiced portion(s) within a consonant — which we call v-ratio. We used a large corpus of French radio and television speech to compute v-ratios for all the obstruents appearing in word-final to word-initial obstruent contacts. The results were analyzed in terms of v-ratio distributions, which were compared with theoretical distributions predicted by two contrasted hypotheses on the mechanisms of assimilation: categorical switch versus v-ratio shift. The comparisons strongly suggested that, although voicing itself can be incomplete, voice assimilation is essentially categorical in terms of v-ratio. We discuss this result in the light of recent perceptual data showing sensitivity to extremely subtle acoustic differences: secondary cues to voicing do not seem to follow the same pattern of categoricity as glottal pulsing.

[1]  C. Browman,et al.  Articulatory Phonology: An Overview , 1992, Phonetica.

[2]  Louis Goldstein,et al.  Gestural specification using dynamically-defined articulatory structures , 1990 .

[3]  Laura C. Dilley,et al.  A study of regressive place assimilation in spontaneous speech and its implications for spoken word recognition. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  Alexandre Allauzen,et al.  Where are we in transcribing French broadcast news? , 2005, INTERSPEECH.

[5]  W. Jansen Laryngeal contrast and phonetic voicing : a laboratory phonology approach to English, Hungarian, and Dutch , 2004 .

[6]  Lori Lamel,et al.  Pronunciation variants across system configuration, language and speaking style , 1999, Speech Commun..

[7]  D. Gow Does English coronal place assimilation create lexical ambiguity , 2002 .

[8]  S. Ohman Coarticulation in VCV utterances: spectrographic measurements. , 1966, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  Oliver Niebuhr,et al.  On Place Assimilation in French Sibilant Sequences , 2008 .

[10]  D. Gow Assimilation and Anticipation in Continuous Spoken Word Recognition , 2001 .

[11]  Pierre A. Hallé,et al.  Perception of initial obstruent voicing is influenced by gestural organization , 2010, J. Phonetics.

[12]  William D. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  Phonological variation and inference in lexical access. , 1996 .

[13]  Henning Reetz,et al.  Distinctive features: Phonological underspecification in representation and processing , 2010, J. Phonetics.

[14]  Paul Boersma,et al.  Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer , 2002 .

[15]  Katherine D. Kinzler,et al.  Phonological knowledge in compensation for native and non-native assimilation , 2009 .

[16]  Natalie D. Snoeren,et al.  The impact of strong assimilation on the perception of connected speech. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[17]  W. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  Phonological variation and inference in lexical access. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[18]  Pierre A. Hallé,et al.  A voice for the voiceless: Production and perception of assimilated stops in French , 2006, J. Phonetics.

[19]  S. Blumstein,et al.  Cascading activation from phonological planning to articulatory processes: Evidence from tongue twisters , 2006 .

[20]  H. Magen The extent of vowel-to-vowel coarticulation in English and Japanese , 1997 .

[21]  Dawn G. Blasko,et al.  Do the Beginnings of Spoken Words Have a Special Status in Auditory Word Recognition , 1993 .

[22]  Pierre A. Hallé,et al.  On the role of regular phonological variation in lexical access: Evidence from voice assimilation in French , 2008, Cognition.

[23]  Maurice Grammont,et al.  Traité de phonétique , 1939 .

[24]  W. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  Lexical Ambiguity Resolution and Spoken Word Recognition: Bridging the Gap , 2001 .

[25]  Hallé,et al.  VOICING ASSIMILATION IN JOURNALISTIC SPEECH , 2007 .

[26]  M. Burton,et al.  A phonetic analysis of voicing assimilation in Russian , 1997 .

[27]  A. Martinet Économie des changements phonétiques : traité de phonologie diachronique , 1957 .

[28]  P. Fouché Traité de prononciation française , 1956 .

[29]  David W. Gow,et al.  A cross-linguistic examination of assimilation context effects , 2004 .

[30]  C A Fowler,et al.  Coordination and Coarticulation in Speech Production , 1993, Language and speech.

[31]  Edward Flemming Phonetic Detail in Phonology : Evidence from assimilation and coarticulation , 2006 .

[32]  Niels O. Schiller,et al.  Phonological encoding in speech production , 2019, ExLing.

[33]  George N. Clements,et al.  The geometry of phonological features , 1985, Phonology Yearbook.

[34]  Y Xu,et al.  Production and perception of coarticulated tones. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[35]  Dominic W. Massaro,et al.  Categorical or continuous speech perception: A new test , 1983, Speech Commun..