EcoSol-agroecology networks respond to the Covid-19 crisis: building an economy of proximity in Brazil’s Baixada Santista region

ABSTRACT In 2020–2021 the Covid-19 crisis worsened the harms from the hegemonic agribusiness model, while also providing opportunities for alternatives. Since long before the crisis, Latin American civil society networks had been building an agroecology-based solidarity economy (here EcoSol-agroecology for short). These networks have linked agroecological production methods with collective marketing through short food-supply chains (circuitos curtos), establishing closer relationships with consumers. Such initiatives have been expanded, despite adverse government policies and Covid-19 obstacles. This expansion has been widely understood as strengthening social proximities. As the analytical contribution here, EcoSol-agroecology networks build an ‘economy of proximity’, based on proximate purposes such as mutual aid, democratic self-management, women's leadership, food security and biodiverse resource conservation. These solidaristic purposes help to activate other proximities (geographical, organisational, institutional, and cultural), while also linking them. Collective capacities have developed those proximities in context-specific ways. This strategic perspective has informed EcoSol-agroecology networks in Brazil's Baixada Santista region, the site of grassroots voices in this case study. Diverse contributions have been integrated into a composite culture as a symbolic site of belonging. As global elites seek to restore the hegemonic agri-food system after the Covid-19 pandemic, a different future depends on building the social proximities of EcoSol-agroecology.

[1]  C. Lamine,et al.  Ruptures in the agroecological transitions: institutional change and policy dismantling in Brazil , 2022, The Journal of Peasant Studies.

[2]  Ingrid Gabriella da H. Carriço,et al.  Comida de verdade no campo e na cidade: uma abordagem acerca das plantas alimentícias não convencionais (PANC) da Mata Atlântica , 2022 .

[3]  J. Clapp,et al.  This food crisis is different: COVID-19 and the fragility of the neoliberal food security order , 2020 .

[4]  J. van der Ploeg From biomedical to politico-economic crisis: the food system in times of Covid-19 , 2020 .

[5]  D. Bandoni,et al.  Programa Nacional de Alimentação Escolar: estratégias para enfrentar a insegurança alimentar durante e após a COVID-19 , 2020, Revista de Administração Pública.

[6]  S. Sauer Interview with João Pedro Stédile, national leader of the MST – Brazil , 2020, Journal of Peasant Studies.

[7]  C. Nicholls,et al.  Agroecology and the reconstruction of a post-COVID-19 agriculture , 2020 .

[8]  Maria Thaís Firmino da Silva A segurança e a soberania alimentares: conceitos e possibilidades de combate à fome no Brasil , 2020, Configurações.

[9]  L. F. Chaves,et al.  COVID-19 and Circuits of Capital , 2020 .

[10]  E. Sabourin,et al.  The Dismantling of Family Farming Policies in Brazil and Argentina , 2020, International Review of Public Policy.

[11]  L. Levidow,et al.  Agroecological practices as territorial development: an analytical schema from Brazilian case studies , 2019, The Journal of Peasant Studies.

[12]  E. Sabourin,et al.  CONSTRUÇÃO DE POLÍTICAS ESTADUAIS DE AGROECOLOGIA E PRODUÇÃO ORGÂNICA NO BRASIL: avanços, obstáculos e efeitos das dinâmicas subnacionais , 2019 .

[13]  C. Grisa,et al.  Narrative Disputes over Family-Farming Public Policies in Brazil: Conservative Attacks and Restricted Countermovements , 2019, Latin American Research Review.

[14]  E. Sabourin,et al.  A trajetória brasileira de construção de políticas públicas para a agroecologia , 2019, Redes.

[15]  N. Silva,et al.  Quadro teórico de apoio à atuação de extensionistas para o fortalecimento da economia solidária , 2018 .

[16]  B. Ferguson,et al.  Bringing agroecology to scale: key drivers and emblematic cases , 2018 .

[17]  Isabelle Hillenkamp,et al.  Cruzando os caminhos da economia solidária e do feminismo: Passos para uma convergência necessária , 2019 .

[18]  P. Rosset,et al.  Agroecology: Science and Politics , 2017 .

[19]  J. Vandermeer Big Farms Make Big Flu: Dispatches on Infectious Disease, Agribusiness, and the Nature of Science. By Rob Wallace. New York: Monthly Review Press. $24.00 (paper). 456 p.; ill.; index. ISBN: 978-1-5836758-9-2. 2016. , 2017 .

[20]  P. Petersen,et al.  La experiencia brasileña de construcción de políticas públicas en favor de la Agroecología , 2017 .

[21]  F. Delgado,et al.  Ciencias, diálogo de saberes y transdisciplinariedad. Aportes teórico metodológicos para la sustentabilidad alimentaria y del desarrollo , 2016 .

[22]  L. Cabral,et al.  Brazil’s Agricultural Politics in Africa: More Food International and the Disputed Meanings of “Family Farming” , 2016 .

[23]  J. Godar,et al.  Development Conditions for Family Farming: Lessons From Brazil , 2015 .

[24]  Anthony Pahnke Institutionalizing economies of opposition: explaining and evaluating the success of the MST's cooperatives and agroecological repeasantization , 2015 .

[25]  B. Agarwal Food sovereignty, food security and democratic choice: critical contradictions, difficult conciliations , 2014 .

[26]  Isabelle Guérin,et al.  Economie solidaire et théories féministes: pistes pour une convergence nécessaire , 2014 .

[27]  Antonio M. Buainain,et al.  Family farming in Brazil: evolution between the 1996 and 2006 agricultural censuses , 2013 .

[28]  P. Petersen,et al.  Institutionalization of the Agroecological Approach in Brazil: Advances and Challenges , 2012 .

[29]  P. Rosset,et al.  Rural Social Movements and Agroecology: Context, Theory, and Process , 2012 .

[30]  J. D. Ploeg,et al.  Rural development through the construction of new, nested, markets: comparative perspectives from China, Brazil and the European Union , 2012 .

[31]  Câmara Interministerial de Segurança Alimentar e Nutricional Plano Nacional de Segurança Alimentar e Nutricional : 2012/2015 , 2011 .

[32]  M. Altieri,et al.  The agroecological revolution in Latin America: rescuing nature, ensuring food sovereignty and empowering peasants , 2011 .

[33]  E. Sabourin Sociedades e organizações camponesas. Uma leitura através da reciprocidade , 2011 .

[34]  J. D. Ploeg,et al.  Heterogeneidade, ator e estrutura: para a reconstituiçao do conceito de estrutura , 2011 .

[35]  Hassan Zaoul O homo situs e suas perspectivas paradigmáticas , 2010 .

[36]  Claudia Job Schmitt Economia solidária e agroecologia : convergências e desafios na construção de modos de vida sustentáveis , 2010 .

[37]  S. Leite,et al.  O Programa de Aquisição de Alimentos (PAA) em Perspectiva: Apontamentos e Questões para o Debate , 2010 .

[38]  Raj Patel,et al.  Food sovereignty , 2009 .

[39]  R. Patel,et al.  What does food sovereignty look like , 2009 .

[40]  C. Nicholls,et al.  Scaling up Agroecological Approaches for Food Sovereignty in Latin America , 2008 .

[41]  V. Carneiro,et al.  O movimento da economia solidária no Brasil: uma discussão sobre a possibilidade da unidade através da diversidade , 2008 .

[42]  Geoff Watts,et al.  The Monster at Our Door: The Global Threat of Avian Flu , 2005, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[43]  E. Contini,et al.  TRANSFORMAÇÕES DA AGRICULTURA BRASILEIRA E PESQUISA AGROPECUÁRIA , 2005 .

[44]  O. A. Teixeira,et al.  MODERNIZAÇÃO DA AGRICULTURA FAMILIAR E EXCLUSÃO SOCIAL: O DILEMA DAS POLÍTICAS AGRÍCOLAS , 2005 .

[45]  P. Singer Introdução à economia solidária , 2002 .

[46]  A. Souza,et al.  A economia solidária no Brasil : a autogestão como resposta ao desemprego , 2000 .

[47]  Richard B. Norgaard,et al.  AGROECOLOGIA “Bases científicas para una agricultura sustentable” , 1999 .