Sparse Activity Detection for Massive Connectivity in Cellular Networks: Multi-Cell Cooperation Vs Large-Scale Antenna Arrays

Sparse device activity detection for machine-type communications has attracted increasing attention in recent studies. However, most of the previous works focus on the single-cell case. This paper studies the impact of the inter-cell interference on the device activity detection problem with non-orthogonal signatures in multi-cell systems by employing the computationally efficient approximate message passing algorithm (AMP). Specifically, this paper studies the impact of the inter-cell interference by either treating it as noise or recovering it, showing that it is always beneficial to recover the interference at each base station (BS). Two network architectures, namely BSs with large antenna arrays and network with multi-cell cooperation, are compared in terms of their effectiveness in overcoming inter-cell interference. This paper provides an analytical characterization of probabilities of false alarm and missed detection. Simulation results show that large-scale antenna array is effective in improving the performance of all users whereas cooperation is effective in improving the performance of cell-edge users. In terms of the detection performance of the 95-percentile users, simulation results under a typical network setting show that having twice as many antennas provides almost the same benefit as multi-cell cooperation.

[1]  Sundeep Rangan,et al.  Generalized approximate message passing for estimation with random linear mixing , 2010, 2011 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory Proceedings.

[2]  Philip Schniter,et al.  Efficient High-Dimensional Inference in the Multiple Measurement Vector Problem , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[3]  Andrea Montanari,et al.  Message-passing algorithms for compressed sensing , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[4]  Wei Yu,et al.  Sparse Activity Detection for Massive Connectivity , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[5]  Carsten Bockelmann,et al.  Compressive Sensing Multi-User Detection for Multicarrier Systems in Sporadic Machine Type Communication , 2015, 2015 IEEE 81st Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC Spring).

[6]  Emil Björnson,et al.  A Random Access Protocol for Pilot Allocation in Crowded Massive MIMO Systems , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[7]  Xiao Xu,et al.  Active user detection and channel estimation in uplink CRAN systems , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC).

[8]  Xu Chen,et al.  Capacity of Gaussian Many-Access Channels , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[9]  Wei Yu,et al.  On the fundamental limits of massive connectivity , 2017, 2017 Information Theory and Applications Workshop (ITA).

[10]  Richard G. Baraniuk,et al.  Asymptotic Analysis of Complex LASSO via Complex Approximate Message Passing (CAMP) , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[11]  Zoran Utkovski,et al.  Random Access in C-RAN for User Activity Detection With Limited-Capacity Fronthaul , 2017, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.

[12]  Holger Boche,et al.  Sparse Signal Processing Concepts for Efficient 5G System Design , 2014, IEEE Access.

[13]  Jong Chul Ye,et al.  Belief propagation for joint sparse recovery , 2011, ArXiv.

[14]  Andrea Montanari,et al.  Graphical Models Concepts in Compressed Sensing , 2010, Compressed Sensing.

[15]  Wei Yu,et al.  Massive device connectivity with massive MIMO , 2017, 2017 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory (ISIT).