Information Sampling and Confidence Within Groups and Judge Advisor Systems

This study compared how the judge advisor system (JAS) and unstructured groups discuss common and unique information. Three differences between the two were measured for their effect on communication of information. These were responsibility for decision, consensus seeking, and equity of participation. Participants were given information about two drugs and had to decide which of the two to market. Half met in unstructured 3-person groups and made the decision as a group. The rest met in JASs whereby the judge discussed the information with each advisor separately and then made the decision individually. Advisors mentioned but did not repeat a higher proportion of unique information than group members. Judges felt more responsible for, reported putting more effort toward, and had higher confidence in the decision than did group members. There was more inequity of participation and consensus seeking in JASs compared to groups. Differences are discussed in light of results found on information exchange.

[1]  G. M. Wittenbaum,et al.  Mutual enhancement: Toward an understanding of the collective preference for shared information , 1999 .

[2]  S. Hinkle,et al.  Intragroup identification and intergroup differentiation: A multicomponent approach , 1989 .

[3]  R. Hastie,et al.  The common knowledge effect: Information sharing and group judgment. , 1993 .

[4]  Janet A. Sniezek,et al.  Groups under uncertainty: An examination of confidence in group decision making☆ , 1992 .

[5]  Francis J. Yammarino,et al.  Leadership: The multiple-level approaches , 1995 .

[6]  L. Ross,et al.  The overconfidence effect in social prediction. , 1990, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[7]  O. J. Harvey,et al.  Status and conformity to pressures in informal groups. , 1960, Journal of abnormal and social psychology.

[8]  Aaron M. Brower,et al.  What's Social about Social Cognition?: Research on Socially Shared Cognition in Small Groups , 1996 .

[9]  Rebecca A. Henry,et al.  Accuracy and confidence in group judgment , 1989 .

[10]  J. R. Larson,et al.  Leadership Style and the Discussion of Shared and Unshared Information in Decision-Making Groups , 1998 .

[11]  Janet A. Sniezek,et al.  Trust, Confidence, and Expertise in a Judge-Advisor System. , 2001, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[12]  Sherry K. Schneider,et al.  COMPUTER-MEDIATED COMMUNICATION AND SOCIAL INFORMATION: STATUS SALIENCE AND STATUS DIFFERENCES , 1995 .

[13]  G. Stasser,et al.  Expert role assignment and information sampling during collective recall and decision making. , 1995, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[14]  Holly Arrow,et al.  A Tripartite Model of Group Identification , 1999 .

[15]  I. Janis,et al.  Decision Making: A Psychological Analysis of Conflict, Choice, and Commitment , 1977 .

[16]  R. Tindale,et al.  ‘Social Sharedness’ as a Unifying Theme for Information Processing in Groups , 2000 .

[17]  G. Stasser,et al.  Effects of information load and percentage of shared information on the dissemination of unshared information during group discussion. , 1987 .

[18]  G. Stasser,et al.  Expert Roles and Information Exchange during Discussion: The Importance of Knowing Who Knows What , 1995 .

[19]  H. Guetzkow.  Unitizing and categorizing problems in coding qualitative data , 1950 .

[20]  Alain Van Hiel,et al.  Information Exchange in Context: Effects of Gender Composition of Group, Accountability, and Intergroup Perception on Group Decision Making1 , 1998 .

[21]  Gwen M. Wittenbaum,et al.  Information Sampling in Decision-Making Groups , 1998 .

[22]  Janet A. Sniezek,et al.  Cueing and Cognitive Conflict in Judge-Advisor Decision Making , 1995 .

[23]  S. Chaiken,et al.  Promoting systematic processing in low-motivation settings: effect of incongruent information on processing and judgment. , 1991, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[24]  M. Hogg,et al.  Social Identity and Social Cognition , 1999 .

[25]  D. D. Stewart,et al.  Stereotypes, Negativity Bias, and the Discussion of Unshared Information in Decision-Making Groups , 1998 .

[26]  D. A. Seaver,et al.  Eliciting subjective probability distributions on continuous variables , 1978 .

[27]  G. Stasser,et al.  Discovery of hidden profiles by decision-making groups: Solving a problem versus making a judgment. , 1992 .

[28]  A. Hollingshead.  Information Suppression and Status Persistence in Group Decision Making The Effects of Communication Media , 1996 .

[29]  G. Stasser,et al.  Information sampling in structured and unstructured discussions of three- and six-person groups. , 1989 .

[30]  A. Van Hiel,et al.  Effects of Partially Shared Information and Awareness of Unshared Information on Information Sampling , 1996 .

[31]  J. R. Larson,et al.  Discussion of shared and unshared information in decision-making groups , 1994 .

[32]  Dominic Abrams,et al.  Group motivation: Social psychological perspectives. , 1993 .

[33]  Robert S. Billings,et al.  Accountability and the discussion of unshared, critical information in decision-making groups. , 1998 .

[34]  Deborah H. Gruenfeld,et al.  Group Composition and Decision Making: How Member Familiarity and Information Distribution Affect Process and Performance , 1996 .

[35]  P. Kim.  When What You KnowCanHurt You: A Study of Experiential Effects on Group Discussion and Performance , 1997 .

[36]  V. Vroom,et al.  Leadership and decision-making , 1975 .

[37]  Reid Hastie,et al.  The impact of information on small group choice. , 1997 .

[38]  J. L. Myers,et al.  Group dynamics and individual performances: Pseudogroup and quasi-F analyses. , 1981 .

[39]  J. R. Larson,et al.  Diagnosing groups : Charting the flow of information in medical decision-making teams , 1996 .

[40]  Hayward R. Alker,et al.  Mathematics and Politics , 1965 .

[41]  I. Janis,et al.  A Practical Guide for Making Decisions , 1980 .

[42]  J. R. Larson,et al.  Information Pooling: When It Impacts Group Decision Making , 1998 .

[43]  Robin M. Hogarth,et al.  A note on aggregating opinions , 1978 .

[44]  W. Bennis,et al.  The Social Psychology of Organizations , 1966 .

[45]  A. Hollingshead.  The Rank-Order Effect in Group Decision Making , 1996 .

[46]  Richard Gonzalez,et al.  Interaction with Others Increases Decision Confidence but Not Decision Quality: Evidence against Information Collection Views of Interactive Decision Making , 1995 .

[47]  Gwen M. Wittenbaum,et al.  Management of information in small groups. , 1996 .

[48]  G. Stasser,et al.  Pooling of Unshared Information in Group Decision Making: Biased Information Sampling During Discussion , 1985 .

[49]  M. Williams,et al.  The Presence of Norms in the Absence of Groups?The Impact of Normative Influence Under Hidden-Profile Conditions , 2000 .

[50]  Erich Kirchler,et al.  The influence of member status differences and task type on group consensus and member position change , 1986 .

[51]  S. Chaiken.  Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. , 1980 .

[52]  Sniezek,et al.  The Social Influence of Confidence in Group Decision Making , 1997, Journal of experimental social psychology.

[53]  K. Propp.  Information Utilization in Small Group Decision Making , 1997 .

[54]  Franklin J. Boster,et al.  The Impact of Group Size and Proportion of Shared Information on the Exchange and Integration of Information in Groups , 1997 .