Can in vitro mammalian cell genotoxicity test results be used to complement positive results in the Ames test and help predict carcinogenic or in vivo genotoxic activity? I. Reports of individual databases presented at an EURL ECVAM Workshop.

Positive results in the Ames test correlate well with carcinogenic potential in rodents. This correlation is not perfect because mutations are only one of many stages in tumour development. Also, situations can be envisaged where the mutagenic response may be specific to the bacteria or the test protocol, e.g., bacterial-specific metabolism, exceeding a detoxification threshold, or the induction of oxidative damage to which bacteria may be more sensitive than mammalian cells in vitro or tissues in vivo. Since most chemicals are also tested for genotoxicity in mammalian cells, the pattern of mammalian cell results may help identify whether Ames-positive results predict carcinogenic or in vivo mutagenic activity. A workshop was therefore organised and sponsored by the EU Reference Laboratory for Alternatives to Animal Testing (EURL ECVAM) to investigate this further. Participants presented results from other genotoxicity tests with Ames-positive compounds. Data came from published, regulatory agency, and industry sources. The question was posed whether negative results in mammalian cell tests were associated with absence of carcinogenic or in vivo genotoxic activity despite a positive Ames test. In the limited time available, the presented data were combined and an initial analysis suggested that the association of negative in vitro mammalian cell test results with lack of in vivo genotoxic or carcinogenic activity could have some significance. Possible reasons why a positive Ames test may not be associated with in vivo activity and what additional investigations/tests might contribute to a more robust evaluation were discussed. Because a considerable overlap was identified among the different databases presented, it was recommended that a consolidated database be built, with overlapping chemicals removed, so that a more robust analysis of the predictive capacity for potential carcinogenic and in vivo genotoxic activity could be derived from the patterns of mammalian cell test results obtained for Ames-positive compounds.

[1]  H. Bartsch,et al.  Species-specific activation of phenacetin into bacterial mutagens by hamster liver enzymes and identification of N-hydroxyphenacetin O-glucuronide as a promutagen in the urine. , 1982, Cancer research.

[2]  Curtis D. Klaassen,et al.  Casarett and Doull's Toxicology. The Basic Science of Poisons , 1981 .

[3]  B. Ponder,et al.  Mutagenesis of mouse intestine in vivo using the Dlb-1 specific locus test: studies with 1,2-dimethylhydrazine, dimethylnitrosamine, and the dietary mutagen 2-amino-3,8-dimethylimidazo[4,5-f]quinoxaline. , 1990, Cancer research.

[4]  H. Matthews,et al.  Metabolism, disposition, and mutagenicity of 2,6-diaminotoluene, a mutagenic noncarcinogen. , 1989, Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals.

[5]  Raffaella Corvi,et al.  How to reduce false positive results when undertaking in vitro genotoxicity testing and thus avoid unnecessary follow-up animal tests: Report of an ECVAM Workshop. , 2007, Mutation research.

[6]  H. Ohgaki,et al.  Carcinogenicities of heterocyclic amines in cooked food. , 1991, Mutation research.

[7]  N. Vermeulen,et al.  Characterization of enzyme activities and cofactors involved in bioactivation and bioinactivation of chemical carcinogens in the tester strains Escherichia coli K12 MX100 and Salmonella typhimurium LT2 TA100. , 1997, Mutagenesis.

[8]  Herbert S. Rosenkranz,et al.  Reproducibility of microbial mutagenicity assays: I. Tests with Salmonella typhimurium and Escherichia coli using a standardized protocol , 1984 .

[9]  E Zeiger,et al.  Identification of rodent carcinogens and noncarcinogens using genetic toxicity tests: premises, promises, and performance. , 1998, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[10]  J. Kleinjans,et al.  Comparison of genotoxicant-modified transcriptomic responses in conventional and epigenetically stabilized primary rat hepatocytes with in vivo rat liver data , 2012, Archives of Toxicology.

[11]  S. Fukushima,et al.  Existence of a no effect level for MeIQx hepatocarcinogenicity on a background of thioacetamide‐induced liver damage in rats , 2006, Cancer science.

[12]  E. Zeiger,et al.  Salmonella mutagenicity test results for 250 chemicals. , 1983, Environmental mutagenesis.

[13]  A. Boobis,et al.  N-hydroxy-MeIQx is the major microsomal oxidation product of the dietary carcinogen MeIQx with human liver. , 1992, Carcinogenesis.

[14]  A. Carrano,et al.  Genotoxicity of compounds from cooked beef in repair-deficient CHO cells versus Salmonella mutagenicity. , 1987, Mutagenesis.

[15]  T. Kumaravel,et al.  In vitro genotoxicity of para-phenylenediamine and its N-monoacetyl or N,N'-diacetyl metabolites. , 2006, Mutation research.

[16]  E. Zeiger Mutagens that are not carcinogens: faulty theory or faulty tests? , 2001, Mutation research.

[17]  Francisco Castillo,et al.  Reduction of polynitroaromatic compounds: the bacterial nitroreductases. , 2008, FEMS microbiology reviews.

[18]  T. Tsukamoto,et al.  Lack of initiation activity in rat liver of low doses of 2-amino-3,8-dimethylimidazo[4,5-f]quinoxaline. , 2003, Cancer letters.

[19]  B. Ames,et al.  Detection of carcinogens as mutagens in the Salmonella/microsome test: assay of 300 chemicals. , 1975, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[20]  Raffaella Corvi,et al.  an in vitro mammalian cell genotoxicity test results be used to omplement positive results in the Ames test and help predict arcinogenic or in vivo genotoxic activity ? II . Construction and nalysis of a consolidated database , 2014 .

[21]  M. Bayliss,et al.  Evaluation of pyrazole and ethanol induced S9 fraction in bacterial mutagenicity testing. , 1994, Mutagenesis.

[22]  Katie Smith,et al.  Reduction of misleading ("false") positive results in mammalian cell genotoxicity assays. I. Choice of cell type. , 2012, Mutation research.

[23]  B. Ames,et al.  An alkyl hydroperoxide reductase from Salmonella typhimurium involved in the defense of DNA against oxidative damage. Purification and properties. , 1989, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[24]  J. Kleinjans,et al.  A transcriptomics-based in vitro assay for predicting chemical genotoxicity in vivo. , 2012, Carcinogenesis.

[25]  I. Lambert,et al.  Detailed review of transgenic rodent mutation assays. , 2005, Mutation research.

[26]  Distinction of mutagenic carcinogens from a mutagenic noncarcinogen in the big blue transgenic mouse. , 1996 .

[27]  A. Bianchi-Santamaria,et al.  Human lymphocyte micronucleus genotoxicity test with mixtures of phytochemicals in environmental concentrations. , 1997, Mutation research.

[28]  W. Kalow Pharmacogenetics of drug metabolism , 1980 .

[29]  S. Pfuhler,et al.  N-acetylation of three aromatic amine hair dye precursor molecules eliminates their genotoxic potential. , 2014, Mutagenesis.

[30]  Keith T Palmer,et al.  IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans. Volume 98: Painting, Firefighting and Shiftwork. International Agency for Research on Cancer , 2011 .

[31]  T. Sugimura,et al.  Overview of carcinogenic heterocyclic amines. , 1997, Mutation research.

[32]  T. Sugimura,et al.  Environmental mutagens and carcinogens. , 1978, Annual review of genetics.

[33]  J. Ashby,et al.  A non-invasive micronucleus assay in the rat liver. , 1988, Mutation research.

[34]  E Kennepohl,et al.  A procedure for the safety evaluation of flavouring substances. Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives. , 1999, Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association.

[35]  M M Moore,et al.  The L5178Y/tk+/- mouse lymphoma specific gene and chromosomal mutation assay a phase III report of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Gene-Tox Program. , 1997, Mutation research.

[36]  Katie Smith,et al.  Reduction of misleading ("false") positive results in mammalian cell genotoxicity assays. II. Importance of accurate toxicity measurement. , 2012, Mutation research.

[37]  Jasper Becker,et al.  Joint Research Centre , 1982, Nature.

[38]  Vera Rogiers,et al.  Retrospective analysis of the mutagenicity/genotoxicity data of the cosmetic ingredients present on the Annexes of the Cosmetic EU legislation (2000-12). , 2014, Mutagenesis.

[39]  A. Carrano,et al.  In vivo cytogenetic effects of cooked food mutagens. , 1989, Mutation research.

[40]  Lutz Müller,et al.  Evaluation of the ability of a battery of three in vitro genotoxicity tests to discriminate rodent carcinogens and non-carcinogens I. Sensitivity, specificity and relative predictivity. , 2005, Mutation research.

[41]  S. Fukushima,et al.  Existence of no-observed effect levels for 2-amino-3,8-dimethylimidazo[4,5-f]quinoxaline on hepatic preneoplastic lesion development in BN rats. , 2006, Cancer letters.

[42]  S. Stasiewicz,et al.  Chemicals showing no evidence of carcinogenicity in long-term, two-species rodent studies: the need for short-term test data. , 1984, Environmental mutagenesis.

[43]  E. Zeiger,et al.  Salmonella mutagenicity tests: V. Results from the testing of 311 chemicals , 1992, Environmental and molecular mutagenesis.

[44]  S. Li,et al.  [Induction of micronucleus by organophosphorus pesticides both in vivo and in vitro]. , 1993, Hua xi yi ke da xue xue bao = Journal of West China University of Medical Sciences = Huaxi yike daxue xuebao.

[45]  David Kirkland,et al.  A core in vitro genotoxicity battery comprising the Ames test plus the in vitro micronucleus test is sufficient to detect rodent carcinogens and in vivo genotoxins. , 2011, Mutation research.

[46]  T Sofuni,et al.  Evaluation of the rodent micronucleus assay in the screening of IARC carcinogens (groups 1, 2A and 2B) the summary report of the 6th collaborative study by CSGMT/JEMS MMS. Collaborative Study of the Micronucleus Group Test. Mammalian Mutagenicity Study Group. , 1997, Mutation research.

[47]  T. Sofuni,et al.  Validation study of the in vitro micronucleus test in a Chinese hamster lung cell line (CHL/IU). , 1999, Mutagenesis.

[48]  P. Kasper,et al.  Evaluation studies on the in vitro rat hepatocyte micronucleus assay. , 1995, Mutation research.

[49]  R. Maronpot,et al.  Correlation of hepatocellular proliferation with hepatocarcinogenicity induced by the mutagenic noncarcinogen:carcinogen pair--2,6- and 2,4-diaminotoluene. , 1991, Toxicology and applied pharmacology.