The three‐axial gyroscope sensor detects the turning point between opening and closing phases of chewing

Most devices measuring the kinematics of masticatory function are cumbersome to setup and not portable. Data collection would be facilitated, particularly in the elderly, if the device used for the objective measurement of mastication was easily transportable and simple to setup. Accelerometers and gyroscope sensors are lightweight and portable and may be useful alternatives. The definition of the turning point between the opening and closing phases of chewing is important for studies of associations between muscle activity and effects of perturbations. Measures of the mediolateral angle (specifically, the mandibular tilt from the lateral view) allow the detection of the turning point between the opening and closing phases. The aim was to determine whether a three‐axial gyroscope sensor can detect the turning point between opening and closing phases of chewing. Fourteen asymptomatic participants chewed gum while the output was recorded from a three‐axial gyroscope sensor (Seiko Epson, Japan) attached to the chin and a 6 degree‐of‐freedom electromagnetic jaw‐tracking device (Pollhemus, USA). Bland–Altman plots were used to assess the matching of the recordings made by the three‐axial gyroscope sensor and the jaw‐tracking device. The turning points between the opening and closing phases of chewing matched closely when recorded by a jaw‐tracking device and when using a three‐axial gyroscope sensor. A three‐axial gyroscope sensor can validly detect the turning point between the opening and closing phases during chewing of gum.

[1]  T. Nemoto,et al.  Measurement of jerk-cost using a triaxial piezoelectric accelerometer for the evaluation of jaw movement smoothness. , 2010, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[2]  A. Yoshihara,et al.  Evaluation of chewing ability and its relationship with activities of daily living, depression, cognitive status and food intake in the community‐dwelling elderly , 2013, Geriatrics & gerontology international.

[3]  B Hedegård,et al.  The relative movements of the chin and the mandible during chewing. , 1982, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[4]  Timothy S Miles,et al.  A simple and inexpensive system for monitoring jaw movements in ambulatory humans. , 2002, Journal of biomechanics.

[5]  K. Takada,et al.  Smoothness of Human Jaw Movement during Chewing , 1999, Journal of dental research.

[6]  A. Woda,et al.  Effects of Food Texture and Sample Thickness on Mandibular Movement and Hardness Assessment during Biting in Man , 1997, Journal of dental research.

[7]  C. Peck,et al.  A method for studying jaw muscle activity during standardized jaw movements under experimental jaw muscle pain , 2006, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[8]  T. Nemoto,et al.  A comparison between jerk-cost derived from a jaw-tracking system with that from an accelerometer. , 2011, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[9]  Yutaka Watanabe,et al.  Relationship between chewing ability and sarcopenia in Japanese community‐dwelling older adults , 2015, Geriatrics & gerontology international.

[10]  T. Nemoto,et al.  Jaw-movement smoothness during empty chewing and gum chewing. , 2012, European journal of oral sciences.

[11]  W. Gomes-Leal,et al.  Masticatory Deficiency as a Risk Factor for Cognitive Dysfunction , 2014, International journal of medical sciences.

[12]  Hiroshi Fujii,et al.  Newly Designed Jaw Tracking System with Six-degree-of-freedom Based on a Low-frequency Magnetic Transducing Technology , 2003 .

[13]  The effect of food bolus location on jaw movement smoothness and masticatory efficiency. , 2012, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[14]  A. Bilt,et al.  Assessment of mastication with implications for oral rehabilitation: a review. , 2011, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[15]  A. Herrel,et al.  Chewing variation in lepidosaurs and primates , 2010, Journal of Experimental Biology.