Limits of Feedback Control in Bacterial Chemotaxis

Inputs to signaling pathways can have complex statistics that depend on the environment and on the behavioral response to previous stimuli. Such behavioral feedback is particularly important in navigation. Successful navigation relies on proper coupling between sensors, which gather information during motion, and actuators, which control behavior. Because reorientation conditions future inputs, behavioral feedback can place sensors and actuators in an operational regime different from the resting state. How then can organisms maintain proper information transfer through the pathway while navigating diverse environments? In bacterial chemotaxis, robust performance is often attributed to the zero integral feedback control of the sensor, which guarantees that activity returns to resting state when the input remains constant. While this property provides sensitivity over a wide range of signal intensities, it remains unclear how other parameters such as adaptation rate and adapted activity affect chemotactic performance, especially when considering that the swimming behavior of the cell determines the input signal. We examine this issue using analytical models and simulations that incorporate recent experimental evidences about behavioral feedback and flagellar motor adaptation. By focusing on how sensory information carried by the response regulator is best utilized by the motor, we identify an operational regime that maximizes drift velocity along chemical concentration gradients for a wide range of environments and sensor adaptation rates. This optimal regime is outside the dynamic range of the motor response, but maximizes the contrast between run duration up and down gradients. In steep gradients, the feedback from chemotactic drift can push the system through a bifurcation. This creates a non-chemotactic state that traps cells unless the motor is allowed to adapt. Although motor adaptation helps, we find that as the strength of the feedback increases individual phenotypes cannot maintain the optimal operational regime in all environments, suggesting that diversity could be beneficial.

[1]  Y. Tu Quantitative modeling of bacterial chemotaxis: signal amplification and accurate adaptation. , 2013, Annual review of biophysics.

[2]  Pablo A. Iglesias,et al.  Optimal Noise Filtering in the Chemotactic Response of Escherichia coli , 2006, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[3]  Nikita Vladimirov,et al.  Imprecision of Adaptation in Escherichia coli Chemotaxis , 2014, PloS one.

[4]  D. Koshland,et al.  Non-genetic individuality: chance in the single cell , 1976, Nature.

[5]  Howard C. Berg,et al.  Adaptation at the output of the chemotaxis signalling pathway , 2012, Nature.

[6]  Ido Golding,et al.  Chemotactic adaptation kinetics of individual Escherichia coli cells , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[7]  Thierry Emonet,et al.  Stochastic coordination of multiple actuators reduces latency and improves chemotactic response in bacteria , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[8]  Yuhai Tu,et al.  Tandem adaptation with a common design in Escherichia coli chemotaxis. , 2012, Journal of molecular biology.

[9]  Tailin Wu,et al.  Frequency-dependent Escherichia coli chemotaxis behavior. , 2012, Physical review letters.

[10]  Nikita Vladimirov,et al.  Role of Translational Coupling in Robustness of Bacterial Chemotaxis Pathway , 2009, PLoS biology.

[11]  H. Berg,et al.  Ultrasensitivity of an adaptive bacterial motor. , 2013, Journal of molecular biology.

[12]  Nikita Vladimirov,et al.  Dependence of Bacterial Chemotaxis on Gradient Shape and Adaptation Rate , 2008, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[13]  Massimo Vergassola,et al.  Bacterial strategies for chemotaxis response , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[14]  H. Berg The rotary motor of bacterial flagella. , 2003, Annual review of biochemistry.

[15]  P. Cluzel,et al.  Relationship between cellular response and behavioral variability in bacterial chemotaxis , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[16]  Thierry Emonet,et al.  Adaptation Dynamics in Densely Clustered Chemoreceptors , 2013, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[17]  William S. Ryu,et al.  Real-Time Imaging of Fluorescent Flagellar Filaments , 2000, Journal of bacteriology.

[18]  Howard C. Berg,et al.  Mechanism for adaptive remodeling of the bacterial flagellar switch , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[19]  H. Berg,et al.  Functional interactions between receptors in bacterial chemotaxis , 2004, Nature.

[20]  M. Vergassola,et al.  Noninvasive inference of the molecular chemotactic response using bacterial trajectories , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[21]  J. Timmer,et al.  Design principles of a bacterial signalling network , 2005, Nature.

[22]  Damon A. Clark,et al.  The bacterial chemotactic response reflects a compromise between transient and steady-state behavior. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[23]  H. Berg,et al.  Transient response to chemotactic stimuli in Escherichia coli. , 1975, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[24]  Sriram Subramaniam,et al.  Chemotaxis kinase CheA is activated by three neighbouring chemoreceptor dimers as effectively as by receptor clusters , 2011, Molecular microbiology.

[25]  B. Perthame,et al.  Directional persistence of chemotactic bacteria in a traveling concentration wave , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[26]  Dan V Nicolau,et al.  Directional persistence and the optimality of run-and-tumble chemotaxis , 2009, Comput. Biol. Chem..

[27]  Tailin Wu,et al.  Pathway-based mean-field model for Escherichia coli chemotaxis. , 2012, Physical review letters.

[28]  D. Bray,et al.  Receptor clustering as a cellular mechanism to control sensitivity , 1998, Nature.

[29]  Christopher V. Rao,et al.  High-resolution, long-term characterization of bacterial motility using optical tweezers , 2009, Nature Methods.

[30]  Nikita Vladimirov,et al.  Thermal Robustness of Signaling in Bacterial Chemotaxis , 2011, Cell.

[31]  H. Berg,et al.  A modular gradient-sensing network for chemotaxis in Escherichia coli revealed by responses to time-varying stimuli , 2010, Molecular systems biology.

[32]  R. Rosenfeld Nature , 2009, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[33]  Roman Stocker,et al.  Response rescaling in bacterial chemotaxis , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[34]  J. Vilar,et al.  From molecular noise to behavioural variability in a single bacterium , 2004, Nature.

[35]  J. Doyle,et al.  Robust perfect adaptation in bacterial chemotaxis through integral feedback control. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[36]  P. Gennes Chemotaxis: the role of internal delays , 2004, European Biophysics Journal.

[37]  H. Berg,et al.  Adaptation kinetics in bacterial chemotaxis , 1983, Journal of bacteriology.

[38]  H. Berg,et al.  Chemotaxis in Escherichia coli analysed by Three-dimensional Tracking , 1972, Nature.

[39]  U. Alon,et al.  Robustness in bacterial chemotaxis , 2022 .

[40]  M. Schnitzer,et al.  Theory of continuum random walks and application to chemotaxis. , 1993, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[41]  P. Cluzel,et al.  Interdependence of behavioural variability and response to small stimuli in bacteria , 2010, Nature.

[42]  S. Leibler,et al.  An ultrasensitive bacterial motor revealed by monitoring signaling proteins in single cells. , 2000, Science.

[43]  J. Locsei,et al.  Persistence of direction increases the drift velocity of run and tumble chemotaxis , 2007, Journal of mathematical biology.

[44]  Eduardo Sontag,et al.  Untangling the wires: A strategy to trace functional interactions in signaling and gene networks , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[45]  Ned S Wingreen,et al.  Responding to chemical gradients: bacterial chemotaxis. , 2012, Current opinion in cell biology.

[46]  H. Othmer,et al.  Excitation and Adaptation in Bacteria–a Model Signal Transduction System that Controls Taxis and Spatial Pattern Formation , 2013, International journal of molecular sciences.

[47]  Ido Golding,et al.  Escherichia coli swimming is robust against variations in flagellar number , 2014, eLife.