Hemispheric Differences in Global/Local Processing Revealed by Same-Different Judgements

This paper investigates the hypothesis that the left and right hemispheres of the human brain are specialized for processing local and global stimulus information, respectively. Also, functional hemispheric differences with respect to “same‐ different“ judgements are considered. The hypothesis was tested that the right hemisphere produces faster “same” judgements than the left hemisphere, whereas the opposite holds for “different” judgements. Two matching experiments are reported, in which compound test stimuli were presented either in the left or right visual field. The results of both experiments support the hypothesis that hemispheres are differently specialized for global/local processing. However, there was no indication that the hemispheres differ with respect to “same‐different” judgements.

[1]  C. Umilta,et al.  Can an Analytic/Holistic Dichotomy Explain Hemispheric Asymmetries? , 1982, Cortex.

[2]  Zohar Eviatar,et al.  Nominal and physical decision criteria insame-different judgments , 1994, Perception & psychophysics.

[3]  J L Bradshaw,et al.  Differential hemispheric mediation of nonverbal visual stimuli. , 1975, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[4]  J. Sergent.  The cerebral balance of power: confrontation or cooperation? , 1982, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[5]  Robert W. Proctor,et al.  A unified theory for matching-task phenomena. , 1981 .

[6]  Frances McGlannan.  BRAIN — Asymmetry , 1976 .

[7]  D. Boles,et al.  An Experimental Comparison of Stimulus Type, Display Type, and Input Variable Contributions to Visual Field Asymmetry , 1994, Brain and Cognition.

[8]  D B Boles,et al.  Variability in letter-matching asymmetry , 1981, Perception & psychophysics.

[9]  David B. Boles,et al.  Hemispheric Differences in Global versus Local Processing: Still Unclear , 1996, Brain and Cognition.

[10]  Lynn C. Robertson,et al.  Interhemispheric relations in processing hierarchical patterns: Evidence from normal and commissurotomized subjects. , 1993 .

[11]  D. Navon.  Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception , 1977, Cognitive Psychology.

[12]  O. Koenig,et al.  Separable Mechanisms in Face Processing: Evidence from Hemispheric Specialization , 1991, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[13]  L. Robertson,et al.  Neuropsychological contributions to theories of part/whole organization , 1991, Cognitive Psychology.

[14]  D. Bamber.  Reaction times and error rates for “same”-“different” judgments of multidimensional stimull , 1969 .

[15]  D. Boles.  Global versus local processing: Is there a hemispheric dichotomy? , 1984, Neuropsychologia.

[16]  Maryanne Martin.  Local and global processing: The role of sparsity , 1979 .

[17]  R. Knight,et al.  Component mechanisms underlying the processing of hierarchically organized patterns: inferences from patients with unilateral cortical lesions. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[18]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Response competition effects insame-different judgments , 1982, Perception & psychophysics.

[19]  J. Bradshaw,et al.  The nature of hemispheric specialization in man , 1981, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[20]  Jeff Miller.  Global precedence in attention and decision. , 1981 .

[21]  J. Wilding,et al.  Hemispheric Differences in Matching Stroop-Type Letter Stimuli , 1982, Cortex.

[22]  D. A. Taylor.  Effect of identity in the multiletter matching task. , 1976, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[23]  Charles W. Eriksen,et al.  Response competition produces a "fast same effect" in same-different judgments. , 1991 .

[24]  D B Boles,et al.  Symmetry and similarity effects in the comparison of visual patterns , 1983, Perception & psychophysics.

[25]  Ronald Hübner,et al.  The effect of spatial frequency on global precedence and hemispheric differences , 1997, Perception & psychophysics.

[26]  F. G. Worden,et al.  The neurosciences : third study program , 1974 .

[27]  R. Sperry.  Lateral specialization in the surgically separated hemispheres. , 1974 .

[28]  R. A. Kinchla,et al.  Attending to different levels of structure in a visual image , 1983, Perception & psychophysics.

[29]  J E Hoffman,et al.  Interaction between global and local levels of a form. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[30]  D. Navon,et al.  Testing a queue hypothesis for the processing of global and local information. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[31]  L E Krueger,et al.  A theory of perceptual matching. , 1978, Psychological review.

[32]  M. V. Kleeck.  Hemispheric differences in global versus local processing of hierarchical visual stimuli by normal subjects: New data and a meta-analysis of previous studies , 1989, Neuropsychologia.

[33]  Richard S. J. Frackowiak,et al.  Where in the brain does visual attention select the forest and the trees? , 1996, Nature.