Does altruism play a role in determining U.S. consumer preferences and willingness to pay for natural and regionally produced beef

An area of increasing differentiation among meat products relates to the source-of-origin and types of production methods used to raise the animals. Consumer data collected from a U.S. national online survey was used to estimate the factors helping explain consumers' willingness to purchase and pay a higher premium for two natural and regionally produced beef products: ground beef and USDA (United States Department of Agriculture) Choice rib eye steaks. Consumer preferences for natural and regionally produced beef are shown to be motivated by a combination of perceptions of personal benefits and altruistic factors. Additionally, the results of probit models indicate that the probability a consumer will pay more or less of a premium depends on purchase behavior and shopping location, stated importance of production attributes, awareness and interest in private and civic agricultural issues, in addition to some typical demographic variables such as income. lEconLit Citations: Q130, M130, Q180r. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

[1]  Kyrre Rickertsen,et al.  SC-X: CALIBRATING STATED CHOICE SURVEYS WITH EXPERIMENTAL AUCTION MARKETS , 2003 .

[2]  Daniel R. Williams,et al.  Consumers’ Willingness to Purchase Locally Produced Agricultural Products: An Analysis of an Indiana Survey , 2000, Agricultural and Resource Economics Review.

[3]  T. Schroeder,et al.  Are Choice Experiments Incentive Compatible? A Test with Quality Differentiated Beef Steaks , 2004 .

[4]  J. Lusk,et al.  Consumer Demand for Mandatory Labeling of Beef from Cattle Administered Growth Hormones or Fed Genetically Modified Corn , 2002, Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics.

[5]  P. Mcdevitt,et al.  Proprietary market research: are online panels appropriate? , 2002 .

[6]  Jutta Roosen,et al.  Demand for Beef from Cattle Administered Growth Hormones or Fed Genetically Modified Corn: A Comparison of Consumers in France, Germany, the United Kingdom, and the United States , 2003 .

[7]  Peter C. Boxall,et al.  Do Ethical Consumers Care About Price? A Revealed Preference Analysis of Fair Trade Coffee Purchases , 2006 .

[8]  D. Dickinson,et al.  Meat Traceability: Are U.S. Consumers Willing to Pay for It? , 2002 .

[9]  M. Loureiro,et al.  Assessing Consumer Preferences for Country-of-Origin Labeling , 2005, Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics.

[10]  John A. List,et al.  What Experimental Protocol Influence Disparities Between Actual and Hypothetical Stated Values? , 2001 .

[11]  C. Calkins,et al.  Country-of-Origin Labeling of Beef Products: U.S. Consumers' Perceptions , 2003 .

[12]  David Zilberman,et al.  Public goods and the value of product quality regulations: the case of food safety , 2003 .

[13]  David L. Sunding,et al.  The Role for Government in Differentiated Product Markets: Looking to Economic Theory , 2003 .

[14]  Matthew C. Rousu,et al.  Consumer Willingness to Pay for Genetically Modified Food Labels in a Market with Diverse Information: Evidence from Experimental Auctions , 2003 .

[15]  T. Schroeder,et al.  Consumer Food Safety Risk Perceptions and Attitudes: Impacts on Beef Consumption across Countries , 2007 .

[16]  W. Umberger,et al.  A Cluster Analysis of Natural Beef Product Consumers by Shopping Behavior, Importance of Production Attributes, and Demographics , 2005 .

[17]  M. Loureiro,et al.  Do fair trade and eco-labels in coffee wake up the consumer conscience? , 2005 .

[18]  REGIONAL DEMAND FOR NATURAL BEEF PRODUCTS IN COLORADO: TARGET CONSUMERS AND WILLINGNESS TO PAY , 2003 .

[19]  R. G. Cummings,et al.  Homegrown Values and Hypothetical Surveys: Is the Dichotomous Choice Approach Incentive-Compatible? , 1995 .

[20]  A. Wirthgen.  Consumer, retailer, and producer assessments of product differentiation according to regional origin and process quality , 2005 .

[21]  John B. Loomis.  An investigation into the reliability of intended visitation behavior , 1993 .

[22]  Robert L. Hicks,et al.  Can Eco-Labels Tune a Market? Evidence from Dolphin-Safe Labeling , 2002 .

[23]  Julie A. Caswell,et al.  Using Informational Labeling to Influence the Market for Quality in Food Products , 1996 .

[24]  M. Loureiro,et al.  Estimating Consumer Willingness to Pay for Country-of-Origin Labeling , 2003 .

[25]  J. Whitehead,et al.  Are Hypothetical Referenda Incentive Compatible? A comment , 1999, Journal of Political Economy.

[26]  W. Umberger.  Will Consumers Pay a Premium for Country-of-Origin Labeled Meat? , 2004 .

[27]  Thomas A. Burnham,et al.  CONSUMER RESPONSE TO GENETICALLY MODIFIED FOODS: MARKET SEGMENT ANALYSIS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR PRODUCERS AND POLICY MAKERS , 2001 .

[28]  D. Lansky,et al.  Online Consumer Surveys as a Methodology for Assessing the Quality of the United States Health Care System , 2004, Journal of medical Internet research.

[29]  J. Lusk,et al.  Public Preferences and Private Choices: Effect of Altruism and Free Riding on Demand for Environmentally Certified Pork , 2007 .

[30]  J. Codron,et al.  Social and environmental attributes of food products in an emerging mass market: Challenges of signaling and consumer perception, with European illustrations , 2006 .

[31]  D. Thilmany,et al.  Marketing natural pork: An empirical analysis of consumers in the mountain region , 2002 .

[32]  R. G. Cummings,et al.  Are Hypothetical Referenda Incentive Compatible? , 1997, Journal of Political Economy.