Competitiveness of Brazilian sugarcane ethanol compared to US corn ethanol

Corn ethanol produced in the US and sugarcane ethanol produced in Brazil are the world's leading sources of biofuel. Current US biofuel policies create both incentives and constraints for the import of ethanol from Brazil and together with the cost competitiveness and greenhouse gas intensity of sugarcane ethanol compared to corn ethanol will determine the extent of these imports. This study analyzes the supply-side determinants of cost competitiveness and compares the greenhouse gas intensity of corn ethanol and sugarcane ethanol delivered to US ports. We find that while the cost of sugarcane ethanol production in Brazil is lower than that of corn ethanol in the US, the inclusion of transportation costs for the former and co-product credits for the latter changes their relative competitiveness. We also find that the relative cost of ethanol in the US and Brazil is highly sensitive to the prevailing exchange rate and prices of feedstocks. At an exchange rate of US$1=R$2.15 the cost of corn ethanol is 15% lower than the delivered cost of sugarcane ethanol at a US port. Sugarcane ethanol has lower GHG emissions than corn ethanol but a price of over $113 per ton of CO2 is needed to affect competitiveness.

[1]  Daniel Alves Aguiar,et al.  Prospects of the sugarcane expansion in Brazil: impacts on direct and indirect land use changes. , 2008 .

[2]  S. Paltsev,et al.  Biofuels and Land Use Change , 2008 .

[3]  J. Seabra,et al.  Green house gases emissions in the production and use of ethanol from sugarcane in Brazil: the 2005/2006 averages and a prediction for 2020. , 2008 .

[4]  Michael Q. Wang,et al.  Life-cycle energy and greenhouse gas emission impacts of different corn ethanol plant types , 2007 .

[5]  K. Cassman,et al.  Improvements in Life Cycle Energy Efficiency and Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Corn‐Ethanol , 2009 .

[6]  Martin Junginger,et al.  Explaining the experience curve: Cost reductions of Brazilian ethanol from sugarcane , 2009 .

[7]  Jacinto F. Fabiosa,et al.  Use of U.S. Croplands for Biofuels Increases Greenhouse Gases Through Emissions from Land-Use Change , 2008, Science.

[8]  José Roberto Moreira,et al.  Historical carbon budget of the brazilian ethanol program , 2009 .

[9]  Andrew D. Jones,et al.  Effects of US Maize Ethanol on Global Land Use and Greenhouse Gas Emissions: Estimating Market-Mediated Responses , 2010 .

[10]  David Zilberman,et al.  Price Transmission in the US Ethanol Market , 2010 .

[11]  Guenter Schamel,et al.  The International Competitiveness of the U.S. Corn-Ethanol Industry , 2006 .

[12]  J. G. van de Vooren,et al.  Sugarcane ethanol: contributions to climate change mitigation and the environment , 2008 .

[13]  Andrew D. Jones,et al.  Supporting Online Material for: Ethanol Can Contribute To Energy and Environmental Goals , 2006 .

[14]  Wallace E. Tyner,et al.  ECONOMIC AND TECHNICAL ANALYSIS OF ETHANOL DRY MILLING: MODEL DESCRIPTION , 2006 .

[15]  Joaquim E. A. Seabra,et al.  Mitigation of GHG emissions using sugarcane bioethanol. , 2008 .

[16]  S. Polasky,et al.  Land Clearing and the Biofuel Carbon Debt , 2008, Science.

[17]  Andrew J. McAloon,et al.  Understanding the reductions in US corn ethanol production costs: an experience curve approach , 2009 .

[18]  J. Goldemberg,et al.  The Sustainability of Ethanol Production from Sugarcane , 2008, Renewable Energy.

[19]  J. Moreira,et al.  The alcohol program , 1999 .

[20]  S. Palaniappan.  Illinois Agronomy Handbook , 1995 .