Brazilian adolescents' prosocial moral judgment and behavior: relations to sympathy, perspective taking, gender-role orientation, and demographic characteristics.

The goal of this study was to examine demographic and individual difference variables that predict level of prosocial moral judgment and self-reported prosocial behavior and to test mediating or moderating relations among predictors. The relations of prosocial moral reasoning and self-reported prosocial behavior to perspective taking, sympathy, age, sociometric status, and gender-role orientation were examined with a sample of 149 Brazilian adolescents who completed a series of questionnaire measures. Prosocial moral judgment was expected to be predicted by both sympathy and perspective taking, whereas sympathy or prosocial moral judgment was expected to mediate the relations of femininity and perspective taking to prosocial behavior. Self-reported perspective taking and sympathy interacted when predicting prosocial moral judgment; adolescents who were high in either sympathy or perspective taking (or both) scored high in prosocial moral reasoning. A feminine orientation predicted sympathy and perspective taking, perspective taking predicted prosocial moral reasoning and sympathy, and sympathy had both direct and indirect paths (through moral judgment) to prosocial behavior. The findings generally were consistent with the contention that both the tendency to take others' perspectives and to sympathize are related to level of prosocial moral reasoning, which in turn motivates prosocial behavior. Moreover, patterns of correlations among variables were similar to those found in the United States.

[1]  D. Mackinnon,et al.  Estimating Mediated Effects in Prevention Studies , 1993 .

[2]  J. Block.  Differential premises arising from differential socialization of the sexes: some conjectures. , 1983, Child development.

[3]  W. M. Bernstein,et al.  Perspective-Taking, Self-Consciousness, and Accuracy in Person Perception , 1982 .

[4]  C. Gilligan.  In a Different Voice. Psychological Theory and Women’s Development. Cambridge, MA (Harvard University Press) 1982. , 1982 .

[5]  N. Eisenberg,et al.  Prosocial Moral Reasoning in Institutionalized Delinquent, Orphaned, and Noninstitutionalized Brazilian Adolescents , 1998 .

[6]  R. Enright,et al.  Handbook of Moral Behavior and Development , 1991 .

[7]  Daniel Bar-Tal,et al.  Sequential development of helping behavior: A cognitive-learning approach , 1982 .

[8]  I. Sigel,et al.  HANDBOOK OF CHILD PSYCHOLOGY , 2006 .

[9]  S. Bem.  The measurement of psychological androgyny. , 1974, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[10]  Mark H. Davis.  Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. , 1983 .

[11]  Goslin,et al.  Handbook of socialization theory and research , 1969 .

[12]  H. Triandis,et al.  Individualism and Collectivism: Cross-cultural Perspectives on Self-ingroup Relationships We Wish to Thank Our Research Collaborators for Stimulating Ideas, Data, and Moral Support in Carrying out a Complex Set of Studies. They , 2022 .

[13]  J. Gibbs,et al.  Social Perspective Taking and Moral Judgment among College Students , 1993 .

[14]  C. Batson.  The Altruism Question: Toward A Social-psychological Answer , 1991 .

[15]  N. Eisenberg,et al.  Empathy and its development , 1987 .

[16]  N. Eisenberg,et al.  Relations of Moral Reasoning and Vicarious Emotion to Young Children's Prosocial Behavior Toward Peers and Adults , 1996 .

[17]  R. Menna,et al.  Social perspective taking , 1997 .

[18]  N. Eisenberg,et al.  The relations of emotionality and regulation to dispositional and situational empathy-related responding. , 1994, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[19]  Feshbach Nd,et al.  Studies of empathic behavior in children. , 1978 .

[20]  Anne Colby,et al.  A Longitudinal Study of Moral Judgment. , 1983 .

[21]  J. Haidt,et al.  Affect, culture, and morality, or is it wrong to eat your dog? , 1993, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[22]  N. Eisenberg,et al.  An Objective Measure of Adolescents' Prosocial Moral Reasoning , 1992 .

[23]  Kenneth A. Bollen,et al.  Structural Equations with Latent Variables , 1989 .

[24]  Nancy Eisenberg,et al.  Altruistic emotion, cognition, and behavior , 1986 .

[25]  D. R. Shaffer.  Social and personality development , 1979 .

[26]  Mark H. Davis.  Empathy: A Social Psychological Approach , 1994 .

[27]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[28]  L. Kohlberg.  Stage and sequence: The cognitive-developmental approach to socialization , 1969 .

[29]  R. Selman.  The growth of interpersonal understanding : developmental and clinical analyses , 1980 .

[30]  J. Marcia,et al.  Care-oriented moral reasoning and prosocial behavior: A question of gender or sex role orientation , 1994 .

[31]  B. Moore,et al.  Perspective-taking and altruism. , 1982 .

[32]  N. Eisenberg,et al.  Prosocial development in late adolescence: a longitudinal study. , 1995, Child development.

[33]  Eva P. Lester,et al.  Intelligence and Affectivity , 1985 .

[34]  L. Kohlberg,et al.  Child Psychology and Childhood Education: A Cognitive-Developmental View , 1987 .

[35]  H. Triandis,et al.  Multimethod probes of individualism and collectivism. , 1990 .

[36]  N. Eisenberg,et al.  Prosocial Development in Middle Childhood: A Longitudinal Study. , 1987 .

[37]  S. West,et al.  Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. , 1994 .

[38]  Nancy Eisenberg,et al.  Prosocial Development in Adolescence: A Longitudinal Study , 1991 .

[39]  James R. Rest.  Moral Development: Advances in Research and Theory , 1986 .

[40]  Max H. Bazerman,et al.  The Role of Perspective-Taking Ability in Negotiating under Different Forms of Arbitration , 1983 .

[41]  James R. Rest.  Development in Judging Moral Issues , 1979 .

[42]  C. Camino,et al.  Social class effects on northeastern Brazilian children's conceptions of areas of personal choice and social regulation. , 1996, Child development.

[43]  E. E. Skoe,et al.  Sex role orientation and its relationship to the development of identity and moral thought. , 1995, Scandinavian journal of psychology.

[44]  L. Nucci.  Culture, universals, and the personal. , 1997, New directions for child development.

[45]  N. Eisenberg,et al.  The relations of dispositional regulation and emotionally to elder's empathy-related responding and affect while volunteering. , 1996, Journal of personality.

[46]  N. Eisenberg,et al.  Gender-Related traits and helping in a nonemergency situation , 1988 .

[47]  Márcia Moura da Silva,et al.  A cross-national study on the relations among prosocial moral reasoning, gender role orientations, and prosocial behaviors , 1996 .

[48]  G. Hofstede,et al.  Culture′s Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values , 1980 .

[49]  N. Eisenberg,et al.  The relation of empathy to prosocial and related behaviors. , 1987, Psychological bulletin.

[50]  S. Lobel,et al.  Compliance and Value Internalization in Brazil and the U.S. , 1990 .

[51]  J. P. Rushton,et al.  The altruistic personality and the self-report altruism scale , 1981 .

[52]  N. Eisenberg,et al.  Consistency and development of prosocial dispositions: a longitudinal study. , 1999, Child development.