Comparison of Three High-End Endoscopic Visualization Systems on Telesurgical Performance
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] L Frisén,et al. Binocular summation in humans: evidence for a hierarchic model. , 1988, The Journal of physiology.
[2] A. Li,et al. Comparison of two-dimensional vs three-dimensional camera systems in laparoscopic surgery , 1997, Surgical Endoscopy.
[3] John Kenneth Salisbury,et al. The Intuitive/sup TM/ telesurgery system: overview and application , 2000, Proceedings 2000 ICRA. Millennium Conference. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. Symposia Proceedings (Cat. No.00CH37065).
[4] Klaus Radermacher,et al. Stereoscopic Visualization in Endoscopic Surgery: Problems, Benefits, and Potentials , 1997, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.
[5] J. Rabin,et al. Two eyes are better than one: binocular enhancement in the contrast domain , 1995, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.
[6] A. Cuschieri,et al. Randomised study of influence of two-dimensional versus three-dimensional imaging on performance of laparoscopic cholecystectomy , 1998, The Lancet.
[7] Y. Dion,et al. Visual integration of data and basic motor skills under laparoscopy , 1997, Surgical Endoscopy.
[8] M. O. Schurr,et al. Vergleichsstudie verschiedener 2-D- und 3-D-Sichtsysteme in der minimal-invasiven Chirurgie , 1996, Der Chirurg.
[9] D. Jones,et al. The influence of three-dimensional video systems on laparoscopic task performance. , 1996, Surgical laparoscopy & endoscopy.