Impact of NOMA on Network Capacity Dimensioning for 5G HetNets

Non-orthogonal multiple access (NOMA) has emerged as a key technology for boosting the capacity of 5G networks. Since, the latter are expected to be heterogeneous networks (HetNets), the performance of NOMA on 5G HetNets is highly anticipated. In this paper, we present a system-level analysis, focused on the capacity dimensioning, of a 5G HetNet with hybrid multiple access where NOMA and orthogonal multiple access coexist. We use dynamic power allocation and consider four generic pairing methods for NOMA: Hungarian, Gale–Shapley, random, and exhaustive. Through our results, we show that the optimal or close-to-optimal pairing methods offer the highest capacity gain (22%–24%) when the network cells are equally loaded. On the contrary, if the load is unequal and load balancing techniques are used, simpler pairing methods offer higher gains (approximately 29%). This leads to the idea of a flexible choice of the pairing method to be used for NOMA depending on the network load, thus achieving a balance between the network capacity gain and the complexity of the pairing method. In our network, for 100 cells, the combination of the Hungarian and the random method allows supporting 4% higher network traffic volume than if either of these two methods is exclusively used. Such gain can be translated into fewer cells needed for the same traffic volume, or higher traffic volume with the same number of cells. Furthermore, our results on network user dimensioning show that NOMA and HetNets can have the capacity to cope with the high data demand expected for 5G.

[1]  Takuro Sato,et al.  Capacity Analysis of NOMA With mmWave Massive MIMO Systems , 2017, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[2]  Zhifeng Yuan,et al.  Non-orthogonal transmission technology in LTE evolution , 2016, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[3]  Harold W. Kuhn,et al.  The Hungarian method for the assignment problem , 1955, 50 Years of Integer Programming.

[4]  Shuangfeng Han,et al.  Non-orthogonal multiple access for 5G: solutions, challenges, opportunities, and future research trends , 2015, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[5]  Soo Young Shin,et al.  User pairing schemes based on channel quality indicator for uplink non-orthogonal multiple access , 2017, 2017 Ninth International Conference on Ubiquitous and Future Networks (ICUFN).

[6]  Muhammad Ali Imran,et al.  Separation Framework: An Enabler for Cooperative and D2D Communication for Future 5G Networks , 2016, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[7]  Henrik Lehrmann Christiansen,et al.  System-Level Performance of C-NOMA: A Cooperative Scheme for Capacity Enhancements in 5G Mobile Networks , 2017, 2017 IEEE 86th Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC-Fall).

[8]  Zhu Han,et al.  Spectrum Allocation and Power Control for Non-Orthogonal Multiple Access in HetNets , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[9]  H. Vincent Poor,et al.  Random Beamforming in Millimeter-Wave NOMA Networks , 2016, IEEE Access.

[10]  Theodore S. Rappaport,et al.  Millimeter Wave Mobile Communications for 5G Cellular: It Will Work! , 2013, IEEE Access.

[11]  Erik G. Larsson,et al.  Scaling Up MIMO: Opportunities and Challenges with Very Large Arrays , 2012, IEEE Signal Process. Mag..

[12]  Jinho Choi,et al.  Millimeter-Wave Communication with Non-Orthogonal Multiple Access for 5G , 2017, ArXiv.

[13]  Laurent Dussopt,et al.  Millimeter-wave access and backhauling: the solution to the exponential data traffic increase in 5G mobile communications systems? , 2014, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[14]  H. Vincent Poor,et al.  Design of Massive-MIMO-NOMA With Limited Feedback , 2015, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.

[15]  Geng Wu,et al.  Capacity and coverage enhancement in heterogeneous networks , 2011, IEEE Wireless Communications.

[16]  Henrik Lehrmann Christiansen,et al.  Performance of Non-Orthogonal Multiple Access (NOMA) in mmWave wireless communications for 5G networks , 2017, 2017 International Conference on Computing, Networking and Communications (ICNC).

[17]  George K. Karagiannidis,et al.  A Survey on Non-Orthogonal Multiple Access for 5G Networks: Research Challenges and Future Trends , 2017, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[18]  A. Sridharan Broadcast Channels , 2022 .

[19]  Marina Petrova,et al.  Proportional fairness-based user pairing and power allocation for non-orthogonal multiple access , 2015, 2015 IEEE 26th Annual International Symposium on Personal, Indoor, and Mobile Radio Communications (PIMRC).

[20]  Anass Benjebbour,et al.  Non-Orthogonal Multiple Access (NOMA) for Cellular Future Radio Access , 2013, 2013 IEEE 77th Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC Spring).

[21]  Shouyi Yang,et al.  Energy-Efficient Power Allocation in Millimeter Wave Massive MIMO With Non-Orthogonal Multiple Access , 2017, IEEE Wireless Communications Letters.

[22]  Li Ping,et al.  Comparison of orthogonal and non-orthogonal approaches to future wireless cellular systems , 2006 .

[23]  Huiling Jiang,et al.  System-level performance of downlink NOMA combined with SU-MIMO for future LTE enhancements , 2014, 2014 IEEE Globecom Workshops (GC Wkshps).

[24]  A. Lee Swindlehurst,et al.  Millimeter-wave massive MIMO: the next wireless revolution? , 2014, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[25]  Jeffrey G. Andrews,et al.  An overview of load balancing in hetnets: old myths and open problems , 2013, IEEE Wireless Communications.

[26]  Li Ping,et al.  Comparison of orthogonal and non-orthogonal approaches to future wireless cellular systems , 2006, IEEE Vehicular Technology Magazine.

[27]  Muhammad Ali Imran,et al.  Control-Data Separation Architecture for Cellular Radio Access Networks: A Survey and Outlook , 2016, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[28]  Pingzhi Fan,et al.  Impact of User Pairing on 5G Nonorthogonal Multiple-Access Downlink Transmissions , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[29]  Antti Toskala,et al.  LTE Small Cell Optimization: 3GPP Evolution to Release 13 , 2015 .

[30]  Henrik Lehrmann Christiansen,et al.  A Novel Method for Improving the Capacity in 5G Mobile Networks Combining NOMA and OMA , 2017, 2017 IEEE 85th Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC Spring).

[31]  Octavia A. Dobre,et al.  Power-Domain Non-Orthogonal Multiple Access (NOMA) in 5G Systems: Potentials and Challenges , 2016, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[32]  H. Vincent Poor,et al.  Application of Non-Orthogonal Multiple Access in LTE and 5G Networks , 2015, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[33]  Tony Q. S. Quek,et al.  Enhanced intercell interference coordination challenges in heterogeneous networks , 2011, IEEE Wireless Communications.

[34]  Long Bao Le,et al.  Massive MIMO and mmWave for 5G Wireless HetNet: Potential Benefits and Challenges , 2016, IEEE Vehicular Technology Magazine.

[35]  L. S. Shapley,et al.  College Admissions and the Stability of Marriage , 2013, Am. Math. Mon..

[36]  Wei Liang,et al.  User Pairing for Downlink Non-Orthogonal Multiple Access Networks Using Matching Algorithm , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Communications.

[37]  Yue Gao,et al.  Non-Orthogonal Multiple Access in Massive MIMO Aided Heterogeneous Networks , 2016, 2016 IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM).

[38]  Martin Haenggi,et al.  Superposition Coding Strategies: Design and Experimental Evaluation , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[39]  Soo Young Shin,et al.  User pairing schemes for capacity maximization in non-orthogonal multiple access systems , 2016, Wirel. Commun. Mob. Comput..

[40]  Anass Benjebbour,et al.  Non-orthogonal multiple access (NOMA): Concept, performance evaluation and experimental trials , 2015, 2015 International Conference on Wireless Networks and Mobile Communications (WINCOM).

[41]  William H. Lane,et al.  Stable Marriage Problem , 2001 .

[42]  Rose Qingyang Hu,et al.  An energy efficient and spectrum efficient wireless heterogeneous network framework for 5G systems , 2014, IEEE Communications Magazine.