Strength, stiffness and cyclic deformation capacity of RC frames converted into walls by infilling with RC

In seismic retrofitting of concrete buildings, frame bays are converted into reinforced concrete (RC) walls by infilling the space between the frame members with RC of a thickness of not more than their width. The cyclic behavior of the resulting wall depends on the connection between the RC infill and the surrounding RC members. The paper uses the results from 56 cyclic tests on such composite walls to express their properties in terms of the geometry, the reinforcement and the connection. Properties addressed are: (a) the yield moment at the story base; (b) the secant-to-yield-point stiffness over the shear span of the wall in a story; (c) the deflection at flexural failure in cyclic loading; (d) the cyclic shear resistance, including a sliding shear failure mode. Separate models are given for squat walls failing in shear and for those where the top of the column shears-off. The proposals are modifications of models developed in the past for monolithic RC walls from several hundred cyclic tests; blind application of these latter models as though the walls were monolithic gives, in general, unsafe predictions. By contrast, the diagonal compression strut approach in ASCE41-06 is safe-sided, but gives unacceptably large prediction scatter.

[1]  Shamim A. Sheikh,et al.  Analytical Model for Concrete Confinement in Tied Columns , 1982 .

[2]  Michael N. Fardis,et al.  Strength, deformation capacity and failure modes of RC walls under cyclic loading , 2015, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering.

[3]  Andrew S. Whittaker,et al.  Empirical equations for peak shear strength of low aspect ratio reinforced concrete walls , 2011 .

[4]  David Sanders,et al.  Seismic Performance of Two-Column Bents—Part II: Retrofit with Infill Walls , 2004 .

[5]  Rj Mainstone,et al.  SUMMARY OF PAPER 7360. ON THE STIFFNESS AND STRENGTHS OF INFILLED FRAMES. , 1971 .

[6]  M. Fardis,et al.  Degradation of Shear Strength of Reinforced Concrete Members with Inelastic Cyclic Displacements , 2004 .

[7]  Guney Ozcebe,et al.  Rehabilitation of Reinforced Concrete Frames with Reinforced Concrete Infills , 2004 .

[8]  Theocharis Papatheocharis,et al.  Design of Reinforced Concrete Infilled Frames , 2014 .

[9]  Sinan Altin,et al.  Behavior of Reinforced Concrete Frames with Reinforced Concrete Partial Infills , 2006 .

[10]  Michael N. Fardis,et al.  Deformations at flexural yielding of members with continuous or lap-spliced bars , 2010 .

[11]  Robert D. Hanson,et al.  Infilled Walls for Earthquake Strengthening , 1979 .

[12]  Guney Ozcebe,et al.  Contribution of Reinforced Concrete Infills to Seismic Behavior of Structural Systems , 2003 .

[13]  Sinan Altin,et al.  Strengthening of RC nonductile frames with RC infills: An experimental study , 2008 .

[14]  Michael N. Fardis,et al.  Flexure-controlled ultimate deformations of members with continuous or lap-spliced bars , 2010 .

[15]  Sinan Altin,et al.  An experimental study on reinforced concrete partially infilled frames , 2007 .

[16]  Ugur Ersoy,et al.  Hysteretic Response of Reinforced-Concrete Infilled Frames , 1992 .

[17]  Jean Donea,et al.  SPEAR (Seismic Performance Assessment and Rehabilitation of Existing Buildings) INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP , 2005 .

[18]  Michael N. Fardis,et al.  RC buildings retrofitted by converting frame bays into RC walls , 2013, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering.

[19]  Guney OZCEBE,et al.  EXPERIMENTAL AND ANALYTICAL STUDIES ON THE STRENGTHENING OF RC FRAMES , 2002 .

[20]  J. Mander,et al.  Theoretical stress strain model for confined concrete , 1988 .

[21]  Ugurhan Akyuz,et al.  An experimental study on two different strengthening techniques for RC frames , 2006 .

[22]  F. Michael,et al.  Seismic Performance Assessment and Rehabilitation , 2006 .

[23]  Michael N. Fardis,et al.  Experimental Investigation of Concrete Frames Infilled with rc for Seismic Rehabilitation , 2014 .