Understanding an improved cookstove program in rural Mexico: An analysis from the implementers' perspective

The adoption of innovations in rural areas depends, among many different factors, on the way development workers approach a community. Through a qualitative research methodology this study documented the adoption of a new technology, by following an improved cookstove implementation program carried out by a Mexican NGO. This technology reduces fuel consumption and addresses health impacts of indoor air pollution caused by the widespread use of traditional biomass fuels in open fires in developing countries. Different demographic and socio-economic factors have been analyzed to explain the low success rates implementation projects have faced worldwide, but there are almost no studies that examine the problem from the perspective of implementers. The aim of this study was to understand how the different visions of the individuals involved in an implementation program affect its outcome. Findings showed that the NGO work was constrained by the need to meet the commitment with sponsors. The adoption rates did not change between the first and the second stage of the project, even though the approach towards users was very different. A lack of a shared vision among the work team towards the project was found and the existence of two main perspectives among program workers—broadly described as people-centered and technology-centered—, gave place to differences in attitudes towards the program.

[1]  Everett M. Rogers,et al.  Communication Networks: Toward a New Paradigm for Research , 1980 .

[2]  Nigel Bruce,et al.  What should we be doing about kitchen smoke , 2005 .

[3]  Omar Masera,et al.  From cookstoves to cooking systems: the integrated program on sustainable household energy use in Mexico , 2005 .

[4]  M. Greeley Energy and poverty. , 1987 .

[5]  Daniel M. Kammen,et al.  Energy and health transitions in development: fuel use, stove technology, and morbidity in Jarácuaro, México , 2000 .

[6]  E. Rogers Diffusion of Innovations , 1962 .

[7]  Alan E. Bayer,et al.  Knowledge Generation, Exchange, And Utilization , 1986 .

[8]  John C. Hendee,et al.  Technology Transfer and Human Behavior , 1980 .

[9]  N. Denzin,et al.  The Landscape of Qualitative Research , 2012 .

[10]  K. Willoughby Technology Choice: A Critique of the Appropriate Technology Movement, Kelvin W. Willoughby. 1990. Westview Press, Boulder, CO. 350 pages. ISBN: 0-8133-7806-0. $NA , 1989 .

[11]  Rufus Edwards,et al.  Adoption and use of improved biomass stoves in Rural Mexico , 2011 .

[12]  Kirk R. Smith,et al.  What makes people cook with improved biomass stoves. A comparative international review of Stove Programs. Energy series. World Bank technical paper , 1994 .

[13]  Daniel M. Kammen,et al.  Mortality and Greenhouse Gas Impacts of Biomass and Petroleum Energy Futures in Africa , 2005, Science.

[14]  E. F. Schumacher,et al.  Lo pequeño es hermoso , 1988 .

[15]  J. Samet,et al.  Indoor air pollution in developing countries and acute lower respiratory infections in children , 2000, Thorax.

[16]  Omar Masera,et al.  Social perceptions about a technological innovation for fuelwood cooking : Case study in rural Mexico , 2007 .