Bipedal walking control against swing foot collision using swing foot trajectory regeneration and impact mitigation

For humanoid robots, unexpected collision can cause instability of robot balancing and damage to both robots and environment. This paper presents a reactive bipedal walking controller against swing foot collision for humanoid robots. This controller is composed of following three components: 1) Swing Foot Trajectory Regenerator, 2) Swing Foot Collision Detector, and 3) Swing Foot Impact Mitigation Controller. By regenerating swing foot trajectory depending on situations, humanoid robots can avoid falling down. However, although humanoid robots detect collision and regenerate a swing foot, collision impact can cause bad effects such as damage and posture rotation. Therefore, to mitigate strong impact, we propose Swing Foot Impact Mitigation Controller, which is composed of two controllers. The proposed method is validated through the experiments by actual humanoid robot CHIDORI. We confirm that CHIDORI can avoid falling down against collision in two situations: walking on the flat ground, and stepping up a stair.

[1]  Kazuhito Yokoi,et al.  Reactive biped walking control for a collision of a swinging foot on uneven terrain , 2011, 2011 11th IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots.

[2]  Kazuhito Yokoi,et al.  The 3D linear inverted pendulum mode: a simple modeling for a biped walking pattern generation , 2001, Proceedings 2001 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. Expanding the Societal Role of Robotics in the the Next Millennium (Cat. No.01CH37180).

[3]  Kazuhito Yokoi,et al.  Biped walking pattern generation by using preview control of zero-moment point , 2003, 2003 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.03CH37422).

[4]  Kazuhito Yokoi,et al.  Biped walking stabilization based on linear inverted pendulum tracking , 2010, 2010 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[5]  M. A. Arbib,et al.  Models of Trajectory Formation and Temporal Interaction of Reach and Grasp. , 1993, Journal of motor behavior.

[6]  Eiichi Yoshida,et al.  Reactive Leg Motion Generation Method under Consideration of Physical Constraints , 2010 .

[7]  Ryosuke Tajima,et al.  Fast running experiments involving a humanoid robot , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[8]  Masayuki Inaba,et al.  Thermal control of electrical motors for high-power humanoid robots , 2008, 2008 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[9]  Masayuki Inaba,et al.  Walking control in water considering reaction forces from water for humanoid robots with a waterproof suit , 2016, 2016 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS).

[10]  Tomomichi Sugihara,et al.  Standing stabilizability and stepping maneuver in planar bipedalism based on the best COM-ZMP regulator , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[11]  Benjamin J. Stephens,et al.  Humanoid push recovery , 2007, 2007 7th IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots.

[12]  Matthew M. Williamson,et al.  Series elastic actuators , 1995, Proceedings 1995 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. Human Robot Interaction and Cooperative Robots.

[13]  Alin Albu-Schäffer,et al.  Overview of the torque-controlled humanoid robot TORO , 2014, 2014 IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots.

[14]  Sergey V. Drakunov,et al.  Capture Point: A Step toward Humanoid Push Recovery , 2006, 2006 6th IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots.

[15]  Satoshi Kagami,et al.  Walking control on uneven terrain with short cycle pattern generation , 2007, 2007 7th IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots.

[16]  Masayuki Inaba,et al.  Development and verification of life-size humanoid with high-output actuation system , 2014, 2014 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA).